[groundhog]

I've been considering getting an auto-brush, as I'm fed up with fiddly taps! Does anybody use one, and if so what do you think of them? I don't want to fork out £60 on one if they are no good! Thanks 

[NWH]

Hi Groundhog,you can adapt it to any brush i believe now which is better as the 15" brush it used to come with you`d hate.

[groundhog]

Thanks NWH, do you use one?

[jouk45]

i use it daily, best thing you will ever use, i am amazed why everyone is not using it

[HIGH LEVEL WINDOW CLEANERS (scrimmy)]

i second that joe

[jouk45]

and thats another reason why scrimman gets his 55 houses done in a day  all those little things add up you know lol

[HIGH LEVEL WINDOW CLEANERS (scrimmy)]

stirrer

[jouk45]

    dont forget the clampless pole, i will give your secrets away lol

[HIGH LEVEL WINDOW CLEANERS (scrimmy)]

lol

[Nathanael Jones]

I had one,... it was good when I had a smaller tank, defo saves a lot of water.

To be honest though the weight put me off (The switch mechanism adds about 150 grams to the brush), so when \i got a bigger tank and RO I just gave it to a mate who was starting up.
The salmon brush that is supplied as standard is weighty too,.. I transferred the switch onto a bentley type diy brush after a few months of struggling with the salmon one!

[jouk45]

it can be added to any of the super lite brushes to make up for the weight, but to be honest, i take it of weekly for maintainance and its not that heavy, i found away round this issue, but as its peters idea, its only fair not to disclose it,

[[GQC] Tim]

Numatic George trigger on the pole is infinitely better.

[batterbee]

i use it daily, best thing you will ever use, i am amazed why everyone is not using it

I totally agree with you, I've used one ever since i started to use wfp 3 1/2 years, and wouldn't use anything else.

I don't really find the weight an issue at all and it's certainly a lot easier than using an in line tap.

John

[groundhog]

Thanks guys, where do I order one from?

[Mike 108]

Numatic George trigger on the pole is infinitely better.

I've never used an 'autobrush', so I can't comment on that.

However, I have 'Numatic' triggers on 4 poles. They have all been trouble-free and maintenance-free and have saved me 'loads' of water.

The ease of the 'on/off' action is the main 'plus', allowing you to 'scrub' without the continuous flow of water (which can sometimes be wasteful).

Mike

[EZclean]

i cant work out how to fit a trigger ? is their a link to fitting one

[Peter Fogwill]

Just to let everyone know I now use a lighter Salmon brush as standard for the Autobrush, it is now the lightest professional brush on the market that I know of. It also makes the Autobrush a little cheaper.

Mike triggers can be OK if you want to use many different sizes of poles instead of one pole.  Personally I wouldn't want to be swapping poles over, and wasting time doing so.

Peter

[[GQC] Tim]

Just to let everyone know I now use a lighter Salmon brush as standard for the Autobrush, it is now the lightest professional brush on the market that I know of. It also makes the Autobrush a little cheaper.

Mike triggers can be OK if you want to use many different sizes of poles instead of one pole.  Personally I wouldn't want to be swapping poles over, and wasting time doing so.

Peter

What do you mean Peter? I use one pole, one trigger for all my jobs?

What is the weight of the salmon brush without the Autobrush assembly?

[[GQC] Tim]

i cant work out how to fit a trigger ? is their a link to fitting one

Simple, use some zipties, it's not elegant, but in lack of a better solution it works very well.

[Mike 108]

... or a 'Jubilee clip'  (There is a slot in the base of the trigger assembly).