Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

JackieW

  • Posts: 865
Remote v aquadapter
« on: January 15, 2012, 02:11:00 pm »
Typed this into search and nothing came up so I'm asking, Does anyone use a remote control for the battery operated pump, say around the neck on a pendant, and is it better than an aquadapter?

Ronnie Bryce

  • Posts: 1194
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2012, 02:13:22 pm »
I found them very inconsistent and annoying. The remote that is.

steven ainger

  • Posts: 1953
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2012, 02:16:24 pm »
Ive got a remote on a lanyard around my neck, and tbh, its cack.
10 yards range or if your lucky 20.
Tried the a/dapter, works well but too heavy on the end of a pole.
So use a small push fit tap on the bottom of the pole hose, works best for me

Window Washers

  • Posts: 9036
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2012, 02:56:10 pm »
why does people not use taps, no weight at the end of the pole, no messing about pressing a button pointing at your van and looking a fool.

Something dont need to be fixxed or added to.

The saying K.I.S.S springs to mind.

Please forward £80 and I will send you a long weight :)
If your not willing to learn, No one can help you, If you are determined to learn, No one can stop you ;)

steven ainger

  • Posts: 1953
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2012, 02:59:38 pm »
why does people not use taps, no weight at the end of the pole, no messing about pressing a button pointing at your van and looking a fool.

Something dont need to be fixxed or added to.

The saying K.I.S.S springs to mind.

Please forward £80 and I will send you a long weight :)



I do ;D

Window Washers

  • Posts: 9036
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2012, 03:02:18 pm »
why does people not use taps, no weight at the end of the pole, no messing about pressing a button pointing at your van and looking a fool.

Something dont need to be fixxed or added to.

The saying K.I.S.S springs to mind.

Please forward £80 and I will send you a long weight :)
are you being sarcastic again oh special one ?  :P



I do ;D
If your not willing to learn, No one can help you, If you are determined to learn, No one can stop you ;)

steven ainger

  • Posts: 1953
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2012, 03:04:08 pm »
no, not at all,  :o
just saying, ive tried all the other options and none of them are as good as a tap

jouk45

  • Posts: 2010
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2012, 03:48:46 pm »
i use a remote control daily for my backpack for near 2 years , can never be without it, cost just 7 quid from ebay then,

Window Washers

  • Posts: 9036
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2012, 03:56:36 pm »
no, not at all,  :o
just saying, ive tried all the other options and none of them are as good as a tap
;D
If your not willing to learn, No one can help you, If you are determined to learn, No one can stop you ;)

shina

  • Posts: 249
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2012, 04:12:06 pm »
I use a remote control and find it works great. I find that when it starts playing up I just replace the battery in the fob for a £1 and its fine for 6 months or so.
I use a trolley system with a long hose so it may work better than a van mount.


bumper

  • Posts: 872
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2012, 04:48:53 pm »
i have voice control i say on of on of but sometimes i have to say off off off then it turns off and other times i have to say off off oh f---it and drop the pole down to manualy ;D

Steve Sed

Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2012, 04:51:22 pm »
The constant leaks with a tap are a pain. Plus, the house is doubled over and more prone to twisting.

Window Washers

  • Posts: 9036
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2012, 04:57:01 pm »
The constant leaks with a tap are a pain. Plus, the house is doubled over and more prone to twisting.
you dont get constant leaks with a tap if used in a certain way, it is the fittings that leak not the tap  ;)
how is the hose doubled up ?
If your not willing to learn, No one can help you, If you are determined to learn, No one can stop you ;)

Steve Sed

Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #13 on: January 15, 2012, 05:01:00 pm »
True, it is the joints that leak. The hose is cut, then looped to the tap on the pole. At least mine is.

Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2012, 05:02:25 pm »
Top be effective you cannot use a normal remote, they do not work through walls and round corners. You need to be in view of the pump.

Smudger

  • Posts: 13459
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2012, 05:07:28 pm »
Used to have remotes and basically just a waste of time - slow to activate/stop pump


AD is the very best option for water control ( IMO )

Darran
Never argue with an idiot, they will only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience

Window Washers

  • Posts: 9036
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2012, 05:09:14 pm »
Used to have remotes and basically just a waste of time - slow to activate/stop pump


AD is the very best option for water control ( IMO )

Darran
Darran, can you limit the flow without turning off the AD ? if you cant a tap is the best to control the water.
if this can be done I will go by one, I thought it was just an on off switch at the end of a pole.
If your not willing to learn, No one can help you, If you are determined to learn, No one can stop you ;)

Smudger

  • Posts: 13459
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2012, 10:32:12 pm »
Yep - just turn the control numpty a small amount - but i see no reason to do so and as with a tap why fiddle and ponce about ? - just on or off - low water flow usually means (for me) bad cleans and spotting

i've used every method of water control (except triggers) and the AD suits the way i work and saves more water than using a  remote or tap (fitted to either end of the pole) there is nothing to drag about or 'loops' - no bending down to tap - i'm not tethered by a holster nor do i get wet through leaks etc...

AD is quick and effective - it may not suit every1 but for me i clean quicker - better and save water

Darran
Never argue with an idiot, they will only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience

Dave.

  • Posts: 557
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #18 on: January 16, 2012, 08:12:27 am »
I like the idea of an aquadapter, but the price puts me off.

I used to use a tap on the bottom of each pole with a loop of pole hose.

I now use a holster with a tap - from the tap fitting I have two lengths of pole hose with a male & female microbore fitting on either end. Easy to disconnect from either the hose or the pole - this works for me as I often use a 4' pole for ground floor work.

Now and again I'll get a leak somewhere around the tap & fittings - usually it's a jubilee clip that needs tightening.

I carry 4  wf poles in the van - didn't fancy spending over £300 for water control.

Each to their own I guess.

Dave

dazmond

  • Posts: 24425
Re: Remote v aquadapter
« Reply #19 on: January 16, 2012, 08:20:34 am »
just try one dave on your main pole.i really love the aqua-daptor for the views expressed by darran in his post above!

cracking bit of kit IMO.
price higher/work harder!