No i can assure you Unger little about your product range and website as most of their development comes from Europe and US. I wouldn't compare them to Ionics, Ionics are hardly a big company in a global sense and everyone knows how paraniod they are about their brand. On that note why did you remove your findings on the Ionic poles? If everything is accurate how can they insist you take it down? Did they do they legal threat thing? How would they stand if the Which report got involved!!? 
Well you know about it and you and Unger are fairly friendly

As it says on our website, the statistical information regarding Ionics poles has been removed at their request. Whilst the information was completely accurate, it did not portray their products in the light that they obviously wanted them portrayed, hence they requested that we remove the information and reminded us of their success in litigation! I must admit this made me laugh as they would just be wasting their time, but, as it was not my intention to wind them up, I did remove the figures. I don't think this has done them any favours though, as everyone now knows that they don't want these statistics to be seen.
I always like to give credit where it's due though and Ionics conduct themselves in a very businesslike way. They have a very good approach to in-house production and development and market a very successful product. Their pole range seems to be of high quality and does the job it was designed to do although they are way too heavy for my personal use.
Obviously, our firm has a different approach to many other firms when it comes to products and product development but then that just adds to a bit of variety in the market place. It would be really boring if we all produced exactly the same products, marketed them and developed customer relations in exactly the same way - just like it would be boring if you didn't come on the Forum and give me a hard time

. I actually look forward to your posts, they make me grin.
