[H20cleaning]

Well it says underage  so we know from that.
But having read the article 3 or 4 times now its quite clear he is guilty and possibly more people could come forward now its out there?
Jesus i cant believe it me

[G Griffin]

The law says 15 year olds are not ready to decide whether they are in love or should be sexually active.
And hiring a motorhome sounds dodgy, at best. Sound familiar?
I thought I'd mention him before Geoff Lord did.

[robertphil]

jimmy savile had a motorhome.  i had a dinner plate that was jimmy saviles, sold it  after the scandal ,to an ebayer name of  red666   , these paedos are everywhere

[H20cleaning]

How many years you think he will get??

[Jonny 87]

Don't get me wrong, if he is guilty then he deserves all he gets,

But is there any proof other than the two girls stories?

I'm guessing their must be as he has been found guilty.

[H20cleaning]

Not to sure tbh thats exacly what i said about
The kevin webster thing, whats the point in trying to find evidance 20-30 years later it just wasnt gunna happen.
However the police must have something on this man

[Jonny 87]

I find it scary to think they might just be going on two womens stories.

Imagine if in the two girls were just really hurt that he didn't "marry" either of them, and have plotted together to ruin this guys life, and in fact they were 18 when he slept with them as his story says. It's his story versus theirs.

Nothing worse than a woman scorned and it's been known to happen.

I'm sure the police must have more evidence though. Must be more than meets the eye.

[H20cleaning]

I initionally thought this because the man has a few boxing gyms, sunbed
Shops a 400k house loads of land....
But the more i think about it the police must have more evidence

[Jonny 87]

Although what evidence can they have from so Long ago?

Mayb he tried to hide things in his story and got found out etc.

[Tom White]

He's been found guilty by a jury of his peers who found him guilty based on the evidence they were shown.

He would've had a defence counsel too.

He'll be guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

[AuRavelling79]

He's been found guilty by a jury of his peers who found him guilty based on the evidence they were shown.

He would've had a defence counsel too.

He'll be guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Quite right.