The way I see it david, its like this:
You get funding from the government to run this course.
So, you get as many window cleaners as possible to come to it, and you get your fee for each one. It doesnt actually cost the window cleaner anything (except time), but you get paid from the government for each one you train.
It doesnt matter that you don't actually know anything about one of the main method of window cleaning, because people arent going to complain about something thats free are they?. It wouldn't even matter if the course is of no practical use, because its free.
You have said yourself that you wont do training where there is no funding (like scotland) which tells me a great deal. It tells me that people would not pay for this. Maybe if you were charging for this course people might demand their money back as it didn't, for example, cover the main method of window cleaning - waterfed poles.
But why complain if its free eh? I'll tell you why. Because its not free, that funding you get comes from our taxes, and nothing you have said has convinced me that this course is worth anything. I object to paying tax only for people like you to pop up, who dont really know anything about what you claim to be training, but still do it because you get a fee from the government. To me that is little better than a scam.
That, and for the fact that I know more about the window cleaning that really matters - WFP - than you, is the reason I won't be coming.
If the funding from the government were to stop, as it might well do, then you would no longer do the course.
If you are so confident about how wonderful this training is, why don't you just charge the fee where there isnt any funding?
And out of interest, how much do you get from the government for each window cleaner? (I bet you don't answer that)