I like the way Andy Willis takes the time to reply to everyone's comments, EXCEPT MINE where I clearly point out that the regulations DO NOT require cordoning off when using waterfed poles, and that he is plainly wrong.
Then I see things like this, and his agenda is all too clear:
one of the items I would put forward and to be addressed is the safe use of water fed pole and what controls are required, legal status, Not my view but that of a QC and judge, then to get the FWC or new trade association to produce a new guidance document.
Yes Andy Willis would just love to be involved with this, and you can bet your bottom dollar that any guidance he proposes will be in the interest of HIM and not the window cleaner.
Question: Why do you think there needs to be guidance on what controls are required? What accident statistics have you got to show they are needed? NONE because there aren't any, because it is not a problem.
When I went on the BWCA course, they said the HSE had already produced official guidance on the use of waterfed pole, and showed us the document. The fact that you don't know this just goes to show that you don't have a clue.
It's obvious that the only person to ever suggest that waterfed pole use needs "controls" in other words restrictions - is someone who will financially benefit from it.
He's already proved he is willing to say anything to scare monger people into thinking the regulations require things they DO NOT, all so he can push his training.
We need all to be awake to what Andy Willis is doing here - he is proposing that window cleaners are restricted in how they currently work! "Controls" on the use of waterfed pole? We already know that he thinks that means we should be cordoning off!
If we aren't careful here, we could have a total numpty with vested interests like Andy Willis influencing the law, and that will be a very bad day for window cleaners.