When I say WFP is superior, it's not just about the window itself. When working of a ladder, there have been many times for instance when getting a good footing has compromised the way I approach cleaning windows, I personally feel that all considered, window ,frame, safety and finish are served better by using WFP as a package. I'm probably contradicting myself here, but a good Trad cleaner often will do a better job than WFP, but that is simply down to the operator not the system itself. As I mentioned earlier, most Trad cleaners worked solely for themselves and were directly responsible for both standards of workmanship and the type of customer they pitched at. Now we have a supermarket scenario developing, where because of the perceived low skill requirements of WFP, and chasing the buck,companies are paying lads £6.50 - £7.50 an hour and because there actually doing the work, seeing first hand how much is charged and also possibly collecting the money, they feel hard done by, which doesn't always lend itself to good motivation. I know this to be true as I have been approached by many lads working for companies and asking me about starting up themselves. Also its probably true that the pot of money available to window cleaners historically, is now because of WFP increasingly going to bosses to fund there lifestyles. For instance there is a company where I work and one of the lads is a good friend of mine, he works on average for 60 - 70 hours per week for about £350 and his boss takes a good 3 or 4 holidays a year (Brazil, Cuba, Mexico etc). Ultimately its down to the individual to make his own choices, and I would respect that but overall it can have a negative effect on the morale of employees and there workmanship. This is the fundamental change in the dynamics of window cleaning in that it affords entrepreneurs the opportunity to make a killing out of the trade, but in turn, can turn the industry into a racket. For me the unique relationship between window cleaner and there customers is paramount.