I have read all of the posts on this thread, and will reserve judgement until the defendant has had a chance to speak.
Has he been summoned to this thread? Or maybe he is exercising his right to remain silent.
There are a couple of things worthy of consideration. I bought the SL2 55ft, it was delivered complete in one box, if however it had been delivered in 10 separate packages, how much would that of added to the cost?
I believe that Alex genuinely tries to give us what we consider to be the best tools for the job, he even evaluated the Stanley paint pad swivel conversion that I made.
The problem is that most of us are not in a position to judge what is the best tool.
OK we know what we want, a pole and brush that weighs nothing.
The practicality from an engineering aspect is daunting.
I had a number three section of the SL2 snap while I was lifting five sections of it, the pole wasn't even on the ground, it was resting on a hedge. I was positive that the pole had not sustained any previous damage.
I examined the broken section in my workshop, I am a skilled tool room machinist right up to inspection level.
I was surprised to find that at the point of breakage the wall thickness of the tube varied between 0.4 and 0.5 of a mm. I contacted Alex and emailed him photos showing the readings on the digital calipers, I also sent him the two pieces for his own inspection. Alex replaced the no 3 section free of charge. Alex said that these readings were within manufacturers tolerance.
Now from an engineering aspect 20% tolerance is from my own experience unheard of, so maybe there are manufacturing issues.
In my opinion telescopic carbon poles with this wall thickness is impractical, you have sections sliding up and down inside each other causing friction and wear, I'm no expert on the abrasive resistance of carbon fibre, but the fact that guys have complained of having black hands using these poles is worrying.
The other manufacturers have gone for a higher wall thickness, and with it increased weight, with carbon fibre being so expensive why would they do this?
We have demanded Lightness, and Alex has given it with the SLX, but is at a price where longevity is concerned?
I think that if we want a pole to last, and to be really light, then the modular route is the only practical solution, on a modular pole you can beef up the ferrules, and if we were prepared to have poles that would not stack inside each other, we could even have lightweight metallic ferrules that would last for ages.
I believe Alex to be a genuine man that really is trying to break ground in WFP technology, not easy for the little guy, and lets not forget he is still cleaning windows.