Clean It Up

UK Floor Cleaning Forum => Carpet Cleaning Forum => Topic started by: stevegunn on September 26, 2007, 08:25:53 pm

Title: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: stevegunn on September 26, 2007, 08:25:53 pm
http://youtube.com/watch?v=GUUokpS2GGo

Benny Hill eat your heart out ;D
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: stuart_clark on September 26, 2007, 08:32:41 pm
Steve, looks like Chemdry have there own version of the RX20
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: *paul_moss on September 26, 2007, 09:16:25 pm
Steve seen this before total bollukkks,no way can a pad system out clean a HWE machine in terms of soil removal.
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 26, 2007, 09:39:56 pm
Many Americans and Canadians would disagree Paul and can back it up

rob m
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: *paul_moss on September 26, 2007, 09:53:30 pm
Rob I know this and had man an argument about it.
I find on moderatey soiled carpets it is ok but on heavy soil or dense piled carpets that hwe far out performs it.
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Len Gribble on September 26, 2007, 10:19:03 pm
Rob

Bit like the shake and vac type systems Vs the bonnet type (looks like a minuteman machine ;))

Len
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Mike Osbourne on September 26, 2007, 10:21:00 pm
Many Americans and Canadians would disagree Paul and can back it up

rob m

Well I only know one Yank carpet cleaner and I'd put money on it that he'd reckon his T/M would wipe the floor with any encap OP system. ;)
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 26, 2007, 10:42:33 pm
Yes I know, but the encap products, the bonnets and the o/p machines have proven themselves to t/m users who were amazed at the results.
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Shaun_Ashmore on September 26, 2007, 10:45:39 pm
Domestically HWE for me commercially both, I can get better results and faster production with a rotary system.

Robert have you still got your Klanz?

Shaun
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 26, 2007, 10:49:59 pm
Regretably not, wish I had, great little machine

rob m
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: lands on September 26, 2007, 11:25:13 pm
No agitation on the HWE demo. Thats the difference
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 26, 2007, 11:29:12 pm
Aggitation is provided by the high pressure from T/M

rob m

invalid excuse
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: lands on September 26, 2007, 11:36:52 pm
I don't get that Rob. How does that work?
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: stuart_clark on September 27, 2007, 09:07:59 am
I noticed on the LM system it was a two man team, so was quicker , but they were cleaning the same carpet and the LM system did seem to get better results
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 27, 2007, 09:19:23 am
Two man team !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Yes another guy sprayed and laid the pad down, but the actual cleaning by the V/L/M system was completed in about a quarter of the time.

However, it's a duff test in terms of the finished result which would have taken longer
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Mike Halliday on September 27, 2007, 12:09:20 pm
lets not forget that with a bonnet all you are doing is rubbing the top surface with a damp cloth, it will wipe off any surface dirt on a man-made fibre. in this video you need to ask which system is taking the most dirt out off the carpet ( not just off the top)

of course you will get more visible soil transfered to a bonnet on the side done by the HWE because you are running a bonnet across a damp carpet so you are taking more soil out of the carpet, on the other side the bonnet is clean because no more dirt an be removed because the carpet is dry, so apart from just abrasion there is no way more dirt can be extracted.

all this video shows is a reason to run a bonnet across a HWE'd carpet to remove more soil

Mike
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: PaulKing on September 27, 2007, 02:39:11 pm
It does look like they use the dirty bonnet from the dry cleaning that is face up at the end of the dry system,  face down on the HWE carpet run over, or do my eyes decive me have a look at 1.20 where the dry guys walk back in and pick up the bonnet. they use a new one on the  dry sytem and the old one on the wet.
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: The Great One on September 27, 2007, 06:07:43 pm
Hi

Hmmm, Shake & Vac system...

I like the sound of that.

Regards

Martin 8)

Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 27, 2007, 06:55:56 pm
Don't think they are using a dirty pad for the wet clean area and clean for the dry area and what shake and vac' has to do with this is beyond me.

Encapsulation is happening in a big way, elsewhere, because,

It gives a good result
Is very quick drying
Is quick to set up und use
Is very quiet in operation
Is very quick in use
Is more profitable.

The products are superior to the old shampoos, which left a residue. Modern crystallising dry foams don't leave a sticky residue and some have a built in inhibitor.

Anyone who has used the Cimex would appreciate the fantastic productivety of the machine and from all accounts, the genuine pro versions of o/p machines are winning over, even the more cynical of t/m'ers.

rob m

Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Mike Halliday on September 27, 2007, 07:01:53 pm
what has  encapsulation got to do with this?  it looks like an advert for a bonnet chemical, if it also encapsulates then great but this isn't evident from the vidio

Mike
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Mike Osbourne on September 27, 2007, 09:10:01 pm
To be slightly cynical about it. Surely it is ideal for the commercial job where the guy just wants the lowest price for it to look ok.

