Well Im not a lier thank you for that.
Response rate and return on investment are 2 very different things. So If I spent 100k to deliver 1million leaflets and get 2 or 3 jobs per thousand that adds 200k to our yearly turnover. So thats a return of double what we spent. So to answer your questiontion I will keep paying year after year for such good results.
this has rankled with me. the miserable result.
i mean youre saying that if a leafleter doles out 1000 fliers ONLY 3 new customers result. yeh? my own experience is that is 2 days work by 1 man if its done properly . anyone who says a man can dole out 1000 in a day,day after day, is not somebody whose done the job or even supervised a leafletting effort
anyway,lets say the leafletter gets paid 40 quid a day ,this is low nobody will do it for long any lower than that. ok 40 quid for two days is 80 quid + the cost of the leaflets say 90 quid but youre only getting 3 customers at 15 quid each tops
and youre saying that result is acceptable?
the very worst leafletting effort i ever did/supervised was 500 put out and not 1 single call. most every other leafletting effort i did or supervised doing was 500 leaflets out for 10 new jobs in . i call that average but compared to you its spectacular
i know im not faking it and you say youre not either. something doesnt add up. my conclusion is that youre scatterbombing your leaflets not caring one jot where they land. spend a thousand pounds but 2 thousand is the end result?,
im not buying that
Your just not getting it are you.
You are looking at the completely wrong set of numbers.
Response rate means nothing!
Return on investment is the ONLY thing that matters.
Spend £100k (as I idid) get back £200k added to our annual business (as we did) = good results
You seems to be intent on calling me a lier, which is a bit weird to be honest. Why would I be lying? Why does it matter if you think things don't add up?
That's what we spent, that's what we got. End of really.
If you think a 200% return on investment seen within a 12 month period is a bad result then you really shouldn't be running a business. That's a bit laughable.
Well Im not a lier thank you for that.
Response rate and return on investment are 2 very different things. So If I spent 100k to deliver 1million leaflets and get 2 or 3 jobs per thousand that adds 200k to our yearly turnover. So thats a return of double what we spent. So to answer your questiontion I will keep paying year after year for such good results.
this has rankled with me. the miserable result.
i mean youre saying that if a leafleter doles out 1000 fliers ONLY 3 new customers result. yeh? my own experience is that is 2 days work by 1 man if its done properly . anyone who says a man can dole out 1000 in a day,day after day, is not somebody whose done the job or even supervised a leafletting effort
anyway,lets say the leafletter gets paid 40 quid a day ,this is low nobody will do it for long any lower than that. ok 40 quid for two days is 80 quid + the cost of the leaflets say 90 quid but youre only getting 3 customers at 15 quid each tops
and youre saying that result is acceptable?
the very worst leafletting effort i ever did/supervised was 500 put out and not 1 single call. most every other leafletting effort i did or supervised doing was 500 leaflets out for 10 new jobs in . i call that average but compared to you its spectacular
i know im not faking it and you say youre not either. something doesnt add up. my conclusion is that youre scatterbombing your leaflets not caring one jot where they land. spend a thousand pounds but 2 thousand is the end result?,
im not buying that
Your just not getting it are you.
You are looking at the completely wrong set of numbers.
Response rate means nothing!
Return on investment is the ONLY thing that matters.
Spend £100k (as I idid) get back £200k added to our annual business (as we did) = good results
You seems to be intent on calling me a lier, which is a bit weird to be honest. Why would I be lying? Why does it matter if you think things don't add up?
That's what we spent, that's what we got. End of really.
If you think a 200% return on investment seen within a 12 month period is a bad result then you really shouldn't be running a business. That's a bit laughable.
Lee.
When you say you spent 100k and got 200k back is that 200k in new customer first cleans or 200k in total revenue over the year?
I totally agree with you, from what i m reading, people are to hooked up on what the return rate is reference customer, It has nothing to do with how many customers reply to the advertising, It is about how much money it beings in, You could get 100 replies from 10000 at £20, which brings in £2000, or get 50 replies at £50, which brings in £2500. For the last 3 years i have been using Royal mail to delivery my leaflets, this year 38000 were delivered over a two week period, it cost to print 38000 bye solo press £450 and £2100 for royal mail to delivery so combined outlay £2550, i did an income forecast before the flyers went out, and that was first week of April, we are now only in the middle of May and the income forecast is already £10,000 more, if you take away the cost of advertising thats already £7400 profit, and its only May, and from experience you can probably add another £10000 bye the end of the year. i would also add the more strings to your bow the greater the return. i do mainly window cleaning, but when i advertise its pressure washing, patios drives, fsg, conservatoires, render cleaning. I pick up just as many window cleaning customers after doing the other bits, as i do just getting calls from people wanting there windows cleaned. Look professional, work professional, be professional. Dont turn up to clean someones patio with the B and Q £99 bank holiday special pressure washer.. Must dash of to a new customer today windows conservatory fsg and patio clean, its a long day but for £350 hey ho itsssss Friday, as Del Boy says LOVERLY JUBERLY.
