allways TWO sides to the arguement
it seems that a fair few are very happy with the L 5 it heats water and the heater ( or the type of heater ) is used on boats, Campervans and hunting cabins all over the world, we have a Health and safety bloke ( David slater ) who has done safety course after safety course, he has the credentials to prove he knows what he is on about, he uses the heater and is happy with the safety of it
i keep on thinking they are used in campervans ( R.V's in the USA ) and boats and whilst people can find on u-tube videos of fires with them in, i can find video's of a house fire, doesnt mean to say i live without heat )
now the other side is NWH ( and his mate who just likes to post to cause a argument ) , now NWH has paid 2.5 K for a heater, he spoke to a guy in he pub, a fireman and a gas fitter ( correct me if i am wrong ) and decided it was too dangerous
is it safe ? ? ? ? i guess the 2 sides of the arguement will never agree, its all about a informed choice isnt it 
There is no argument, it’s just a few trying to justify that the L5 which cost £200 and is designed for a different purpose, is just as good and safe as an of the shelf heater for window cleaning that cost £2’500 plus.
If NWH spoke to fireman and a gas fitter they are both more qualified on the subject than David Slater who has apparently done H&S courses and seemed to have missed the whole point of H&S.
People are using these L5 not based on any informed choice, it’s based on a money choice.
Or to prove my point if both types of heater cost the same which one would you choose?
Your suppose to be in business to make money, even if you saved for a year for a proper heater it less than £7 a day, if that’s to much do it over 2 years at less than £3.50 a day, that’s where you should be making your saving.
Big upside is that you will most probably end up with a viable business to sell, if ever you wanted to.
I think you rubbish David Slater too much for what its worth.
He is the only one that actually got insured for his L5 usage (at least he claims, and i dont think he of all people would exaggerate that). Many others may claim to be covered, but to what extent? Maybe just carrying a LPG cannister, but not for full blown usage inside the van.
I asked this in a thread before hand, SO many people claim to use these, but none could say for sure they had it written into their policy they can use it fully covered.
One thing Mr Slater used (since his van has been stolen) is an approved refillable cannister, for vehicle usage, i dont see anyone else claiming that.
One thing is for sure, many people are going round with death trap DIY wfp systems not properly bolted in (using a few straps or ROPE!!!), overloading their vans, puting poles into the cabin area etc etc.... IMO just as dangerous, as you are far more likely to get involved in a road accident - you only need someone to step into the road, or brake hard in front of you..
Expect to see that tank, pole come flying past or even thru you....
Personally, besides on cost of the setup - gas is cheaper than diesel for a running cost - id prefer to use gas. No difference to using it my car... except i have to pay for a conversion so im sticking to petrol, but if i had a choice and money was no problem.. id gas my car anyday, as it would be cheaper to run.
But everyone has their preference.
FYI - Mr Slater went through the phone book basically, rang all the departments necessary - who all concluded, if installed properly, wouldn't pose a significant risk than any other set up. He documented his research, and advised others to do their own - i wonder how many L5 users have really done that.. not many.