I have to agree with Kev on this, if there was to be test or head to head, it really should be on an unprepared surface, preferably somewhere neutral. Going over floors that have be done many times previously doesn't prove much.
Personally I would have chosen a cheap and nasty marble from somewhere like Tile Giant as a test, opposed to a nice stone like nero. My reasoning behind this is because cheaper stone is invariably heavily filled and a conglomerate of stone which polishes to different levels. It can be a pain to polish, reduces a systems reliance on polishing powders and can fracture very easily when de-lipping, which is also a good test of selected diamonds.
While I'm all for advancements in technology and working practices, I can't see this system immediately falling into place with my business model. I offer two systems, a (up to) four pad rhino polish for more economical projects, and a premium grind and polish up to 10000 grit resin for the more discerning customer. Maybe in time the cheetahs would fall between these?
My clientele actually revel in the fact they have guys taking lots of time and effort to achieve the finish, and get a kick out of seeing us detailing on our knees. I suppose it massages their egos a little?
Let's hope we can still see a head to head, or maybe a stone rodeo? That would be nice, get us all down, lay on a few drinks, bowls of chilli, nacho's, a bit of local media coverage and above all have some fun
