Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

carpetclean

  • Posts: 802
scotchgard
« on: September 15, 2006, 10:10:14 am »
just wanted to warn people who promote scotchgard as i wanted to get a licence to apply the stuff. it seems a licence has not been issued for more than 5 years and as you have to have the licence re newed every three years this means anyone who advertises that they are licenced are in fact advertising illegally. there  is a certain company up north who purport to grant a licence and in fact cant. when i spoke to them they assured me it was a licence, but after i told them what 3m said they retracted the statement and said it was a certificate in spray technique. but they still will sell you scotchgard which they import from america. i was told by 3m that they are looking in to people who claim to have licences and will be taking legal action.i still have not finished dealing with 3m and will be contacted by them shortly over the claims of the northen supplier , i will let you know the outcome
NCCA   IICRC


name peter reed

Mike Roper

  • Posts: 326
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2006, 09:26:16 pm »
As far as I was aware Multimaster at Stockport have sole rights to Scotchgard over here aswell as Leather master products. They are a warranty supplier for the furniture retail trade.
Mike

carpetclean

  • Posts: 802
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2006, 10:14:04 am »
i was contacted yesterday by 3m and they do not endorse the product by any other company nor do they offer warranty as officially it is not allowed in this country using the 3m logo .its true certain suppliers are getting it from the us and offering there own warranty but they are not allowed to use the name of 3m which is what the controversy is all about. i was also told that 3m will not be allowing this product to be licenced in the forceable future due to health reasons. they will also be pursuing any individual who uses the 3m logo to promote scotchgard. including individual web sites
but i was also told that they cant stop people importing scotchgard but they Stress that that spraying in the home SHOULD NOT BE ENDORSED because of health reasons
NCCA   IICRC


name peter reed

Liahona

Re: scotchgard
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2006, 11:18:09 am »
Easy way out is to use other products. 3m isnt one of the better products to use anyway. So in the end who cares what 3m say about anything. Best, Dave.

Derek

Re: scotchgard
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2006, 11:55:08 am »
Part of my business name is Scotchcare Services and this applies to many of the 'old' Scotchcare network companies

I have a letter of authorisation from 3M that allows me to do this and in fact they actively encouraged us to promote the network which we did. 3M are aware of this situation but to take away the permission to use the Scotchcare name after so long would literally take away many peoples livelyhoods and would, I am certain, result in some massive compensation claims and damaging adverse publicity for them. 

The new reformulated Scotchgard fabric protector is a solvent based product and it is correct that 3M do not advocate the use of this product in the home environment for the obvious Health and Safety implications

carpetclean

  • Posts: 802
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2006, 12:11:09 pm »
derek i suggest you contact 3m direct for clarification as i was told BOTH water based and solvent based scotchgard products have been withdrawn in this country and an applicators licence lasts 3yrs only the last licence issued was 5 yrs ago
dave it may not be of interest to you [ no offence] but to people who promote it i am sure it is.
NCCA   IICRC


name peter reed

Liahona

Re: scotchgard
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2006, 02:07:10 pm »
Peter, no offence taken. My point was and still is, is that there are far superior products out there.....so felt it would be easier to just use those than the hassle that is associated with 3m. Scotch products dont have the best reputation as they once did have so again why deal with all the hassle. I protect all my jobs or at least the first cleaning so understand the idea of promoting this type of service. I feel it is at the end of the day the service we provide to the customer not the product itself. Hence my comment of who cares about anything that 3m say. It is already causing concern from your self and Derek and contention isnt always good. Mind you I know I always cause a stir so what the hzll. Anyway, best, Dave.

Derek

Re: scotchgard
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2006, 12:56:27 pm »
In fact the 3M applicator licence was for one  year only and renewable after annual training at Atherstone
3M did stop producing Scotchgard protector together with approximately twenty-four other non protector related products about six years ago but the network was still using up the stock for two years after that point.

The products have been reformulated and I have been using the new Scotchgard fabric protector for about two years now. I have always have Scotchgard carpet protector available for my clients and to this day fulfill all the requirements of the old licence agreement and the Scotchcare network agreement. Incidentally we have never formally been advised that the licence has ceased.

