Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

SL-X
« on: January 17, 2008, 08:23:43 pm »
Alex, don't suppose you would have a close up shot of the pole surface of your test pole? I'm just wondering how it's wearing? If it's like the S2 then it would have a bumpy surface due to the carbon weave. Have you had to tighten the clamps at all? Does the surface scratch easily?

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: SL-X
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2008, 10:15:13 pm »
What - show the faults of a product, how dare you! ;)

The oldest prototype is in the other work vehicle, I will try and take some shots of it early next week. As with any product it can scratch, but this pole is still in amazing condition. It has been used constantly for 8 months, 4 days a week and shows very little wear. I will try and show this on a close-up photo.

Alternatively pop down and I'll let you have a look for yourself!!

During the 8 months we have had to tighten the clamps up slightly, as you would expect, but only by about 10% of its total adjustment range.

Alex Wingrove

  • Posts: 1435
Re: SL-X
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2008, 10:37:53 pm »
8months!!!

Re: SL-X
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2008, 10:44:22 pm »
I'll get my bike out of the shed - be with you in a minute. So how durable are you expecting a pole like this to be in the hands of a clumso like me? Would it compare favourably with anything currently on the market or would you have to take into account the fact that it is much lighter than anything else? i.e. is durability compromised a little because of lightness?

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: SL-X
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2008, 07:37:35 am »
I'll get my bike out of the shed - be with you in a minute. So how durable are you expecting a pole like this to be in the hands of a clumso like me? Would it compare favourably with anything currently on the market or would you have to take into account the fact that it is much lighter than anything else? i.e. is durability compromised a little because of lightness?

Ultimately we do not know how long it will last as we have only given it hard testing for 8 months.  All we know is that after 8 months it is still well within it's usable lifespan.  We have designed this pole with longevity in view and also strength to withstand normal use and abuse.  No strength has been sacrificed to achieve it's lightness.  Obviously it's durability is far superior to any fibre glass/hybrid pole on the market but as regards other poles, time will tell but I am very confident. 

If you want ultimate long life - go for an aluminium pole such as the Brodex Prolong or Omnipole Powerpole.  The price you pay with aluminium poles is greatly increased weight (100% heavier) and increased flex.

We have taken the step of having aluminium clamps manufactured. These are about 30% lighter than equivalent nylon/plastic clamps and are many times stronger.

Roy Harding

  • Posts: 1986
Re: SL-X
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2008, 08:39:51 am »
Alex

What is the max working hight of the SLX.

Roy

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: SL-X
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2008, 08:42:50 am »
In standard form 30ft, with the optional extension 35ft.

http://www.gardinerpolesystems.co.uk/acatalog/Gardiner_Pole_Systems_SL-X.html

Roy Harding

  • Posts: 1986
Re: SL-X
« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2008, 08:43:30 am »
Thanks Alex

Roy

steve smith

  • Posts: 98
Re: SL-X
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2008, 09:20:46 am »
ny ideas of how much the extension will be?

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: SL-X
« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2008, 09:52:37 am »
About £85

Re: SL-X
« Reply #10 on: January 18, 2008, 02:03:19 pm »
Does the tip have the usual threaded end bonded in, or will it have the kind of tip on the S2 ?

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: SL-X
« Reply #11 on: January 18, 2008, 02:09:20 pm »
It will have a bonded in aluminium screw thread

Re: SL-X
« Reply #12 on: January 18, 2008, 02:18:21 pm »
All sounds good. :)