To generalise, all the low moisture systems used in the right environment, tend to exceed the expectations of the inexperienced LM cleaner.
When it comes to the brand you are talking of, why are you worried about only having the choice of Catalyst? Are you concerned about price and choice?
Again talking in general terms, many LM manufacturers have developed a cleaning SYSTEM. The pads, machine size, weight and other specifications, the chemistry and method of application all pay an important part in achieving the best results. To change one of these elements could well mean compromising on standards. So my advice would be to stick with Catalyst.
Something to bear in mind if you feel vulnerable to price movement with your cleaning solutions is this. With HWE, the costs per SqM are very high for labour and very low for chemical. Relatively speaking, because of the higher production rate for LM cleaning, labour is lower and chemicals higher. In most cases, LM cleaning is more productive and profitable than HWE. But you need the right environment for this to happen eg offices.
For myself, I use an LM system that has one of the higher material costs in the industry. But at the end of the day, it is by far and away the most profitable work I do.
Safe and happy cleaning

Ken