Actually it should perform better than that.
Peter Fogwill once told me that those RO's should be working at 97-98% efficiency.
We use one of Peter's RO's like yours with 150gpd membranes and in the old days our water TDS was 254 and it was working at about 99% leaving us with a TDS of 3 which he advised to use as it was without polishing it off. Our water pressure is 65psi and we don't use as booster pump.
Our water quality is much better now a whole lot of pipes have been replaced (TDS of 96) and our membranes are still fine although over 4 years old.
I was once told by Ro-man when we purchased these that the best membranes to get are the American manufactured ones rather than the cheaper Chinese/Korean ones, as they perform better.
The connection diagram from Cleancare was on the Ro-man site, but the system we got from Peter wasn't connected up the way of the diagram. The Ro-man diagram shows the waste from the first membrane being used as the water supply for the second, with the second's waste being the feed for the third membrane. This means that the third membrane is having to work with water that has the reject water from the previous membranes, so won't last as long as the first one as the water passing through that membrane will have a very much higher TDS than the tap water.
Peters Ro's had a splitter after the carbon filters that divided the water into 3 and feed each membrane with the same water ie in your case 265. Then each of the pure outlets were connected together as were the 3 waste outlets. IMO this is much better, although the pipework is more complicated.
Spruce
thanks for the reply spruce i did get my system from peter and my ro,s was connected like you said without using the waste to feed the other ro,s. i to think this way is much better but i was told feeding the ro,s with the waste bring down the tds so i swapped them back and got a higher tds of 23. so what do you think is better
1/ waste feed from 1 ro to the other or
2/ done with the splitter and feed them individually
i would have said 2 but the tds is higher. Dave