[Mike 108]

A good example, Alex.

WFP looks more 'professional' and 'up-to-date' for the larger jobs and has some advantages for other types of property also - but I'm convinced that you have to use more water and spend more time on the job than some of its 'fans' admit.

And its biggest disadvantage is that, most times, the cleaner is not there when the windows have dried to see the results - so he can't rectify them.

That is why cleaners get complaints and why some concientious/perfectionist cleaners aren't 'madly in love' with WFP and are not in denial about some of the 'problems' associated with it.

Mike

[SherwoodCleaningSe]

I find the results of wfp are much better with warmer water.  If you have a cold water system the results will be poorer in the winter when the water is stone cold.  You may still leave the odd small spot though.

I think you can achieve perfect results with a squeegee, however that is only with clean water, after ten houses the water in the bucket starts to get a little gray no matter what solution you use and will only leave a near perfect result.  In direct sunlight it will not look good.

I think you really need both tools to offer a full service.

Simon.

[Mike 108]

Simon

Well said, and I agree.

Mike