You can educate them till the cows come home but they ain't interested in deep clean.

Common sense say HWE is bound to be better but so what if the custie wants it give it too him, just don't pretend it's better.

Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: The Great One on September 27, 2007, 09:56:53 pm
Hi

Common sense doesn't say it, the HWE companies say it and so people believe it.

Saying HWE is the best without even trying Encap is just like saying God exists! because that it what you have been taught. You don't know 100 % for certain.

Where is the irrefutable proof it does in either case ( HWE & God, or Man-made climate change)

Don't just say it because you have been told it, examine why it is and offer proof.

Regards

Martin 8)
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Neil Williams on September 27, 2007, 09:57:22 pm
To be slightly cynical about it. Surely it is ideal for the commercial job where the guy just wants the lowest price for it to look ok.
You can educate them till the cows come home but they ain't interested in deep clean.
Common sense say HWE is bound to be better but so what if the custie wants it give it too him, just don't pretend it's better.

As someone who carries HWE, Texatherm and the wonder (!) charlie pad system, my prefered method for quality work is
1. HWE
2. Cotton pad sytem
3. Charlie Pads

The demo at the CCDO just about summed it up.
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: lands on September 27, 2007, 10:06:46 pm
I agree with Neil. Don't carry all but even Doug H will tell you that HWE (if done properly, beats all else) it's a simple combination of chemistry and physics.
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Shaun_Ashmore on September 27, 2007, 10:41:02 pm
I'm mainly HWE but I can't agree that HWE will suit all carpets, I can sometimes get better results with a LM system, but if I couple them both together I get the best system but they have to pay for it.

Shaun
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 27, 2007, 10:51:30 pm
The encap comment was in response to the " wiping with a cloth " comment, to entighten some who know nothing of encapsulation or oscillating pad technology.

I'm aware that some experimenting has taken place and as always some will be in favour, others will not, that's life.

All I'm saying is encapsulation is more advanced in America and Canada than here and there is a lively debate in which t/m users have gone over to encap, after experiencing it with an experienced individual.

I have been playing around with it and have had some very good results on a variety of carpet types and that is with a lightweight machine.

Its got a lot in it's favour and from a commercial point of view makes a lot of sense. By that I mean it is capable of making carpet cleaners a lot of money for less effort and lower capital cost.

Is that not why you are in business, or do you prefer to work harder and kid yourself that you are doing a better job than everyone else.

Running a business, is about making money..............end of story !

rob m
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Shaun_Ashmore on September 27, 2007, 10:55:39 pm
No Robert you are supposed to say PERIOD.

I can remember reading on the ICS board that some cleaners about 5 years ago were making $150 an hour because of its production.

The thing that puts most off is that if they do the same old cleaning they are guaranteed the same results and results are what count or you don't get paid PERIOD! ;D

Shaun
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Neil Williams on September 27, 2007, 11:05:36 pm
Surely this all depends on what you are selling, are you selling appearence or are you selling clean?
To the customer the look is the same but there is no way a rotary is going to deep clean as much as HWE. Play with stats, video clips all you want, HWE is the full clean,but for ease of making money whilst the customer is happy at the end I prefere using rotary methods.
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 28, 2007, 12:16:29 am
Touche'

There is so much written on boards about the DEEPEST, MOST THOROUGH, ETC, but the reality of being in business, is, judged by what you actually deposit in the bank and your back pocket.

What really matters, is what method is the most profitable, because it's profit that drives business, any business.

If you are desperately anxious about saving the planet, don't be a cleaner. Go and join Greenpeace !

If you are serious about making money, consider the most productive methods, ie, how you will get the most money for time and effort spent, period !!!

Bit of a departure from my usual rants, but it's all about stimulating the grey matter. The posts tend to be about machines or chemicals, which is fine, but there's only one reason to be doing what you're doing.

rob m
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Mike Osbourne on September 28, 2007, 12:34:10 am
So now you are actually admitting it's not as good as HWE just good enough to make you more money?
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpet guy on September 28, 2007, 07:00:55 am
Where did you read those words ??????????????????????

I was, in the last post stating the correct approach, from a business point of view, that being, the reason for being in business, is to make money, to make the maximium amount of money for time, effort, capital cost, spent, is to utilise the most cost effective productive tools, methods, technology, available, there being no place in business, for complacency, or stubbornness, or closed mind mentality.

That post was not comparing, or endorsing a method.

I have expressed myself on that previously and it just occurred to me when reading the posts, that most time on forums is spent on discussing, particular products and theorising as to their capabilities.

This reminded me of the basic concept of running a business, which is.............

To get the maximum return from your investment, by getting the maximum productivity / profit  from the methods / equipment available. Basic stuff, really, but sometimes being forgotten when discussing individual preferences.

