This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

herbiefatboy

  • Posts: 361
STAFF
« on: July 13, 2009, 06:42:36 pm »
for those of you out there who employ do you find it more hassle than it is worth?because lately i have been feeling like this what with holiday money,his tax and so on any other views would be great.

Sapphire Window Cleaning

  • Posts: 2942
Re: STAFF
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2009, 06:56:35 pm »
If he isnt earning you 2-3 times what you pay him, get rid and get someone else mate.
if you pay him £50 per day and he gets you in £150 per day its a hassle worth having.
Reaching parts traditional window cleaners can not reach.

GWCS

Re: STAFF
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2009, 06:59:23 pm »
ensure his training record is up to date to avoid some potential nasty claim. If he knows his days are numbered he may slip off his ladder or drop his pole on him for a nice little pay off.

martinsadie

Re: STAFF
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2009, 07:31:23 pm »
If he isnt earning you 2-3 times what you pay him, get rid and get someone else mate.
if you pay him £50 per day and he gets you in £150 per day its a hassle worth having.
think i would rather work in a factory again than work for you  :o :o

dave0123

  • Posts: 3553
Re: STAFF
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2009, 07:37:53 pm »
Quote
If he isnt earning you 2-3 times what you pay him, get rid and get someone else mate.
if you pay him £50 per day and he gets you in £150 per day its a hassle worth having.

think i would rather work in a factory again than work for you   


Lucky if you would get that working round here, 9 out of 10 jobs in the job centre is the bare minimum.
Dave.

mike1986

  • Posts: 432
Re: STAFF
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2009, 07:45:35 pm »
Why dont you get the guy to register himself as self employed? that way he can work for you as a sub contractor and you can just get him to write u an invoice each week and pay him that way. maybe bump up his wages slightly so he goes for it. than let him worry about his own tax. its alot less work for you. i think its just about legal lol  :P

Ian Lancaster

  • Posts: 2811
Re: STAFF
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2009, 07:54:32 pm »
Why dont you get the guy to register himself as self employed? that way he can work for you as a sub contractor and you can just get him to write u an invoice each week and pay him that way. maybe bump up his wages slightly so he goes for it. than let him worry about his own tax. its alot less work for you. i think its just about legal lol  :P

No it isn't and the tax man will have a field day if he finds out :P

tomy jackson

Re: STAFF
« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2009, 07:56:00 pm »
only leagl if he dus for moor than one or he has som of is owen work

s.w.c

  • Posts: 1174
Re: STAFF
« Reply #8 on: July 13, 2009, 08:00:37 pm »
ive got a bird works with me i pay her peanuts

Helen

Re: STAFF
« Reply #9 on: July 13, 2009, 08:02:52 pm »
Why dont you get the guy to register himself as self employed? that way he can work for you as a sub contractor and you can just get him to write u an invoice each week and pay him that way. maybe bump up his wages slightly so he goes for it. than let him worry about his own tax. its alot less work for you. i think its just about legal lol  :P

No it isn't and the tax man will have a field day if he finds out :P

Ditto :) :)

Helen

Re: STAFF
« Reply #10 on: July 13, 2009, 08:08:36 pm »
for those of you out there who employ do you find it more hassle than it is worth?because lately i have been feeling like this what with holiday money,his tax and so on any other views would be great.
What exactly is wrong? Is his work standard good enough or is it just a case of you didn't realise what was involved behind the scenes?

windowswashed

  • Posts: 2626
Re: STAFF
« Reply #11 on: July 13, 2009, 09:02:23 pm »
PAYE employees are a lot of work, organising their work, doing their wages, finding them wet weather work, time off sick, absence (pulling sickies) etc.

Unless you are making a worthwhile profit from them and are prepared to put in the extra time behind the scenes, you would probably be better off working alone with the added advantage of running your round to suit you best without all the hassle.

