I thought you were a mate of Derek's on a wind up when you first posted. While I agree almost 100% with this post I've avoided being too confrontational as I'm known or assumed to provide a negative response to many posts on here.
Danger is.............
Your last post will be seen as confrontational and likely to start tit for tat arguments rather than opening the floor for debate.
I'm no mate of his. Robert, you think like the majority, that's the majority who just look in but don't post. For a so called 'organisation' (
) to tell lies at the outset is not best practise.
People miss read me with what I am saying. TACCA should be good, could be good for our industry but only if set up correctly now. You can't have one person (who barely has 'licked' a few carpets) running a one man band dictatorship style 'association' - that don't work.
TACCA should have been set up (like CLEAN was) with a proper formatting Committee that was transparent and was credible with 'Officer's' having been in the industry for a very long time on it to start with.
Derek has less than 4 years experience cleaning carpets whereby he and he alone is deciding on membership from applicants who have been in the business for 40 plus years or more. That don't work.
It's only the lost flock, the forum 'mates', the outcasts or ridiculers of the NCCA, that are being sucked into an artificial void.
By not answering the fundamental questions one poses from propective applicants on here certainly deters one and many others reading this thread from applying. Show some management skills (as you are managing TACCA alone) and answer the questions and also
tell us your plans to form such a National Committee? When are you going to have lawful Association status? Thanks, Phil.
