Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Window Lickers

  • Posts: 2196
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #140 on: May 11, 2014, 10:53:21 am »
That's what should happen to half the police force. Now.
Liberace's ex looking to meet well built men for cottaging meets.

Soupy

  • Posts: 21263
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #141 on: May 11, 2014, 10:54:39 am »
What, sack em or send them to Mars?
#FreeTheBrightonOne
#aliens

Window Lickers

  • Posts: 2196
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #142 on: May 11, 2014, 10:54:42 am »
Especially them PCSOs. They're all drunks themselves.  ;D
Liberace's ex looking to meet well built men for cottaging meets.

Window Lickers

  • Posts: 2196
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #143 on: May 11, 2014, 10:55:00 am »
What, sack em or send them to Mars?

Mars.
Liberace's ex looking to meet well built men for cottaging meets.

Dean Taberner

  • Posts: 4164
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #144 on: May 11, 2014, 10:55:17 am »
That's what should happen to half the police force. Now.

If that's your stance Matt, what should happen to window cleaners who don't change their squeegee rubbers on a regular basis then?
Operations manager at J.V Price Ltd

http://www.thepricegroup.co.uk

Dean Taberner

  • Posts: 4164
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #145 on: May 11, 2014, 10:55:56 am »
Especially them PCSOs. They're all drunks themselves.  ;D

What's a PSCO?
Operations manager at J.V Price Ltd

http://www.thepricegroup.co.uk

Soupy

  • Posts: 21263
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #146 on: May 11, 2014, 10:57:03 am »
#FreeTheBrightonOne
#aliens

Dean Taberner

  • Posts: 4164
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #147 on: May 11, 2014, 10:58:08 am »
Operations manager at J.V Price Ltd

http://www.thepricegroup.co.uk

Soupy

  • Posts: 21263
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #148 on: May 11, 2014, 11:00:23 am »
#FreeTheBrightonOne
#aliens

Window Lickers

  • Posts: 2196
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #149 on: May 11, 2014, 11:01:01 am »
Especially them PCSOs. They're all drunks themselves.  ;D

What's a PSCO?

A dyslexic PCSO.   ;D
Liberace's ex looking to meet well built men for cottaging meets.

Dean Taberner

  • Posts: 4164
Operations manager at J.V Price Ltd

http://www.thepricegroup.co.uk

Window Lickers

  • Posts: 2196
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #151 on: May 11, 2014, 11:01:47 am »
That's what should happen to half the police force. Now.

If that's your stance Matt, what should happen to window cleaners who don't change their squeegee rubbers on a regular basis then?

Convert to WFP.
Liberace's ex looking to meet well built men for cottaging meets.

Dean Taberner

  • Posts: 4164
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #152 on: May 11, 2014, 11:02:22 am »
C3PO??
Operations manager at J.V Price Ltd

http://www.thepricegroup.co.uk

Mick Kent

  • Posts: 1380
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #153 on: May 11, 2014, 11:47:38 am »
I dont get it, if crime is going down then why are our prisons so overcrouded??.
Is it that population has risen so much from 1981 to present so the ratio has changed to the amount of law abiding people vs the criminals?
Im not convinced crime is dropping as it seems to be getting worse from my eyes although that survey says different! but hey ho just an opinion.

Soupy

  • Posts: 21263
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #154 on: May 11, 2014, 11:50:17 am »
Prisons are closing. I reckon you perceive crime to be worse because of the media and social media in particular.
#FreeTheBrightonOne
#aliens

Paul Coleman

Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #155 on: May 11, 2014, 12:32:06 pm »
I just checked a relevant website.  It appears that the prison population at a given point in 2013 was 84,000.  It is reasonable to assume that it didn't vary too much either way during all of 2013.  Many years ago (possibly about 30), I remember that there was some concern in the media that the prison population was approaching 40,000.
Of course this doesn't necessarily mean that there is more crime.  It may just mean that people are locked up more easily.  Or it could mean that there is less crime generally but that there is more serious crime.  Another angle may be that there are more repeat offenders - assuming that repeat offenders are more likely to be banged up than first time or one-off offenders.  It may even mean that sentences are generally longer - or it could mean that there is more crime but that statistics have been manipulated.
Whichever it is, I mistrust any statistics that have been formulated by any parties that have a vested interest in making the numbers look higher or lower than reality.  Depending on who it is, there are advantages to be gained by cooking the books in either direction.

SeanK

Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #156 on: May 11, 2014, 12:46:09 pm »
Exactly look at the employment figures according to statistics they are also falling.
But what they fail to mention is that a zero hour contract takes you of the list even through
you could still be getting full benefits.
That why the government wants to force the unemployed to take them as it would reduce the statistics
even further.
O look us nice Torries have reduced unemployment to one million but keep it to yourself as we still pay benefits
to over five million.

richywilts

  • Posts: 4262
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #157 on: May 11, 2014, 01:26:29 pm »


When was the government ruling?  That may answer your question.

Soon after they came to power.

Also, prison number have been steadily increasing for years despite the last governments efforts to do the same.

Prison numbers in one sense only are an easy statistic as it's a straight forwards head count.

Maybe the larger prison population helps accounts for some of the falling crime rate?

The prisons are 1% from full capacity at minute absolutely heaving they've had to open 3 old prisons back up
Richard Wiltshire
Window Clean Direct

richardwiltshire36@yahoo.co.uk
www.windowcleandirect.co.uk
07894821844

Perfect Windows

  • Posts: 4303
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #158 on: May 11, 2014, 01:27:23 pm »
Whichever it is, I mistrust any statistics that have been formulated by any parties that have a vested interest in making the numbers look higher or lower than reality.  Depending on who it is, there are advantages to be gained by cooking the books in either direction.

From the report preamble for the crime figure data:

"Since it began, the CSEW has been conducted by an independent (from government or the police)
survey research organisation using trained interviewers to collect data from sampled respondents.
The interviewers have no vested interest in the results of the survey. For the crime types and
population groups it covers, the CSEW has a consistent methodology and is unaffected by changes
in levels of public reporting to the police, recording practice or police activity. As such, the survey is
widely seen to operate as an independent reality-check of the police figures. The independence of
the survey has been further strengthened by the transfer of responsibility from the Home Office to
the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in April 2012."


So it's formulated by someone with no axe to grind.  Either way.

Vin

Window Lickers

  • Posts: 2196
Re: Ritchie...
« Reply #159 on: May 11, 2014, 01:29:50 pm »
O look us nice Torries have reduced unemployment to one million but keep it to yourself as we still pay benefits
to over five million.

Whilst labour would pay benefits to twice that and have 3 times that out of work. With no money left in the coffers to boot!
Liberace's ex looking to meet well built men for cottaging meets.