This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Jamie Pearson

  • Posts: 3407
Re: Cimex
« Reply #20 on: May 02, 2012, 12:13:05 pm »
CR38 is 620rpm
CRS38 is 400 rpm

The 620rpm model is intended for polishing works.

gwrightson

  • Posts: 3617
Re: Cimex
« Reply #21 on: May 02, 2012, 01:17:42 pm »
Paul,
What type are the cimex brushes you have tons of , i could do with a spare set if price is right .

Geoff
who ever said dont knock before u try ,i never tried dog crap but i know i wouldnt like  haha

Jamie Pearson

  • Posts: 3407
Re: Cimex
« Reply #22 on: May 02, 2012, 02:20:05 pm »
Are these shampoo brushes?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Cimex-brush-heads-/221006812016?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item3375085370

Shaun

They will work after bedding them in on tarmac/concrete for half an hour or so.
The shampoo brushes normally have a little clear plastic difuser in the centre to throw the shampoo out towards the bristles.

Jamie Pearson

  • Posts: 3407
Re: Cimex
« Reply #23 on: May 02, 2012, 02:21:42 pm »
jamie what you got in six inches as I have a ton of 8 inch brush stock I'll swap you think there about 12 or more horse hair to poly brushes

I dont actually have any 6" stock but would order them in for a swap on a set of CR48 brushes for use on my own machines.

mark_roberts

  • Posts: 1899
Re: Cimex
« Reply #24 on: May 02, 2012, 05:32:00 pm »
Ok so too fast for carpets then.  Apart from a label, thats now gone, is there anyway of telling if its the slow machine.

For commercial office tile when would pads be better or worse than brushes?

thanks
Mark

Jamie Pearson

  • Posts: 3407
Re: Cimex
« Reply #25 on: May 02, 2012, 08:02:01 pm »
Pads will always work better than brushes. Think pot scourer vs dish washing brush.

On commercial tile go for pads every time.

It's only when you have a broadloom in a hotel or similar that you may consider brushes due to pile distortion that may be caused by the pads.

Always do a quick m2 test before charging ahead.

mark shannon

  • Posts: 961
Re: Cimex
« Reply #26 on: June 09, 2012, 08:00:28 am »
Mark been asking around on the US encap forums and many have used the 620rpm CR38 on commercial for years with no problem.

Hope this is correct as have just bought a used 38 from ebay and like you have no clue as to what rpm version it is.

mark shannon

  • Posts: 961
Re: Cimex
« Reply #27 on: June 09, 2012, 05:09:59 pm »
Pad driver link for CR38.

Jamie Pearson

  • Posts: 3407
Re: Cimex
« Reply #28 on: June 09, 2012, 05:11:27 pm »
I can sort them and have 6" pads in stock for Encap work.

mark shannon

  • Posts: 961
Re: Cimex
« Reply #29 on: June 09, 2012, 05:50:48 pm »
Thanks Jamie picked some up from ebay

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/350359077532?_trksid=p5197.c0.m619#ht_600wt_1135

Think these are correct and half the price Truvox wanted.

Jamie will call monday for encap pads will you soon be stocking the Fibreplus pads ;).

Cheers Mark

Jamie Pearson

  • Posts: 3407
Re: Cimex
« Reply #30 on: June 10, 2012, 07:47:42 pm »
Fibre plus only come in 8" I think. Will double check.

Mike Halliday

  • Posts: 11578

AshWhite

  • Posts: 3427
Re: Cimex
« Reply #32 on: June 12, 2012, 08:57:49 pm »
Just added a Cimex to for sale section if anyone is after one, its the 48 model
Carpet Cleaning http://www.floors2show.co.uk
Google Adwords Management http://www.pagecrest.co.uk

Brendan (chem2clean)

  • Posts: 958
Re: Cimex
« Reply #33 on: June 13, 2012, 12:05:11 am »
Are the cimex s much quicker on commercial that a ordinary rotary. I clean a bank hq and i m thinking this machine look s ideal.

K.O. Glanville

  • Posts: 82
Re: Cimex
« Reply #34 on: June 13, 2012, 02:19:51 pm »
Are the cimex s much quicker on commercial that a ordinary rotary. I clean a bank hq and i m thinking this machine look s ideal.

Are you using a porty; locked inside the bank, or a t/m sitting outside.??

It really doesn't matter, (apart from the security aspect, I.M.H.O.).

If you are cleaning commercial carpet, I would say that 99.999% of the time, not only will the Cimex give you a better result, (especially on polyprops:),  but will also be quicker.

The following is strictly my honest opinion, others may disagree, but that's okay.  ;D

Benefits of a Cimex:

Quicker set-up and break-down times.
Quicker dry times.
Less chance of wick-backs.
Less chance of opening a bad seam.
Much less chance of over-wetting the carpet.
Less chance of damp carpet next day.
Less chance of odour problems when dry.
Less chance of condensation on the windows.
Much quieter, and no odour compared to a porty; working in the same area.
Much less security problems being due to the machine being inside with no unlocked doors/windows.
Of course, all of the above also relates directly to the solution that one may be using in regard to odours.

Downside:

Occasionally, the carpet may need to be extracted to remove any build-up of deep down soils.

That's it, I'm stumped.

Shorty.

Jamie Pearson

  • Posts: 3407
Re: Cimex
« Reply #35 on: June 13, 2012, 02:38:50 pm »
Benefits of a Cimex:

Quicker set-up and break-down times.
Quicker dry times.
Less chance of wick-backs.
Less chance of opening a bad seam.
Much less chance of over-wetting the carpet.
Less chance of damp carpet next day.
Less chance of odour problems when dry.
Less chance of condensation on the windows.
Much quieter, and no odour compared to a porty; working in the same area.
Much less security problems being due to the machine being inside with no unlocked doors/windows.
Of course, all of the above also relates directly to the solution that one may be using in regard to odours.

Downside:

Occasionally, the carpet may need to be extracted to remove any build-up of deep down soils.


I agree with them all apart from your downside. Modern encapsulation products wont find this a problem.

Brendan (chem2clean)

  • Posts: 958
Re: Cimex
« Reply #36 on: June 13, 2012, 03:05:35 pm »
sounds like i want one off these machines.Yes locked inside the banks hq,must be lots they want kept secret because they dont even have money in there.Thanks

K.O. Glanville

  • Posts: 82
Re: Cimex
« Reply #37 on: June 13, 2012, 10:17:03 pm »
Quote from: K.O. Glanville

Downside:

Occasionally, the carpet may need to be extracted to remove any build-up of deep down soils.

[/quote

I agree with them all apart from your downside. Modern encapsulation products wont find this a problem.


I know where you're coming from.  ;)

I've been cleaning a travel centre, located at the entrance to a food court, in a large busy shopping centre for nine years with the 'Mex;.

I've been doing this every MONTH.

To date, I have not extracted this carpet.

Good solutions are a must.

Shorty.

mark shannon

  • Posts: 961
Re: Cimex
« Reply #38 on: June 13, 2012, 10:49:41 pm »
What encap chem do you use Shorty?

,ark

K.O. Glanville

  • Posts: 82
Re: Cimex
« Reply #39 on: June 14, 2012, 03:13:18 am »
I use a Queensland made "Woolsafe approved" product from Sonitron called Zenith mostly.

I also use a Sonitron product called Chemox, which is based on h2O2 for cellulosic browning stains, coffee, etc;.

Sometimes I use Releasit Punch for some spotting of problem areas.

I very much doubt you can buy these (Sonitron products), in the U.K.

This will probably be all as clear as mud to you blokes, which is just how I feel trying to comprehend your local products.  ;)

Shorty.