Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

STEVE71163

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #20 on: September 22, 2003, 04:37:44 pm »
Thanks the Fed Man. I think i will get in touch with ott and ask for some literature and maybe a demo ???

Steve Lowe

STEVE71163

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2003, 04:54:32 pm »
Can you clean windows successfully if it is raining with a pole or does the rain inter fear with the pure water ???

Steve Lowe

The_Fed_Man

  • Posts: 182
Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2003, 06:16:23 pm »
The main thing that stops you cleaning in the rain is customer attitude.  No 2 is you don't like getting wet.  We used to squeegee up to the point where you couldn't finish them properly.  Rain doesn't harm windows in most cases, airborne dust and dirt make them dirty.
Waterfed poles there is no scrim detailing or cloth work so you can work in most weathers.  Unless it's torrential we work, or if the windows are being visibly spoilt as we clean, as in the case of seafront windows.
Martin Warman
Executive Council Member N.F.M.W & G.C.
www.nfmwgc.com

STEVE71163

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2003, 06:20:58 pm »
Sorry to sound a bit stupid :-[ but how long are the hoses as i have some jobs that you would not get the van that near ???

Steve Lowe

The_Fed_Man

  • Posts: 182
Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #24 on: September 22, 2003, 06:59:16 pm »
We run 3 reels of 150 feet each on one pole, at a push we have used 4 x 150 feet, one pole.  2 poles using 300 feet is no problem, but if you had one pole at 50 feet high and another say 10 feet high using these lengths, it might be too much for the pump.
But in general no problem.  If inaccessable you could use a trolley or backpack.
Martin Warman
Executive Council Member N.F.M.W & G.C.
www.nfmwgc.com

STEVE71163

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #25 on: September 22, 2003, 07:04:51 pm »
Thanks Fed Man.  :)  I think the next stage is for me to get information from the different companys :D

Steve Lowe

STEVE71163

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #26 on: September 22, 2003, 07:11:13 pm »
Fed Man, Are your systems ott  ???

Steve Lowe

The_Fed_Man

  • Posts: 182
Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #27 on: September 22, 2003, 07:16:14 pm »
Yes, I have the 1000 litre Reach & Wash Commercial in a one and a half ton Transit.  One ton vans will take 650 litre systems, one & a half ton vans take the 1000 litre systems, escort size vehicles take the 300 litre systems.
Martin Warman
Executive Council Member N.F.M.W & G.C.
www.nfmwgc.com

STEVE71163

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #28 on: September 22, 2003, 07:19:59 pm »
Thanks Fed Man,  I will start having a look around :o and compare the different systems and then go from their.

Thanks again :D

Steve Lowe

Majestic

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #29 on: September 22, 2003, 07:31:12 pm »
Fed Man
How much of your work is done by poles

The_Fed_Man

  • Posts: 182
Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2003, 07:36:42 pm »
Majestic,
Virtually all of it.  Only on some older type, poor state of repair windows the system doesn't work so we squeegee as usual.
I've just had a look at your web page, which size Reach & Wash do you have and do you use it on Residential?
Martin Warman
Executive Council Member N.F.M.W & G.C.
www.nfmwgc.com

karlosdaze

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2003, 10:36:45 pm »
Working in the rain shouldn't have any effect in theory. The idea of RO (Reverse Osmosis for hard water areas) and DI (De-Ionisation for soft water areas) water is that the water is pure when cleaning the windows. In theory the rain from the sky is pure and so in turn should not streak the windows. Where I live the wind whips up the sand from the Sahara and drops it on us. This is more difficult to clean with a water fed pole. In the UK airborne matter is what marks the water fed window.

For anyone who actually uses a water fed pole, please try this at home. Put your pure water in a glass and cover with alu kitchen paper. Remove after a day.

By the way, my tds in Mallorca runs as high as 1400!!!

The_Fed_Man

  • Posts: 182
Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2003, 10:41:53 pm »
Karl,
Alu as in aluminium paper?
Martin Warman
Executive Council Member N.F.M.W & G.C.
www.nfmwgc.com

sham33

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #33 on: September 22, 2003, 10:54:44 pm »
Would a cheap mobile system like the Cricket system from OTT be any good in a hard water area? The waters very hard down here.

Majestic

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2003, 10:55:53 pm »
Fed Man
I have a 40ft OTT pole and a 18ft pole from Mr Fogewll
I use the 40ft for a school that I clean , and on a couple of other jobs , I use the 18ft  for a couple of other jobs ,most of my work  is terraced houses ,its quicker to use a ladder as most of the back alleys around here have lots of little dog droppings.I looked at the OTT system but I have not got the work to justify the amount it costs , I have to admit I do like using my pole it  has made the jobs I use it on alot easier to clean.
How do you price your jobs  ??? I know that no 2 jobs are the same , I used to price on how long that it would take me to clean it , but now I price it on how long would it take me on a ladder then add some more for good look 8)

The_Fed_Man

  • Posts: 182
Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #35 on: September 22, 2003, 11:04:48 pm »
Majestic,
I price the same as ladderwork. Have you looked into the backpack system for those back alley jobs ;)  What system are you using, Peter F's trolley?
Martin Warman
Executive Council Member N.F.M.W & G.C.
www.nfmwgc.com

Majestic

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #36 on: September 22, 2003, 11:14:53 pm »
Fed Man
I have heard about the backpack, Jeff Brimble has one butI have  not seen one ,and would not know where to look for one
I use a 36 in mixed bed resin  tank, a 136 ltr water tank , flowjet pump  crude but it does the job.  8)

The_Fed_Man

  • Posts: 182
Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #37 on: September 22, 2003, 11:40:38 pm »
Well, everybody was using the Hozelock 20 litre one around £100 ish but I have seen others.  I did see one in a Machine Mart catalogue the other day resonably priced but haven't looked at it in the flesh so to speak.
Martin Warman
Executive Council Member N.F.M.W & G.C.
www.nfmwgc.com

Majestic

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #38 on: September 23, 2003, 12:10:31 am »
Fed Man
Just had a look in Machine Mark but could only see a clarke 6litr one at £30.49 8)

Majestic

Re: Pure water systems - which is best?
« Reply #39 on: September 23, 2003, 12:25:10 am »
Fed Man
Had another look in Machine Mart(with my glasses on this time ) they do a 20ltr liquid sprayer  back pack at £46.94 is that the same thing, with the pack on your back how do you get power to pump the water  8)