Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

gewindows

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2010, 09:48:32 am »
The controls for you to clean this type of glass can be extensive


What are we doing here, changing a nuclear fuel rod or something? 

They really dont give us any credit do they.

tompoole

  • Posts: 800
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #21 on: February 13, 2010, 10:54:37 am »
think you need to read the document in full, not just one or two bits that are taken out of it to make it seem more dramatic ar restricting than it actually is. remember its there for your own good. And if you work outside those peramiters set out in the HSE your Public Liability and acceident and sickness insurance WILL be invalid. So whats the point of paying for insurance if its not valid!

dai

  • Posts: 3503
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #22 on: February 13, 2010, 11:24:54 am »
It's not the health and safety issue either, we are the ones that will get the blame if the roof in question starts leaking. I know I have walked on some spongy roofs in my time, where would we stand with our insurance cover if we put a foot through one?
If a customer asks you to do a window over a flat roof you should ask for a disclaimer in writing first.
It does seem a lot less hassle to leave it, as Dave said is it really worth it for a quid?

Moderator David@stives

  • Posts: 8829
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #23 on: February 13, 2010, 11:28:03 am »
Matt

I would trust the willis's, they are consultants for a few big window cleaning companies in London.

they arent as dumb as they look

Moderator David@stives

  • Posts: 8829
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #24 on: February 13, 2010, 11:28:35 am »
p.s

I think they work with JV Price

gewindows

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #25 on: February 13, 2010, 11:45:31 am »
Matt

I would trust the willis's, they are consultants for a few big window cleaning companies in London.

they arent as dumb as they look

Dave, we wont agree on this, you have your back to cover (as you employ) which is what drives the H&S these days, it was different 20 years ago.

The window cleaning companies you mentioned use Willis as consultants for one reason. It covers THEIR backs too in the event of an insurance claim. No other reason.

Insurance companies love these get out clauses but just because you have a consultancy behind you in reality doesnt mean you have a safer working practise, they are only guys sat behind desks with no hands on experience. You get to tick the boxes thats all. The realities of it are meaningless.




This is how I see it Dave in a not too short period of time....

Things will back-fire on the H&S and they will only have themselves to blame.

One day someone will have an accident and that person will sue the H&S (because its the H&S executive's job (isn't it?) to ensure all work places are safe from hazard).

This person (whoever that happens to be) will sue them because the blame culture will have become so twisted and engrained in our working lives that it will only serve to remove the element of PERSONAL responsibility; to such a degree that it will be seen to be fair that the H&S failed in THEIR responsibility to ensure that all kerbstones have chevrons painted on them as a hazard warning (or something as equally as bizarre) when said person trips and breaks his neck.

I bet they already have liability insurance covering themselves against this very thing.

Whatever happened to personal responsibility?


gewindows

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #26 on: February 13, 2010, 12:05:07 pm »
Just been thinking about my last post.

Then what will happen, once they're sued?

The H&S Executives insurance company will withdraw their insurance cover if they continue to offer guidelines and regulations on health and safety as they will be deemed to be responsible for situations they have neglected to assess, such as the kerbstone scenario.

I guess give them enough rope they'll hang themselves springs to mind, but I cant help thinking theyve started something here with their rules and regulations that'll catch them out eventually. Isnt it called Karma?

Moderator David@stives

  • Posts: 8829
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #27 on: February 13, 2010, 12:20:20 pm »
Matt

I agree if you are working safe already it doesnt make you safer, what it does is "prove" you are taking steps to "prove" you are mannaging the risks properly.

A case in point is all the ribbing I got when I broke my shoulder and being a member of safecontractor.,It didnt stop me falling although I took every step to get assessed that i was reducing risk.

Dave

gewindows

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #28 on: February 13, 2010, 12:22:57 pm »
You could be that bloke Dave  ;D


Id sue the H&S if I were you. They obviously under-regulated and didnt offer sufficient advice to prevent an accident on a step-ladder, its not your fault, its theirs  ;)


I'll settle for 20% as your 'consultant'

Window Washers

  • Posts: 9036
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #29 on: February 13, 2010, 12:27:46 pm »
ideal rob

if you look it up you dont have to secure your ladders if you are only up there for short time

its funny how most people hate ladders never came off one in 6 years they are safe if used properly


Ladders are not safe if used properly ::), they are dangerous, accidents  happen even to people that take care thats why it is called an accident. Touch wood I have never had an accident in the years I have used them, still use them today, but I would not say they are safe even when new.
If your not willing to learn, No one can help you, If you are determined to learn, No one can stop you ;)

Ian Lancaster

  • Posts: 2811
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #30 on: February 13, 2010, 01:13:42 pm »
Good Post Willis

Hope to see you posting more of the same, we need people like you on this forum with your expertise.