Tailor your round, pick up better paying work and sell, pass on or try to increase poorer paying work until you are in a better position to reconsider employing again to put you in a less stressed out position.

seandyer2003

Re: STAFF
« Reply #12 on: July 13, 2009, 09:12:23 pm »
If you canvassed one offs and they did them with there own equipment etc you could maybe get away with it but its  a risky game..... but a full time employee should make you money if they work right and round is good, well priced


bassjamm

  • Posts: 92
Re: STAFF
« Reply #13 on: July 13, 2009, 10:24:21 pm »
Why dont you get the guy to register himself as self employed? that way he can work for you as a sub contractor and you can just get him to write u an invoice each week and pay him that way. maybe bump up his wages slightly so he goes for it. than let him worry about his own tax. its alot less work for you. i think its just about legal lol  :P

No it isn't and the tax man will have a field day if he finds out :P

Why isn't this legal then?  If you're getting receipts and what have you, why would it be an issue?

seandyer2003

Re: STAFF
« Reply #14 on: July 13, 2009, 10:26:42 pm »
THeyre not self employed, they work for you

Look here : (www.hmrc.gov.uk/employment-status/index.htm#1)

Employed or self-employed?
In order to answer this question it is necessary to determine whether the person works under a contract of service (employees) or under a contract for services (self-employed, independent contractor). For tax and NICs purposes, there is no statutory definition of a contract of service or of a contract for services. What the parties call their relationship, or what they consider it to be, is not conclusive. It is the reality of the relationship that matters.

In order to determine the nature of a contract, it is necessary to apply common law principles. The courts have, over the years, laid down some factors and tests that are relevant, which is included in the overview below.

As a general guide as to whether a worker is an employee or self-employed; if the answer is 'Yes' to all of the following questions, then the worker is probably an employee:

Do they have to do the work themselves?
Can someone tell them at any time what to do, where to carry out the work or when and how to do it?
Can they work a set amount of hours?
Can someone move them from task to task?
Are they paid by the hour, week, or month?
Can they get overtime pay or bonus payment?
If the answer is 'Yes' to all of the following questions, it will usually mean that the worker is self-employed:

Can they hire someone to do the work or engage helpers at their own expense?
Do they risk their own money?
Do they provide the main items of equipment they need to do their job, not just the small tools that many employees provide for themselves?
Do they agree to do a job for a fixed price regardless of how long the job may take?
Can they decide what work to do, how and when to do the work and where to provide the services?
Do they regularly work for a number of different people?
Do they have to correct unsatisfactory work in their own time and at their own expense?

Re: STAFF
« Reply #15 on: July 13, 2009, 10:45:21 pm »
Why isn't this legal then? 

Take it up with the govenment if you want but it's not.
The law changed a few years back to stop all this sub contracting to one business and getting around tax and N.I issues

NWH

  • Posts: 16952
Re: STAFF
« Reply #16 on: July 13, 2009, 10:48:53 pm »
If your thinking of paying them in the region of £300 per week be prepared to kiss up to 5k a year of your hard earned before you even earn a shilling lol,insurances holiday pay sick pay all has to be paid if you do it the proper and correct way.My sister in-law owns a very big care agency probobly the biggest in the south if not 1 of the biggest and they get people applying for jobs just to get on the books and then when they`ve done there time go sick lol,this is happening in all types of work so beware.

newbroom

  • Posts: 307
Re: STAFF
« Reply #17 on: July 14, 2009, 03:51:31 pm »
Blimey so many negative posts re employing its only difficult if you tell yourself its difficult.

Everyone on here is looking at this from the viewpoint of an employer or at the very least someone who is self employed, everyone on this site works for themselves so don,t necessary have the same working mindset has the guy who wants to be on books with is tax & ni sorted by his employer. All staff can be managed, they either perform to your standards or you manage them out of your business.

What exactly is wrong? Is his work standard good enough or is it just a case of you didn't realise what was involved behind the scenes?  Helen asked this good question or do you not have structure or systems in place to manage the employees hence it feeling like hard work.

Cheers Mark.

Clearpoint

  • Posts: 24
Re: STAFF
« Reply #18 on: July 14, 2009, 04:29:37 pm »
You mentioned that anyone can be managed out of a business.
How would you legally go about this if you wanted to drop an underperforming or troublesome employee?


ronnie paton

  • Posts: 3245
Re: STAFF
« Reply #19 on: July 14, 2009, 04:42:24 pm »
if there on statuary sick the government pay it i would never give full sick pay.