Over the past 18 months, I have read with interest your thoughts on WFP, and remember one of your posts/replies in particular, in which you said that WFP could never (consistently) achieve as good a result as a traditional clean done by someone who was experienced and proficient.
Do you still hold the above view now that you have gone over to WFP?
I use WFP on some properties with the following results:
On houses where the water runs down the glass in 'curtains' I find that minimal rinsing is necessary as all the dirt has run off during washing.
On houses where the water forms 'globules' on the glass during washing and rinsing I never feel confident that the windows will be to my satisfaction when they have dried.
I regularly go back to check and, though the customer is usually happy enough - I'm not!
I've read all the posts about 'rinse, rinse and rinse again' but it uses a heck of a lot of water (and you can still see spots if you look hard enough).
Most WFP users are happy to be working safely and too busy making money to worry about whether the finish is qute as good as with 'trad' - but, as long as the customer is happy - does it matter?
Do we agree on this???
Have you been able to put aside all reservations about WFP and go over to it 100%, including ground floor windows where ladders are not a requirement??
Look forward to your and anybody else's (honest) views.
Thanks
Mike