Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2015, 11:23:49 pm »
2 ml per 100 litres wfp .   1.5 ml per gallon trad at 1.3p per ml cheap as chips and does lovely job on gutters etc mixed at 30 ml per litre . Can do whole house by hand for less than 50p
Do not steal the government hates competition

Dave Willis

Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #21 on: November 28, 2015, 11:28:32 pm »
Any reason why it's 2ml per litre? Does it foam at all?

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #22 on: November 28, 2015, 11:38:11 pm »
That's what I found works best for me Its so concentrated don't need any more may be able to use less no foaming at all . If using for trad will bubble up in water just like other detergents but soon disappears and no bubbles on glass when applied with applicator
Do not steal the government hates competition

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #23 on: November 28, 2015, 11:45:59 pm »
Not aggressive like some chemicals I have never used virosol but could you clean windows with it .
Do not steal the government hates competition

Dave Willis

Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #24 on: November 29, 2015, 07:43:16 am »
What size containers and how much inc postage?
Do you get a free waffle cloth?

I hear it's a load of metabollics - what is that exactly?

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #25 on: November 29, 2015, 08:06:56 am »
Yes full of metabolics but don't ask me to explain it only know it works .
Cost inc delivery I think is £49 for 1 US gallon but check that with Tadgh. No free waffle cloth included
Do not steal the government hates competition

Dave Willis

Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #26 on: November 29, 2015, 08:13:02 am »
 :o :o :o  fifty quid!

I think I'll risk napalming myself with Virosol for nine quid a can thanks.

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #27 on: November 29, 2015, 08:17:00 am »
If I thought it was rubbish or Tadgh was dodgey I would be first to say so .
I just wanted something to clean gutters without causing damage elsewhere so got some nuclean then thought whats it like as an additive to wfp and in bucket for trad not stopped using it since . If there is something that does all round cleaning as good as this that's cheaper ml for ml I would happily swap .
Do not steal the government hates competition

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #28 on: November 29, 2015, 08:20:01 am »
how many 3 bed houses can you get out of a £9 can and then you have to buy something else for cleaning windows
Do not steal the government hates competition

Dave Willis

Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #29 on: November 29, 2015, 08:33:29 am »
As an additive at 2ml per 100l then it's ok I suppose. Provided it does the job then it would last me years. However, for removing algae I think it's too expensive for 3.7L

dd

  • Posts: 2623
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #30 on: November 29, 2015, 08:55:12 am »
You can give a fool a tool, but at the end of the day you've only got a fool with atool.   ;D
I do not normally have a problem with removing bird strikes as long as I make sure I give them an extra scrub. Only problem normally is if I fail to see one so it does not get the extra scrub.

I have been wfp for nearly 10 years and have enough customers who would tell me if i missed a bird strike.

I do like to be thorough which is why I check over some of my work when using a new brush.

The fact you choose to be insulting tells me all I need to know about you 8 weekly.


Clever Forum Name

  • Posts: 5942
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #31 on: November 29, 2015, 09:03:47 am »
Haven't read the thread, just ran to the van and chucked them grenade style over the fence and waited for a bang  ??? ???

Spruce

  • Posts: 8645
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #32 on: November 29, 2015, 09:19:54 am »
If I thought it was rubbish or Tadgh was dodgey I would be first to say so .
I just wanted something to clean gutters without causing damage elsewhere so got some nuclean then thought whats it like as an additive to wfp and in bucket for trad not stopped using it since . If there is something that does all round cleaning as good as this that's cheaper ml for ml I would happily swap .

I agree. Its not as slippy as soap in the water if using a squeegee (at height in our case) but it it leaves very little residual on the glass that a microfiber cloth/towel easily addresses. (We use 3 poles; 1 with applicator, 1 with squeegee and 3rd with Unger Fixi clamp and cloth.)

Did the inside of a pub yesterday and it did a good job as usual using microfiber clothes.

At height we still use a squeegee due to the size of each glass panel in a contract we do every 3 months. We do the internal glass in the building and another company does the external and internal of the external glass. Ours is streak free and theirs inside is a mess due to the soap they use.
Success is 1% inspiration, 98% perspiration and 2% attention to detail!

The older I get, the better I was ;)

Dave Willis

Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #33 on: November 29, 2015, 09:22:02 am »
I didn't know you were using it? Obviously you are impressed?

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #34 on: November 29, 2015, 09:47:49 am »
algae is no problem will even remove litchen from conny roofs with a stiff brush knocked some undiluted accidently into my fish pond fish still ok
Do not steal the government hates competition

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #35 on: November 29, 2015, 09:56:28 am »
Too expensive how many average houses do you get out of a £9 can of virosol by hand by my calculations reckon I prob will get about 100
Do not steal the government hates competition

G Griffin

  • Posts: 40745
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #36 on: November 29, 2015, 10:07:40 am »
I have been wfp for nearly 10 years and have enough customers who would tell me if i missed a bird strike.
My customers usually use the three strike rule: miss three bird strikes and you're gone. 

Spruce (or Tadgh), is there sufficient glide when tradding by hand rather than pole work?
Cheers.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Tadgh O Shea

Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #37 on: November 29, 2015, 02:18:15 pm »
I have been wfp for nearly 10 years and have enough customers who would tell me if i missed a bird strike.
My customers usually use the three strike rule: miss three bird strikes and you're gone. 

Spruce (or Tadgh), is there sufficient glide when tradding by hand rather than pole work?
Cheers.
Yes nice glide for tradding by hand about 2 to 4ml of concentrate into 5000ml of water in your bucket, the difference when using metabolic chemistry is that it wont dry out leaving any residues behind on what ever type of surface you are cleaning with it.  even though this technology was developed for the food service industry, we are getting great feedback from clients who work in all different sectors of the cleaning industry, for anyone who would like more info its worth checking out  www.intinsiti.com 

paulben

  • Posts: 1041
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #38 on: November 29, 2015, 02:35:25 pm »
Have a pic of Nuclean on window frame but how do I reduce picture quality so I can post it on here
Do not steal the government hates competition

dd

  • Posts: 2623
Re: WARNING: Supreme brush users
« Reply #39 on: November 29, 2015, 04:31:30 pm »
Haven't read the thread, just ran to the van and chucked them grenade style over the fence and waited for a bang  ??? ???
Sorry. I forgot to add they only explode with prolonged exposure to direct sunlight.

Maybe I take work too seriously and get overly disappointed if I have not done a good job. Rather veer to that extreme than the other though.