Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

kevin James

  • Posts: 343
FAO Alex G.
« on: April 10, 2009, 05:47:02 pm »
Alex,
I know you'll probably not like the following but:

I intend to purchase from your goodself a SL2 at 35 ft come early summer.
Now I already have 3 x 12 ft Omnipole alloys. (These are nos 1,2 & 3, and so are reasonable in weight)
I only have  a couple of jobs where I need 60 odd feet & so would it be possible to add your sections onto the powerpole?
When I have enough work to warrant the extra SL2 height then I would buy the extra then.
What would the dimension of the 35 ft base section be!
( I'm ok with this bring outside the warranty guidelines)

Thanks kevin.

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2009, 06:03:50 pm »
Hi Kevin,

Unfortunately the two pole systems are not compatible. The SL uses a tapered section whereas the Omnipole are straight sections.


kevin James

  • Posts: 343
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2009, 06:20:02 pm »
Thanks for quick reply.
Out of interest, what is the o/d of the bottom of the base section?

Thanks kevin.

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2009, 06:58:42 pm »
Thanks for quick reply.
Out of interest, what is the o/d of the bottom of the base section?

Thanks kevin.

The od of the largest section of the Super-Lite is 49mm.  The dimensions of the Powerpole's largest section is id 41.8mm, od 44.5mm.

matt

Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2009, 06:59:53 pm »
we like FAO Alex G posts

they allways make me smile

Glyn H

Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2009, 07:15:10 pm »
Actually the largest tube we have is 54mm OD  this is a No 9 tube
Our tubes are 1.25 mm / 0.0492" thick

kevin James

  • Posts: 343
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2009, 07:18:57 pm »


The od of the largest section of the Super-Lite is 49mm.  The dimensions of the Powerpole's largest section is id 41.8mm, od 44.5mm.

Alex, I think you have access to more than the customary 2% of your brain than most of us can use. Knowing your dimensions PLUS the oppo's. Impressed.
Thanks, kevin.

kevin James

  • Posts: 343
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2009, 07:24:53 pm »
Alex,
Can you sell a 45 ft SL2 working up from the thinnest section available?

Thanks kevin.

ftp

  • Posts: 4694
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #8 on: April 10, 2009, 07:28:01 pm »
Kev, if you want to see one give me a shout - I have the 56' one 60' reach S2

(or just subbie the job)

Dave

kevin James

  • Posts: 343
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #9 on: April 10, 2009, 08:12:16 pm »
Aye dave, ill take you up on that. Gonna be in BOA in about 2 weeks. Send us a txt.
07773 616059.

Cheers Kevin

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #10 on: April 10, 2009, 08:42:32 pm »
Actually the largest tube we have is 54mm OD  this is a No 9 tube
Our tubes are 1.25 mm / 0.0492" thick

Hi Glyn,

Thanks for that. I was quoting the figures for a standard 6 section power-pole.

Alex,
Can you sell a 45 ft SL2 working up from the thinnest section available?

Thanks kevin.

Hi Kevin,

Not quite sure what you mean by working up from the thinnest section available, but I can sure sell you 45ft SL!

Moderator David@stives

  • Posts: 8829
Re: FAO Alex G.
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2009, 09:56:44 am »
I reall wish you wouldnt put for Att of Alex posts up, if you have a quaestion ask everyone, if you have a specific urgent question then phone Alex.

Posts like this will lead to giving Alex trouble.