WHAT AN UTTERLY DEPRESSING THREAD THIS IS.

Dave,

At first I thought your post was 'tongue in cheek' but now I realise you're serious :o

WE DO NOT NEED MORE AND MORE REGULATIONS.

The more regulations you have, the less people think for themselves.  Certainly using ladders is dangerous, but the way to address the danger is for people to be aware and to THINK about what they're doing.  You can't legislate against stupidity, and overwhelming people with ever more detailed and constraining regulations has the opposite effect, it encourages people to ignore practical considerations because 'the regulations' tell you what to do in any given situation.

THERE WILL ALWAYS BE THE SITUATION WHICH ISN'T COVERED BY REGULATIONS and then the unfortunate individual, so used to being wrapped in the cotton wool of regulations will do something silly because he isn't trained to consider the consequences of his actions.


I learned this job long before there was any H&S, WFP or any of todays innovations.  The company I worked for insisted I spent the first week with an experienced shiner who taught me everything he knew and that included a thorough grounding in the safe way to use a ladder, and the way to work out FOR MYSELF if what I was proposing to do was safe.

THIS TRAINING WAS THE RESULT OF YEARS OF 'HANDS ON' EXPERIENCE TEMPERED BY CAREFULLY THOUGHT OUT IDEAS RESULTING ENTIRELY FROM THAT EXPERIENCE.

No amount of hypothetical work is of any value in the face of real experience.

My solution to the problem of deaths/injury resulting from the misuse of ladders in the infinitely varied situations we meet every day is that any organisation employing people to work on ladders must have access to training provided by people with not less than five years ACTUAL PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE in the use of ladders, and in the case of window cleaning that means splay-bottomed points, and must be able to demonstrate that their employees have received that training and subsequently been assessed as to their ability to understand and implement it.

In this case actual practical experience means constant daily use, not just the odd bit of ladder work as part of another job.

For sole trader, self employed people with only themselves as their responsibility, identical training should be available, and publicised through the forums and trade associations to give everyone the opportunity of acquiring proper training BUT NOT NECESSARILY COMPULSORY - if people want to kill themsleves, that's their prerogative provided they don't endanger anyone else.

I DO NOT, AND NEVER WILL BELIEVE THAT ANY TRAINING 'EXPERT' WITH HOWEVER MANY YEARS OF ACADEMIC LEARNING IS QUALIFIED TO DICTATE HOW PEOPLE IN THE PRACTICAL WORLD SHOULD ADDRESS THE EVERDAY HAZARDS THEY MEET IN THE COURSE OF THEIR WORK.

One example: as far as I am aware the H&S do not accept that window cleaners ladders are fit or safe for use in window cleaning.  How do they know?  Have they ever consulted any real window cleaner with many years experience and drawn meaningful comparisons between 'general' open ended ladders and 'specialist' window cleaning ladders?  I think not, otherwise they would have to accept that a tool which was devised by real, experienced tradespeople for their own increased safety long before most of todays H&S were born must have relevance and value.

I can't speak for other trades/industries, but I think I am entitled to speak for our own and I maintain that today's H&S is NOT about striving to increase safety, it is a regime grown out of a lucrative 'box ticking' industry that is concerned with demonstrating its own necessity to the point where it positively discriminates against nearly a hundred years of solid, relevant experience in order to justify its existence and its authority to extract revenue from the industry.

I don't expect much sympathy with my point of view, but I do believe that unless we start to make our voices heard this culture will spread across our society to the point where all individual thought and choice will be suppressed by an ever increasing industry of regulation - it is self propagating and is becoming ever harder to control. Soon it will control us.

Moderator David@stives

  • Posts: 8829
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #31 on: February 13, 2010, 01:35:12 pm »
Ian

all well and good, but what do I do when one of my lads has an accident and I took the attitude of "whatever"  ?

I would be put before the courts, and probably be fined heavily, maybe sued as well.

David are HSE professionals who help us comply with current regs , What is wrong with that, they dont make the regs, just guide us through them

p.s the HSE do still allow window cleaning from ladders


Ian Lancaster

  • Posts: 2811
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #32 on: February 13, 2010, 01:52:04 pm »
Dave, I think you are missing my point. 

The fact that you would be dragged before the courts bears out what I am saying: the H&S culture is self-serving - it  would prosecute and fine you because you failed to slavishly follow its dictate, not because you put your employees in danger.

