Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Biscute

  • Posts: 467
Would this work
« on: June 03, 2007, 02:25:20 pm »
I was just reading the same old threads and was woundering, if you fill your bucket with pure water then just mop it on and leave to dry would it work? I know on wfp u have to rinse, but maybe give it a quck blade down. I recon it could be goos on lead.
Dont argue with a retard, they will just pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.

jeff1

  • Posts: 5855
Re: Would this work
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2007, 02:28:54 pm »
I use pure water on the insides, a dash of squeegie off, mop and blade, you get very good results.

Biscute

  • Posts: 467
Re: Would this work
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2007, 02:38:55 pm »
i might start trying it, tbh i dont rate wfp at all i only use mine for awkward windows and conroofs, give me a mop and ladder any day i only got my system because people on here rave about how quick it is  :-\
Dont argue with a retard, they will just pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Re: Would this work
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2007, 03:06:13 pm »
Quote
Insert Quote
i might start trying it, tbh i dont rate wfp at all i only use mine for awkward windows and conroofs, give me a mop and ladder any day i only got my system because people on here rave about how quick it is

Why do you not rate WFP ?

Sir Squeaky

  • Posts: 8341
Re: Would this work
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2007, 03:27:49 pm »
I don't rate it for results compared to trad, but it's certainly usually good enough to get away with, and I'm definately making more money.

dai

  • Posts: 3503
Re: Would this work
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2007, 03:42:21 pm »
but it's certainly usually good enough to get away with, and I'm definately making more money.

And that Squeaks, is what it's all about. Historic words from the forums "ex "number one WFP sceptic. Dai

Mr. S

  • Posts: 418
Re: Would this work
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2007, 03:45:15 pm »
i started a thread the other week about applicating with pure water, and didnt get much response other than why not wfp it all.

I been using pure water downstairs for last week applicator and sqeegee with excellent results. Just use a new blade more often and on some days a very small squrt of fairy for slide. Hardly needed to use microfibre to wipe edges, mind you i do dogear too!

Biscute

  • Posts: 467
Re: Would this work
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2007, 04:51:13 pm »
I dont rate WFP because its a pain and i belive many people on this site overhype it. For the lucky persone that picks up a round with all good frames and good conditions windoes away from trees then go for it, it would be awsome. For me wfp on tree sap is a joke, wfp on bird muck and egg is also a joke and i also do some grade 2 listed geourgen houses wich end up takeing far to long and the frames just make the job unbarable for time and effort. I am only 23 and can fly up and down a ladder all day so speed wise its not as good as i tought and that was what i bought it for.
Dont argue with a retard, they will just pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Biscute

  • Posts: 467
Re: Would this work
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2007, 04:54:20 pm »
I dont realy see the point in using pure water and squeegee it off, you mays well use normal, you know it is about a 3 to 1 on the water you get. So thats a hell of a lot of waste water mate for somthink that does the same job.
Dont argue with a retard, they will just pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.

dave0123

  • Posts: 3553
Re: Would this work
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2007, 06:07:50 pm »
Biscute,

how long did you use your sustem before going back to the ladders?


Dave
Dave.

Paul Coleman

Re: Would this work
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2007, 06:29:21 pm »
I dont rate WFP because its a pain and i belive many people on this site overhype it. For the lucky persone that picks up a round with all good frames and good conditions windoes away from trees then go for it, it would be awsome. For me wfp on tree sap is a joke, wfp on bird muck and egg is also a joke and i also do some grade 2 listed geourgen houses wich end up takeing far to long and the frames just make the job unbarable for time and effort. I am only 23 and can fly up and down a ladder all day so speed wise its not as good as i tought and that was what i bought it for.

Yes.  Occasionally I need to attach a scraper to an Unger pole and have a little scrape around to hasten things.  It's very unusual though.

East coast window cleaning Services

  • Posts: 1458
Re: Would this work
« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2007, 06:54:59 pm »
I dont rate WFP because its a pain and i belive many people on this site overhype it. For the lucky persone that picks up a round with all good frames and good conditions windoes away from trees then go for it, it would be awsome. For me wfp on tree sap is a joke, wfp on bird muck and egg is also a joke and i also do some grade 2 listed geourgen houses wich end up takeing far to long and the frames just make the job unbarable for time and effort. I am only 23 and can fly up and down a ladder all day so speed wise its not as good as i tought and that was what i bought it for.

WFP is the future your never gonna progress without it mate
P&R Window Cleaning

Biscute

  • Posts: 467
Re: Would this work
« Reply #12 on: June 03, 2007, 09:12:10 pm »
Dont get me wrong it is ok, but thats all i still do use it but not for simple windoes. if it worked id rather run up a ladder mop the window up and straight back down and leave to dry but i was just woundering what it would dry like?
Dont argue with a retard, they will just pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.

dave0123

  • Posts: 3553
Re: Would this work
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2007, 09:34:28 pm »
try it on your own windows...

but crap i imagine!
Dave.