After seeing some tv ads recently it got me thinking about the moral high ground most lads on here seem to take, publically at least, when it comes to the sticky subject of undercutting.
Now, I've seen two major brands stating on tv ads that they will charge less for their services than any other; Natwest for example saying that they'll beat any like for like quote by £25 for home insurance ......... a blatent case of undercutting in my books.
So, were it possible to secure a good, well paying contract by charging slightly less than the other guy would you do it?
Would you undercut the guy to take the job; providing there was room to charge less without cutting your own throat?
My opinion is, if we're being totally honest with ourselves, you're dam right we would ........shock, horror :

I was asked recently to offer a quote for a leading retail chain in Plymouth. They have 4 stores in Plymouth, two of which we secured. The two stores in question thought the last cleaner was shoddy with his work and charged too much. It would seem that because he's had these stores for years and years he'd become lazy and failed to look after them. I knew what he charged because the store managers told me, rightly or wrongly, and offered a quote a couple of pounds less which were accepted.
Of course the guy wasn't happy and told me so; i wouldn't expect anything less, but my opinion is that if the stores were happy with his work I wouldn't have got a look in, not just for the sake of a couple of pounds per month

So, if in every other type of bussiness it's quite acceptable to undercut what makes the cleaning industry so different?
I await the slating with interest
