Why is this thread still going on and on beats me.
Can admin lock it down now please before it ends in tears. Ta very much
I think it's important that some of the "big hitters" explain why they arrive at the conclusion that Solar Steve's employment stat's are uneconomical. Shouldn't be too hard a task, it is after all, a very simple question. Maybe I was correct all along and more people than we give credit for really do not understand basic business? If you're gonna slam the guy down, at least give a credible explanation of your comments.
I'm not a "big hitter", but it' simple really. He's got 4 people running an office and 4 people generating revenue (allegedly). In my case we have two full time vans and one person able in 1-2 hours a week take care of payroll for 3, credit control, banking and so on. SS never mentioned the "approved contractors" until after I pointed out that it was ludicrous to have 4 in the office. But, if we include those contractors, let's say each of them does two large jobs a year (unlikely but for the sake of argument) that means someone has to book them in and pay their invoice. So 120 invoices to pay and some admin to schedule the work. I'd suggest that the one person currently doing 2 hours a week may now need to do 3 hours a week. But let's be generous and say it's 8 hours a week instead of 3. SS actually has 160 hours available in office resource if they are full time or 80 if part time. So he's paying somewhere between 10 & 20 times more than he needs to.
Add to that the obvious impracticality of having FOUR people working in a domestic residence w=every day then 4 (soon to be 5) people in and out through the day and you start to realise that it just doesn't add up.
And there I will leave it.