I am most certainly not advocating an attitude of 'whatever' I believe in personal responsibility and REAL training.  If you read what I said about employers in my post above you will see I believe you have a responsibility to provide PROPER RELEVANT training which is designed to keep your employees safe, not to tick the boxes on an H&S checklist.

As for who makes the regulations, that just makes it worse - the authors of the regs are even more remote from reality and have no right to dictate to seasoned responsible professionals without at least the courtesy of proper consultation.

And by that I don't mean with someone holding an academic degree on "Which way up should a ladder be"

Matt Bateman:

Very good and well reasoned posts.

I think you and I are singing from the same hymnsheet ;)

gewindows

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #33 on: February 13, 2010, 01:54:19 pm »
Matt Bateman:

Very good and well reasoned posts.

I think you and I are singing from the same hymnsheet ;)

Im wasted here Ian, honestly mate, I think you might be too  ;)

In all seriousness Ian, you have made exactly the same point I was trying to get across, I think you put it in a somewhat more coherent manner.  :)

Nice one.

gewindows

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #34 on: February 13, 2010, 02:38:58 pm »
Isn't that legislating 'because of stupidity' as opposed to 'against stupidity'?

WILLIS

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #35 on: February 13, 2010, 02:48:31 pm »
Matt

I would trust the willis's, they are consultants for a few big window cleaning companies in London.

they arent as dumb as they look
[/they arent as dumb as they look?]

WILLIS

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #36 on: February 13, 2010, 02:51:26 pm »
Great to see such interest

Just want to clear up some issues

Firstly, I very rarely work for contractors

Secondly, my work on commercial, Duty holder, property management companies, is part of good risk management by them, to advise, assist on making work areas safer for window cleaners.  

Thirdly,
My work for the FWC is unpaid, I don’t claim any expenses and all time is out of my pocket

Insurance
Some of you may have forgotten some years back insurance premiums went through the roof, I was one of many including the FWC that campaigned to get insurance companies to look at the way they underwrite risk liability = The more you can prove your competency and that you work safely the lower we maintain insurance premiums = benefit to you ...not me

Effects of an accident
The way the courts will way up if you have done everything you can is “Reasonably practical”
This you can calculate
Picture the scales of justice on the Old Bailey roof
In one scale you place the value of your life
In the other you place the cost, time and trouble of controlling that risk
So if it’s going to cost £150 to hire equipment
Your balance out this
Your life against £150

So if you feel your life is worth more than £150 “and please ... before you jump all over £150 it’s AN EXAMPLE figure then don’t access the flat roof from a ladder ...

Some examples that are sadly happening far to often
 
A WINDOW cleaner who fell from a bay window roof while on his weekly round died accidentally, a jury has decided. Bill Wilson was found on a patio with head injuries after he fell from the roof of a house in Ilkeston in July last year. Derby and South Derbyshire Coroner's Court heard how a neighbor raised the alarm after hearing the 58-year-old calling for help. Paramedics took the father-of-four to the Queen's Medical Centre in Nottingham, where he died while undergoing surgery. Giving evidence, Sharon Caulfield said she returned to her home in Audley Close from Nottingham at around 2.30pm on the day of the incident.

TRIBUTES have been paid to a popular Townhill man who died in a tragic work accident on the eve of his 53rd birthday. James Ferrier, a self employed window cleaner, fell from a ladder while cleaning windows at a first floor flat in Townhill Road, Dunfermline, on Monday morning. The father of four, who was working with his brother Ronnie at the time, was taken by ambulance to Queen Margaret Hospital but passed away around midday. Family members said he was a beloved dad and granddad who lived for his family and will be sadly missed.

You make your choice....

gewindows

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #37 on: February 13, 2010, 02:56:06 pm »
Matt

I would trust the willis's, they are consultants for a few big window cleaning companies in London.

they arent as dumb as they look
[/they arent as dumb as they look?]

I think he's saying  look stupid  ;D

Personally I think thats a little over the top, but hey, Daves a man under pressure, you'll have to forgive him.



So if you feel your life is worth more than £150

If we lived our lives along those lines we'd never leave the house to go to work in the morning.

♠Winp®oClean♠

  • Posts: 4085
Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #38 on: February 13, 2010, 03:05:04 pm »
What about the use of poles extended 30% beyond the manufacturers recommendation for use by employees?

Any thoughts on that  WILLIS?

WILLIS

Re: whats the ruling on flat roofs?
« Reply #39 on: February 13, 2010, 03:11:22 pm »
Same as any equipment
Use and operate within the manufacturers recommendation (instruction)