Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

paul@ctcs

Charlie Pad
« on: September 26, 2004, 10:51:02 pm »
Evening fellas, I'm planing to use my charlie pads for the first time in the morning and wondered if you chaps experienced with them may be able to pass on some knowledge regarding there best use.

Thanks Paul

Ken Wainwright

  • Posts: 2107
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2004, 11:04:39 pm »
Not used them myself yet Paul, but just follow the instructions carefully. Make sure you prepare the pads correctly. If it's particularly warm, or  sunlight is hitting the carpet, your pre-spray may dry out rapidly before cleaning, so be warned. Do a test first on an unsighted area of carpet to check for pile distortion/damage before proceeding. Expect very good results if comparing with cotton bonnets, and let us know how the job goes.

Safe and happy padding :)
Ken
Veni, vidi vici, Vaxi
I came, I saw, I conquered, I cleaned up!

paul@ctcs

Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2004, 11:36:38 pm »
Thanks Ken I'll report back with my results :)

Paul

Len Gribble

  • Posts: 5106
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2004, 11:45:11 pm »
Paul

I take it that you are doing commercial low profile, what rotary machine are you using?

They are totally crap in removing gum, and then my TM/Porty can’t do it ether! Thinking of taking the wife’s hover mower on next job, have considered the chain saw not sure if customer would be happy.

John B ant getting his buckets back nor the Charlie’s some one has nicked them.

Remember all LM systems are maintenances clean only, it may take three to four cleans.

Len
Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other. (Sidcup Kent)

Pristine_Cleaning

  • Posts: 103
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2004, 11:51:37 pm »
I have been using the pads for all carpet tiles.  the results are brilliant.  I leave them in the solution and then wring out by hand until they do not drip any more and then use them with a standard speed bonnet.

Really happy with them

Regards

John
John Byrne
Pristine Cleaning

paul@ctcs

Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2004, 12:05:36 am »
Thanks Guys, the rotary is a numatic 200rpm machine, the carpet i'm going to use the charlie pads on is a short pile synthetic which i extraction cleaned a few weeks ago and transformed it from solid black tar like mess to a bright, clean, gum covered carpet :P
I've since then removed hundreds of stamped in wads of gum using Solutions gum remover, this has left some slight marks behind so plan to remedy this and bring it up to scatch with the pads.

Paul

Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2004, 12:06:08 am »
Nick Holman seems to like them, but don't mention Chinese  ;)

Len Gribble

  • Posts: 5106
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2004, 12:39:26 am »
Chris

May I add nor the Bangladeshis.

I’m into a nick-picking mood.

Paul

Gum one or two not a problem but hundreds in one locations sorry not into bowing to any one unless the pay for it.

Len


Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other. (Sidcup Kent)

Phil Marlor

  • Posts: 678
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2004, 12:47:24 am »

John (Pristine),

I have Charly Pads but yet to be convinced about them, but then again I am not a great fan of Bonnet cleaning.

I would love to know where the dirt goes, I still cant get it out of my head that I am just moving it around.

Didnt get any instructions with mine, but all I do is soak them in a microsplitter like you, ring them out and clean.

Only ever used them on low profile, I do feel this method is only any good for very very lightly soiled carpet.

Phil
Stevenage, Herts

LUTON TOWN 3-0 SUNDERLAND

Dynafoam

Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2004, 12:54:05 am »
Quote
John B ant getting his buckets back nor the Charlie’s some one has nicked them.


Len,

Please tell me you were kidding.


Fintan_Coll

Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2004, 01:12:11 am »
I tried them with the Dry fusion machine but they simply will not stay on the grippers. Nick said he would send me on another type of gripper so I will see what happens then.

paul@ctcs

Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #11 on: September 27, 2004, 01:45:18 am »
Len, They are paying for the gum removal plus i have a maintenance plan worked out with this customer so could prove to be worth a few blisters scrubbing out the gum  :)

Paul

Len Gribble

  • Posts: 5106
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #12 on: September 27, 2004, 11:02:49 am »
John

Yes I am

Len ;D
Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other. (Sidcup Kent)

Kevin_Gare

  • Posts: 94
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2004, 02:00:50 pm »
For John Bolton

John I put them in Len's garage myself. So I know that there safe.

Kevin 8)
Kevin
South London Geezer/working City, south London, North Kent.

paul@ctcs

Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2004, 02:04:20 pm »
Good morning! I just got back from my first charlie pad experience and I'm happy with the results. After vacuuming all the ash and butt's i very lightly pre sprayed with Solution #2 ( 20-1 ratio ) and misted a little Eco spotter on to the residue left behind from gum removal. With The double ringer bucket filled with one side cold clean water and the other side warm water plus solution #2 at 15-1. I soaked the pads in the solution and rung out then covered about 10 square meters before changing pads. The results were great and i managed to cover around 100 sq m's in a little over an hour ;D  I'll be quicker next time now i've got it sussed.

Paul

woodman

  • Posts: 1069
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2004, 06:51:27 pm »
Hi guys

Interesting thread especially those still sceptical about results of pad cleaning.

I don't agree that its just for very lightly soiled carpets or just maintanance cleans as I have used my Texatherm System on heavily soiled carpets with very good results.

Last Friday  I did a large office area that had been HWE & Dry Foam cleaned with disastrous results.Carpet tiles were left very heavily soiled in all the main areas, the Texatherm took this right out and left the tiles dry within minutes.

(I was going to use Charly Pads for the first time on a test area but they didn't arrive)

I also clean domestic carpets using Texatherm, when drying times are an issue, and have returned soiled carpets back to an acceptable level of cleanliness,

Like all these things it just takes practice ;)

paul@ctcs

Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #16 on: September 27, 2004, 07:23:04 pm »
If the results of HWE were disasterous it must have been done wrongly or large amounts of residue were left, resulting in quick resoiling, a splash and dash cleaner in before you perhaps woodman? I dont doubt the results which Texatherm can produce i understand they can be excellent but surely HWE should produce at the very least just as good results if a little wetter??

Paul

mark_roberts

  • Posts: 1899
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #17 on: September 27, 2004, 07:33:13 pm »
Texatherm is the way to go for low profile carpets IMO.  Faster, easier, dryer, more money per hour.

Woodman

I've tried Texatherm on domestic carpets but never really feel its as clean as HWE.  Do you offer it as a system or just for the problem carpets (BWiltons).

thanks
Mark

Pristine_Cleaning

  • Posts: 103
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2004, 09:12:05 pm »
Hi Phil (Deep Clean)

Not sure where the dirt goes but it does go.  I have used them on lightly and heavily soiled carpet tiles for one perticular customer on their offices and canteen and the results were great even after they had dried.

Might want to talk to Nick about where the dirt goes to shed some light for you.

Regards

John
John Byrne
Pristine Cleaning

Phil Marlor

  • Posts: 678
Re: Charlie Pad
« Reply #19 on: September 27, 2004, 09:27:07 pm »

I would never use them in a domestic situation, I feel like I am ripping the customer off.

Last time I used them on a low profile carpet I went over the carpet after with HWE and pulled out lots of soil, so explain that.

I am convinced that this type of clean only skims the surface, its not a deep clean, on a heavily soiled carpet (which lets be honest is more often than not) it will still be filthy after, but cosmeticaly it may look OK.

Phil
Stevenage, Herts

LUTON TOWN 3-0 SUNDERLAND