This is an advertisementInterested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Quote from: The Number 23 on January 30, 2015, 05:31:59 pmQuote from: GrippaTank on January 30, 2015, 05:19:23 pmQuote from: The Number 23 on January 30, 2015, 04:09:39 pmThanks, back to the drawing board me thinks Let us know how we can help - i feel a Mini The Number 23 roller setup coming along You can start by getting my finance request emailed over I will chase the guys up for you - we are snowed under with quotes
Quote from: GrippaTank on January 30, 2015, 05:19:23 pmQuote from: The Number 23 on January 30, 2015, 04:09:39 pmThanks, back to the drawing board me thinks Let us know how we can help - i feel a Mini The Number 23 roller setup coming along You can start by getting my finance request emailed over
Quote from: The Number 23 on January 30, 2015, 04:09:39 pmThanks, back to the drawing board me thinks Let us know how we can help - i feel a Mini The Number 23 roller setup coming along
Thanks, back to the drawing board me thinks
650ltrs in that I wouldn't think so
Quote from: NWH on January 30, 2015, 10:48:37 pm650ltrs in that I wouldn't think so240 LWB has a payload of 1003 kg650 is fine Mr B[/quCourse it's fine 650kg still got 353kg spare
1003kg-650kg for water-90kg for tank and frameLeaving 263kg for everything else.
In theory and the maths might add up but not when driving it,I had the old connect and now have a T5 transporter and you still know when you have 650 full up in the back although it actually drives better with more weight in the back. The smaller vans with bigger tanks in the back wear tyres out quicker and eat through discs and pads