Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: Super-Lite Video & 2 New Videos!!
« Reply #40 on: March 01, 2007, 09:20:31 pm »
Thanks PJ for posting the link.


poole bay

  • Posts: 644
Re: Super-Lite Video & 2 New Videos!!
« Reply #41 on: March 07, 2007, 07:46:02 pm »
the poles that you are showing are not on the website the ones on there are heavy ???

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: The Super-Lite Video
« Reply #42 on: March 10, 2007, 06:06:23 pm »
Hi Carl,

Look under the section WaterFed Poles, fourth section down is the Super-Lite poles, look under the heading Super-Lite Pole assemblies gives you prices and weights.

U.S. wfp USER

  • Posts: 313
Re: The Super-Lite Video
« Reply #43 on: March 11, 2007, 01:59:24 am »
If you buy a 60'er do you essentially have a 5' to 60'er?

Thanks.
Shawn Gavin
Reach Higher Ground

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: The Super-Lite Video
« Reply #44 on: March 11, 2007, 06:27:35 am »
That is the idea.

It actually works out at about a 7ft to 61ft pole.

U.S. wfp USER

  • Posts: 313
Re: The Super-Lite Video
« Reply #45 on: March 11, 2007, 02:24:12 pm »
hypothetically could one go to heights of 70'?
Shawn Gavin
Reach Higher Ground

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7744
Re: The Super-Lite Video
« Reply #46 on: March 11, 2007, 07:48:59 pm »
Hypothetically one could do many things!

Whilst we do not advocate or recommend going higher than 60ft, there are several operators who are using this pole set-up at 70ft+. We can provide extra joint strengthening that help the pole withstand the extra stresses (although some are using it without). Also a Lanyard support system can help minimise the risk of cross winds.

I personally would not want to use any pole at these sort of heights. Although the pole would still be very light (4.3kg at 76ft) there would be issues with controlling the pole in any side winds. A cradle or 'cherry picker' would be another option.

Jeff Brimble

  • Posts: 4347
Re: The Super-Lite Video
« Reply #47 on: March 12, 2007, 01:04:52 pm »
Heres a pic of a "lanyard" attachement, its one part of a safety device I developed  for one person operation, high pole work. I call it a "Sky Hook". Will have to get round to writing a report.

U.S. wfp USER

  • Posts: 313
Re: The Super-Lite Video
« Reply #48 on: March 12, 2007, 01:19:22 pm »
Heres a pic of a "lanyard" attachement, its one part of a safety device I developed  for one person operation, high pole work. I call it a "Sky Hook". Will have to get round to writing a report.


Hey Jeff
How do you use it?
Shawn Gavin
Reach Higher Ground

U.S. wfp USER

  • Posts: 313
Re: The Super-Lite Video
« Reply #49 on: March 12, 2007, 01:20:37 pm »
Hypothetically one could do many things!

Whilst we do not advocate or recommend going higher than 60ft, there are several operators who are using this pole set-up at 70ft+. We can provide extra joint strengthening that help the pole withstand the extra stresses (although some are using it without). Also a Lanyard support system can help minimise the risk of cross winds.

I personally would not want to use any pole at these sort of heights. Although the pole would still be very light (4.3kg at 76ft) there would be issues with controlling the pole in any side winds. A cradle or 'cherry picker' would be another option.

Do you have an up close photo of the joints, gooseneck, or brush?

Thanks.
Shawn Gavin
Reach Higher Ground

Jeff Brimble

  • Posts: 4347
Re: The Super-Lite Video New
« Reply #50 on: March 12, 2007, 09:26:32 pm »
Shawn its almost the eve of our equivalent of a "picnic" or IWCA event www.cleaningshow.co.uk  bit busy nowfor full explanation, applologies.