This is an advertisementInterested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
I think that its better to have someone who can drive but can't clean windows than who can clean windows but can't drive. After all we can teach people to clean windows but not to drive. Plus you try telling someone that you want them to spend their cash on driving lessons, 9 times out of 10 it goes in one ear and out the other.
How much per hour do you pay for someone you have to train? also how many months do you consider for the training period? Or do you put them on a six month trial & training, then put the wage up?Ewan
Full clean licence, £7 ph training for two weeks, then out on their own in our van, 40% fully employed. Min holidays, ssp only, no money if rained off. £50 deduction on genuine callbacks. Works out around £22K pa gross for them.
Quote from: Christies on April 16, 2008, 12:28:27 pmFull clean licence, £7 ph training for two weeks, then out on their own in our van, 40% fully employed. Min holidays, ssp only, no money if rained off. £50 deduction on genuine callbacks. Works out around £22K pa gross for them.how can you have 40% fully emplyer, they are either employed or they are not £50 deduction is a little harse unless you have very large properies they will be cleaning every day, maybe the clean value, or they re clean in there own time. and lose bonus
£50 deduction came about out of experience. It used to be a deduction of the price of the clean, trouble was it didn't hurt too much and taken for granted. When you work out the true cost of a callback in time, aggravation, rescheduling, fuel, wear and tear on vehicle and equipment it is surprising. Small things and unfounded complaints don't attract the £50, but genuine problems do.Now we get quality work, happy incentivised staff and no callbacks.