I do understand that 3M at Bracknell and in the US didn't realise that the Scotchcare network remained in existance and very much active and it must have be an embarrassment to them to suddenly be told that over one hundred applicators were still actively promoting their product and brand.

They are totally aware of the current situation as I have been one of several people instrumental in making sure that they do

NigelD

  • Posts: 114
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2006, 02:04:10 pm »
When I speak with prospects about protectors. I ask if they have heard of Scotchgard because as a brand name it is something they are more familiar with. I then explain that I don't use Scotchgard but a simliar product. To date it has not caused any problems not having Scotchgard.

Nigel

premier floorcare

  • Posts: 120
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2006, 04:01:27 pm »
As I understand it 3m withdrew scotchguard production due to the fact that it contained perfluorooctane sulfonate . Do a google search on this chemical & you will see why.

Len Gribble

  • Posts: 5106
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2006, 05:25:09 pm »
Peter

Been down that road, thinking of setting the trading standards on them in my neck of the woods, but on second thought!  Think logo looks good and I can jump on the bandwagon am sure 3m wont mind, locals may but it dog trying to eat a highly paid solicitor. ;D

Len
Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other. (Sidcup Kent)

Derek

Re: scotchgard
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2006, 07:34:22 pm »
Hey Uncle Len....I wouldn't try moonlighting the 3M logo...

3M are still very active at protecting it....

I explained the situation regarding the old newtwork and why many of us are still using the Scotchcare name etc....it would be difficult for 3M to deal with us in the same way

Ian Gourlay

  • Posts: 5746
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2006, 08:03:25 am »
Prochem. do a 3m produduct

Can you use 3m logo if you are promoting this product.

Whats the situation if you use the name Scotchguard  instead of Scotchgard

I am not convinced public knows logo or how it is spelt just the word which means carpet protector

Derek

Re: scotchgard
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2006, 03:44:04 pm »
Ian

Be careful 3M are getting heavy handed about their logo and name....a letter has been sent out to the old network...it gets interesting from now on

carpetclean

  • Posts: 802
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2006, 04:39:00 pm »
hi derek out of interest when did you recieve the letter from 3m
NCCA   IICRC


name peter reed

HolmansUKLTD

  • Posts: 849
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2006, 07:41:31 pm »
Any clients who ask for their carpets to be protected allways ask for them to be "Scotchguarded" I just tell them i use a different protector and their happy, cant see what all the fuss is about ??? ::)

Mind you i use Dry Fusion now and that has a pretty good barrier procter built in and drys in 40 mins!!

Nick
Surreys No1 Carpet & Upholstery cleaner
Surreys No1 Dart player
IICRC water restoration Technician

Len Gribble

  • Posts: 5106
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #16 on: September 19, 2006, 02:27:07 am »
Ian

Think I own the A/S logo as I had it changed to the correct spelling (and can prove it)

Nick

DF, are you a licensee? ;D

Derek

Me moonlighting wasn’t that a TV program ;D, have to say they are still sitting on their laurels since the first carpex ???, methinks not that important to them! 8)

Len
Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other. (Sidcup Kent)

Derek

Re: scotchgard
« Reply #17 on: September 19, 2006, 06:05:23 am »
Letter from 3M arrived yesterday (Monday)... I have already spoken to several Scotchcare Service companies with regard to a concerted response

carpetclean

  • Posts: 802
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #18 on: September 19, 2006, 06:47:32 am »
hi derek
 thought so i think i have started the ball rolling or at least made them push it harder sorry. !!! as when i spoke to them about licences they said they would do something about it and they are !!
NCCA   IICRC


name peter reed

HolmansUKLTD

  • Posts: 849
Re: scotchgard
« Reply #19 on: September 19, 2006, 08:07:44 am »
Len i have told you before i am ::)

Nick
Surreys No1 Carpet & Upholstery cleaner
Surreys No1 Dart player
IICRC water restoration Technician