It is unfortunate Dave that your issues would appear to have been caused simply by someone not crimping a cable correctly during the manufacture process, As you can imagine with each control using at least 4 crimps the workshop team are getting through 10,s of 1000,s of crimps. I will bring this to the attention of the production team.
We use the PS message for two things
1. Pump pressure Switch activation
2. Checking the pump is in circuit.
Having eliminated any possible high pressure issue, Next step is to check the cables and connectors.
http://www.springltd.co/node/48The controller carries out an electrical test to see if the pump is in circuit if the control can not detect the pump We use PS as a default message.
Second.
In answer to the question and comments all the developments from V1 to the current V11 are market driven, Cleaners, system builders and distributors feed back to us what they like and don,t The Low battery cut off over ride feature on the V11 is a direct consequence of this feed back.
Spring are an electronics design and build company over the 10 year cycle with have gained a great deal of insight into what the controls need to do, This insight has quickened greatly through my direct contact with guys on the ground, I spend large amounts of time just listening and provide advise as needed, I am very grateful to all who contribute to this process no matter their point of view.
So are controls a waste of money?
My personal feeling is for a pump delivery system to work as efficiently as possible electronically controlling the pump is the way to go.
Slowing the pump will not massively impact on flow to the brush. This is because of pressure dynamics with in the system. Slowing the pump and controlling the flow is just one aspect of the controller.
What the control will do is get the pump to produce only the water flow required at the brush. It also reduces heat build up in the pump, reduces wear on the pump motor, In turn this means you use less current. A control helps you manage your resource.
Personally I am not convinced running a pump flat out pushing max water and draw max current, putting the whole system under high pressure just to restrict the flow with a manual tap is efficient.
Over Three years I have run all kinds of tests and comparisons with/without a control and in all cases with a control is better.
That said I respect that people have to work in a way that best suits them, It is then our job as a manufacturer to produce what the market wants.
Fair play to Gordon still having a V1 going strong, This shows the resilience of the kit, The V11 Analogue was aimed to fill this slot if people feel it is to complex well maybe we should re visit it.
This may surprise people but I would rather some one had any electronic controller rather than no controller. Having a control even the most basic ones will make your system more efficient.
To my way of thinking a controller is not a waste of money but a valuable asset that adds value to your system. The market provides a very wide range of controls and depending on how much function you want there is something to suit.
This is a link to a number of articles on our web site, They are written with the view that any control is better than no control.
http://www.springltd.co/node/3