that's the problem with such a huge raft of regulations (that are continually being added to and tweaked)...CLARITY!
For us plebs it sounds an easy thing to just say; "If it is reasonable and practical to do a job any other way other than off a ladder then that method should be used."
You can kind of start off like that, but then you have to start adding in no end of qualifying caveats; Can an aerial fitter qualify as an exception for instance?
What about roofers doing repairs? At what point would "reasonable and practical apply where using scaffold or lifts and so on, and what about the relevant training and a further raft of H&S regs concerning the use of such equipment?
I've only sat here and tapped out a couple of hurried, poorly thought out ideas, but you get the drift, even a quick scratch of the surface by a pleb (ME
) Starts to show how complex it can become to express clarity.
Were you to just implement my own suggestion across the board you would wipe out tens of thousands of window cleaners and god knows how many other varied tradesmen and women.
It's all so depressing!
Did you know that if you are an employer and you are in a trade that uses...for instance, disc cutters, your employees are not allowed to change the blades unless they have been on a course and have the necessary certificates?
Lunacy!
It's only a case of unscrewing a single bolt!
Yet of course if an employee makes a mistake and the nice new, shiny tungsten blade should shoot off and chop the head of little child walking past, then you want to be sure it's someone else and not you that gets done for it don't you !
Ian
Like I said....It's all so depressing