I don't think a thin bulkhead would hold it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnFyMqPER3g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrbvYwVQWZw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9usI6qFzfpo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w56cXOXtrrk
Problem with that video is its for sales the non grippa tank appears to have no restraint at all, it's also allowed to travel to the cab if already against a bulk head then it would not breach it, as clean clear pointed out the best way would be a second bulk head using the vans structural pillars
Darran
The video you are referring to of the 'tank fail' is the very first prototype crash tested system we sent along for exploratory testing of designs and to start to understand the forces involved in restraining a system.
It really does look catastrophic and is if there was no restraint at all - however that is definitely not the case. It was a modular tank design with 850litres of water in it with screw-on lids. It did have a restraint system which weighed about 90kg and was very securely mounted into the van. It was a low-level perimeter frame mounting system (as favoured by many DIYers) along with restraint bars through the moulded centre of the tanks - these were all fixed with 16mm bolts through floor into spreader plates under the floor. We learned a lot from this 'failure' and used it to greatly improve subsequent designs and MIRA tests.
What happened in the accident-test was:
1. The tanks collapsed under the weight of the water (this was despite being tank standard 6mm thick polythene) - this was because despite feeling very strong the tank itself is flexible in a crash and without full height restraint at the front can move too far forward.
2. Due to the collapsing pressure of the water the lids were blown off and the tank ripped apart.
3. Then under the strain of this forward movement the restraints bolts and spreader plates (1/4 the size of the current ones) started moving forward and sliced through the floor pan like a knife through butter destroying several cross members as it slid through them.
4. The system had moved completely out of the cargo area, through the cab area and then the forward moving water ripped through the engine bay bulkhead.
At the time I was not very pleased with the end result

- however as a learning tool it was invaluable and taught me a new respect for carrying such a concentrated (most of the vehicle's load in just a 1/6th of its load area) and fluid (as in its ability to change shape) load.
What we did learn has been incorporated into the current Grippamax systems:
Non-Modular increased strength tanks
Burst-proof lids
Low level tanks
Full 'honeycomb' baffling
Full height restraint system
T-Bar front and rear restraint bars with large bonded spreader plates
There are of course many different ways of securing a tank of water in a van - it is always up to each user to risk assess their load, the van and their method of fixing. As long as they are happy with their choice then that is all that really matters (as long as they do not have an Employee sitting next to them

)