Yes, dmlservices. You're absolutely right. And with there being so many variables (viscosity, density and surface tension against temperature) the analysis would be horrendous.
Just as a point of interest:
* one variable against temperature would give you a line graph - 2-dimensions.
* two variables against temperature would give you a surface graph - 3-dimensions.
* three variables against temperature would give you a graph that you couldn't draw or even imagine - 4-dimensions. Although you could construct an empirical/experimental/mathematical model, you couldn't say what it looks like!
And no. Pure water boils at 100oC.
And I can sympathise with ftp. I nearly soiled myself the other day as a similar thing happened and the end connector banged into a conservatory door hitting the glass with a real whack. Luckily, no damage.
And yes, Scud, you're right about the very low conductivity of pure water. It is completely deionised, and it's the ions in impure water that conduct the electricity, not the water. No ions => no conductivity.