This is an advertisementInterested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
yes mate i have one ,its probably the most rigid pole ive used more so than ionics c/f, but only weighs 4kg' or less! i much preffer it to the ionics but doesnt feel as strongi might be putting it on ebay soon as i preffer poles with a bit more whip, but on the other hand i might try and get a g/f end section for more flex
I use them. They say they are 7kg but add hose, gneck, brush.fully extended they are a bit whippy, but can't fault strength and overall rigidity. They send you a 's' shaped gneck with an 18" vikan, I would try to get them to change the brush as that one is far too heavy, I got 12" vikan mono and they work well together. I've still got one from 5 years ago thats working fine. ( the previous version, heavier)
Far to heavy for me regardless of build quality,when will they learn. : : :
Quote from: NWH on August 22, 2008, 06:12:35 pmFar to heavy for me regardless of build quality,when will they learn. : : :I have some shorter light weight models, what would you suggest using @ 60 ft other than cherry pickers?
yes it is the 57. i've NEVER had a problem with them. using them or needing to get them fixed.
Quote from: MJH on August 22, 2008, 06:21:19 pmQuote from: NWH on August 22, 2008, 06:12:35 pmFar to heavy for me regardless of build quality,when will they learn. : : :I have some shorter light weight models, what would you suggest using @ 60 ft other than cherry pickers?Modular SL2,i like my tendons thanks.Using that pole will let you know you`ve got them.
Quote from: AJ on August 22, 2008, 06:21:36 pmyes it is the 57. i've NEVER had a problem with them. using them or needing to get them fixed.What about the weight fully extended do you find it manageable?I used a 40 ft gf daily a couple of years ago!
Beleive me you will hurt yourself in the end using a pole like that at that height.