[Mike Halliday]

found this site interesting. I scored 77 but when i put in my competitor they only scored 14 but they are still well ranked just under me on the first page of google, so don't know how accurate it is

http://website.grader.com/

[JandS]

Scored 33.

John

[Mike Halliday]

75 views of this topic,  only one reply, some of you must have got some pretty crappy scores..... too embarrassed to post it

[Joe H]

Actually mine was so high I didnt want to embarrass anyone. 

Nah thats not right - 40

[Paul Evans]

score 53. not to bad only been up for about a month

[jasonl]

68 for one site, 53 for the other , most calls by far come from the one with the score of 53 .

[garry22]

75 views of this topic,  only one reply, some of you must have got some pretty crappy scores..... too embarrassed to post it 

Probably because it is inaccurate. It's finding things that are not there and missing things that are. Some of the stuff is irrelevant and some important stuff is not included. Have to say it looks impressive though, especially to small business owners

Still, it will be fun to get their emails every week.

[wayne zabel]

Ive done it twice,first time was 15 then 11.

I'm on the top of page 1 of google so why do I score so low?

[Jim_77]

I get far too much spam as it is, I'm not giving them my email address

[Mark Farrimond]

Jim,

You dont need to enter your email address to get your score.  Our site scored 56. Quite chuffed as i designed and built myself.

[davep]

Think it just compares your site against others it has previously checked -

(a website grade of 79/100 for Www.carpet-cleaning-Liverpool.co.uk means that of the millions of websites that have previously been evaluated, our algorithm has calculated that this site scores higher than 79% of them in terms of its marketing effectiveness)

[Steve Barnett (Carpet Care Plus)]

One of my sites scores 57, the other just 12.

I have no idea how relevant any of that is, I just know they bring in thousands of pounds worth of work each year.

[CARPET KNIGHTS]

Mine just got 80 and ranks in the top 25% of all sites for traffic!

Cheers Goron

[mark shannon]

76 

[garry22]

Ive done it twice,first time was 15 then 11.

I'm on the top of page 1 of google so why do I score so low?

Wayne,

Have a look at Steve's comment below...

One of my sites scores 57, the other just 12.

I have no idea how relevant any of that is, I just know they bring in thousands of pounds worth of work each year.

and ask yourself whether you would rather have that sort of result (or yours, top of page one) or would you like to score highly on someone's  "test" that's designed to suck you into signing up for ongoing SEO services?

Garry

[Mike Halliday]

garry i guess your score was pretty bad then

[Steve Gunn]

70

[garry22]

58, including saying how good the blog was (it does not exist) 

I then put in one of Mark's (DP) well optimised sites and it got a really low score.

[Mike Halliday]

i'd like to see an example of a +90 site to see what makes a good site in their eyes.

I thought it was strange that it said all my photos were too big so would cause loading problems I've never had a problem

[Mike Halliday]

this site scored 93

http://www.drynclean.com/

hope Rob Allen of TMF does'nt mind me posting it.