This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

cater

  • Posts: 36
Traffic V's Transporter
« on: October 17, 2009, 08:43:18 pm »
My little brother thinking of changing his van (Renault traffic) for a VW Transporter, He's about to start wfp! Whats your view guys? Which one is best??

John

chris@c.m.s

  • Posts: 1556
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2009, 09:09:32 pm »
I have a T4 transporter and have had a few problems with it i.e. lock barrels breaking, speedo packed up, fuel indicator/warning is dodgy and I've seen smoke coming out of the steering column just before starting it. but apart from the battery & starter packing up its been reliable  ;)   
Sussex by the sea

cater

  • Posts: 36
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2009, 09:23:29 pm »
1-0 traffic then! lol

matt

Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2009, 09:26:14 pm »
the VW Transporter is famous for is quality, you have to be very unlucky to have a duff VW


chris@c.m.s

  • Posts: 1556
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2009, 09:39:42 pm »
 Yep that's me all over Mr unlucky I quite accept that although mine hasn't let me down completely I have been unlucky with minor faults, and cost put aside I would buy another one not a t4 though, the gearstick is better on the dash.
     
Sussex by the sea

Steve Lowe

  • Posts: 177
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2009, 09:55:34 pm »
I am looking for another van early next year.
Last week i hired a lwb 130bhp  VW model and it was a dream to drive. I have driven loads of traffics and i dont think you can compare the two.

Steve
Steven J Lowe MBICSc

Lowes Cleaning Services Limited
www.lowescleaning.com

Craig - CW Window Cleaning

  • Posts: 288
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2009, 10:27:54 pm »
I have a T5 swb its drives as good as a car nice high view, great turning circle
I have one issue not as economical as I thought but then that could be I like to hear that turbo whistling !!! ;D

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2009, 10:31:36 pm »
T5 swb. Will not be beaten for quality and drive (IMO).

luther1

  • Posts: 1071
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2009, 10:44:15 pm »
I have a Trafic and its awful. Have a lwb T5 2.5 coming next month. Better residuals, reliability and build quality (IMO)

Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2009, 07:41:25 am »
I have a Trafic.  Drives nicely for a van but they will take a long time to live down those gearbox issues even if they really did rectify them for the 55 plate.
The sad truthg is that although my van runs OK, I simply have never trusted it.  It needed a gearbox change at 39,000 miles.  The van has now done 78,000 miles (do the maths).  I'm dreading what the next few thousand miles might bring.  Of course it may be just fine but there's no way of knowing.

Chris Cottrell

  • Posts: 3162
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2009, 08:45:25 am »
So whats the payload weight of the T5?

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2009, 09:14:02 am »
T32 = 1302kg

luther1

  • Posts: 1071
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2009, 09:36:40 am »
I have a Trafic.  Drives nicely for a van but they will take a long time to live down those gearbox issues even if they really did rectify them for the 55 plate.
The sad truthg is that although my van runs OK, I simply have never trusted it.  It needed a gearbox change at 39,000 miles.  The van has now done 78,000 miles (do the maths).  I'm dreading what the next few thousand miles might bring.  Of course it may be just fine but there's no way of knowing.

I agree. I have no trust in mine whatsoever. I don't know but maybe a 650ltr tank with everything else i carry is a strain on a 1.9 engine. Or maybe i just had a Friday afternoon one. Less than 80,000 miles and absolutely everything has gone wrong with it. Fingers crossed for the VW or i'll be having a moan at Alex ;D

bobby p

Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2009, 09:46:30 am »
what is it with this country - buying KRAUT steel just isnt doing us any favours !! >:(

Chris Cottrell

  • Posts: 3162
Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2009, 09:56:52 am »
How does that weight compare to a traffic, anyone know?

concept

Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2009, 10:22:14 am »
what is it with this country - buying KRAUT steel just isnt doing us any favours !! >:(

take your racist comment and f*** right off mate.

Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2009, 10:26:34 am »
How does that weight compare to a traffic, anyone know?

A Trafic (read Vivaro/Primastar) has a payload of just over a ton for the 2.7 tonners.  The 2.9 tonners have a payload of just over 1200 kg.
I bought a 2.9 tonner for the extra load carrying capacity.

elite mike

Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2009, 10:26:53 am »
what is it with this country - buying KRAUT steel just isnt doing us any favours !! >:(

take your racist comment and f*** right off mate.

does that mean flip ;)

concept

Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2009, 10:28:52 am »
what is it with this country - buying KRAUT steel just isnt doing us any favours !! >:(

take your racist comment and f*** right off mate.

does that mean flip ;)

to a mod, of course.  :)

Re: Traffic V's Transporter
« Reply #19 on: October 18, 2009, 10:31:16 am »
what is it with this country - buying KRAUT steel just isnt doing us any favours !! >:(

take your racist comment and f*** right off mate.

does that mean flip ;)

to a mod, of course.  :)

Not at all.  It means fahr.
Translated that would be "travel right off"   ;D