As far as I believe using 2 di will not save resin as all you are doing is spreading the load over two which one will normally do. Two di will stop the quick rise in in TDs but not reduce the costs.
Reasoning for two DIs is:
Let's say the input is TDS020 (the number doesn't matter, really, the argument is the same). Have the DI vessels in series, call them A and B respectively. Once output TDS gets to 001, the resin in vessel A is completely shagged and B is starting to go off. At that point, replace resin in A and reverse the order of the vessels. Now vessel B is still outputting at 001 then 002, then 003, up to 020, but you're still getting value out of that resin as it's extending the life of the resin in vessel A (It's working on lower TDS water until the resin in B is completely saturated).
Compare that to having a single DI vessel: In that case, when TDS = 001, you're slinging it all out rather than getting any further use out of it.
Before anyone jumps in, where I've said TDS 001, the actual level at which you dispose of your resin doesn't matter, the principle is the same. In fact, if you think about it, once you're using two resin vessels, rejigging them at TDS 001 doesn't cost you a penny more in resin than refilling at a TDS of 010, so another benefit is that you can always use completely pure (rather than some arbitrary limit) at no extra cost to you.
I don't think that 2xDI will halve your resin costs but it will certainly cut them significantly.
Vin