Oh dear Matthew,
A omnivac and diy one aren't that different in my eyes
I realise you have no idea what your talking about either.
Since the beginning of this topic you have slated the system and Glyn H and his company and now because your not getting your way you start on Matt? You are now showing an IPAF Logo and your not a member - Why not leave the grown up conversations to the adults and the people that like to discuss cleaning and its related subjects without hijacking threads that you obviously know nothing about 
Kev,
How the hell don't I know what I'm talking about.
Instead of pointing out the positives of your system you have put down diy guttervac's and praised how good Omnivac's and how it can make a bounty of riches over inferior diy setups. Yet to me it seriously looks like exactly the same machine?
You could of told us about the pole or glyn's 'special hose' but you didnt 
So whats actually different about the Omnivac itself to the machine many other suppliers sell?
I personally think Mr H's one is overall a much better setup for height and lightness of pole.
I done my IPAF on the 8th of September!
You don't know what your talking about as you don't have any experience of ANY gutter cleaning machinery or tooling. You comments are without basis.
"yet it looks like the same machine" It isn't Omnivacs is greatly modified - Got it yet?
How can you say Mr H's is a better set up? have you seen it? used it? compared it to an Omnivac?
Mr H and I spent the day together to compare both systems, and the biggest thing we decided was the DIY machine lacks tooling and bore - therefore its inefficient when compared to the Omnivac. I cleaned 3/4 of a school while he did 1/4.
Mr H is still developing a copy of the Omnivac - Has the penny dropped yet Propole?
Mr H's pole is a carbon fibre pole and while the lightness would be an advantage at great height, its disadvantage is it will wear out!!! Omnivacs poles are not that heavy and perfectly useable up to 4 stories - most jobs are below this - Aluminum lasts! Still think carbon is a good idea for low standard work?
Did you know that rooted vegetation requires breaking up before the vacuum can remove it? A gutter spike is used for this purpose. Using a spike at 4 stories on a pole that wont snap or bend when you use it is the limiting factor due to weight. Most gutters that are cleaned are overgrown and need debris fragmentation. So a carbon fibre pole may be ideal for Vacuuming at 60 ft but how do you break up rooted material - I shall tell you - you cant unless you get up close and personal with a cherry picker etc. So what's the point of a super light vacuum pole if the limiting factor is the spike pole. If you used a spike on a carbon fibre pole it would break unless it was thick walled and then it would be as heavy if not more so than the aluminum powerpole.
Ok to show and use the IPAF logo you have to be a member. You are trained and certified but not a member. Give them a ring and you will see. Let them catch you using it and they will not be happy. Its a logo just like Ionics. You have to Pay to use it. You have not - you paid for a course.
I hope this is helping