Remember, the only line that counts in any business, is the bottom line.

have a nice day, I'm off to pack my case for two weeks in the Domminican Republic my kids just got back from cruising around there a couple of days ago



 
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Mike Osbourne on September 28, 2007, 08:51:10 am
 Rob: 'Yes I know, but the encap products, the bonnets and the o/p machines have proven themselves to t/m users who were amazed at the results.'

This was your response to an earlier post by paul moss and one from me. To me at least, this means you think the results from encap are of an equivelent standard to HWE.

Enjoy your hols. ;)

Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Matt Read on September 28, 2007, 04:39:53 pm
You also have to remember not all customers are ignorant, i'm not big into bonnet cleaning but have used it to good effect .I prefer to use it when its a vacant property unless the customer has asked for l m cleaning.

I'm sure that there are carpets i could use it on in a domestic situation but i find my customers feel short changed if they can't hear the truckmount running and see the dirt being sucked up the vaccum hose. A lot actually ask for it now (save me a parking space etc) and most of these i serviced with my portable in the past,if i took a rotary in i don't think they would feel the same at the end of the clean regardless of the result.

I'm positive that referrals are easier to get when you use hwe,thats my experience anyway. I'm finding customers are wising up in my area and have been asking me a lot more questions over the last two years than they did in the previous ten .

I don't think business growth would be as quick with encap cleaning so maybe that outweighs the savings you can make on  l m cleaning.
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Shaun_Ashmore on September 28, 2007, 05:08:10 pm
If like me you have bought a TM for increased productivity then encap cleaning would do the same for commercial work as it's faster than TMing but the reservations are will it do the job?

Because we don't know we don't do it!

Shaun
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: gwrightson on September 28, 2007, 05:16:23 pm
strange opinion Matt,
I have been using cimex encap for a number of weeks now, giving the customer a choice and explainng the differences, low profile, and commercial I do push the encap, getting some good results.
I cleaned a retirment apartment in a community building last week, picked up 5 custy same building. Why ? I gave a demo in the communual lounge area whilst I was there, they liked the fact of the speed and drying time. by the time I had a coffee with them it was dry. as for hearing a t/m running !!!! I thought all the t/m,s wanted as little noise as poss :)   ;) I can see your point though, attraction, people are curious to whats going on also when they hear a noise, having said that a big selling point regarding encap in a working envoirment , you can clean whilst people are still working very low noise, very fast drying , and no hazardous pipes , lines etc.

I have got my eye on a t/m though ;D
Geoff
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: gwrightson on September 28, 2007, 05:19:46 pm
Shaun why dont we Know?
Have you tried it on commercial?
pop down to Hull and spend a morning with it and let me know what you think :), or if you want Ill pop up to sunny sheffield and give it a go , when you have some commercial work in.

Geoff
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Shaun_Ashmore on September 28, 2007, 05:48:37 pm
I used to use a Cimex nearly 20 years ago infact I know the owner and designers son but when I used it 50% of the carpets needed HWE after BUT the chemistry has changed now.

Shaun
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Matt Read on September 28, 2007, 06:36:47 pm
You're right shaun, i don't think i believe in it or am experienced enough with l m cleaning to push it and prob sound a bit negative when explaining the differences to customers.

I think it's great for the commercial sector , as you say geoff,low costs and minimal hassle ,i'm looking to use it more if i can. i'm just not 100 % in my choosing the right carpets and amount of soiling to use it.

What are the long term effects of maintenance  pad cleaning ? do you have to do a hwe clean once in a while to deep clean ?
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: gwrightson on September 28, 2007, 06:44:33 pm
Matt,
forgive me if I am wrong, but I am not sure if you are confusing some of the methods :-\
Encap and bonnet are differnent and the chems and machines are completly different, I was of the same opinion as you not really knowing the differences and benifits of the two, untill introduced by a well known and respected c/c on here.
Its not that difficult, just important to stress post vaccuming.


http://leonardo.solid8.com/webapp/solid8/servlet/SolDisplayNew?purpose=pagedisplay&username=truvox2&username2=1731931938&catid=1056&edition=176


take a look here

geoff

Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: stevegunn on September 28, 2007, 07:01:08 pm
How much is the encap system?

Can you not just use an ordinary rotary with brush and encap chemical?
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: JS2 on September 28, 2007, 07:02:28 pm
Colleagues

I've only ever, and still, use HWE (although I'm not a regular day-in / day-out cleaner like most of you).  Come, or fear, the glorious day when a predictable LM / VLM system that suits virtually all situations enters the scene !!  However I did try to encourage some comments the other week regarding LM practice with the HWE method, but no replies :(  I've often got 80/20 carpets dry in less than 1 hr with an Extracta DX and a good deal of sweat.  Perhaps relies to my earlier posting might invite some comments as a tie breaker ?

Regards

Pete (JS2)
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: Mike Halliday on September 28, 2007, 07:15:05 pm
Encapsulation refers to a chemical rather than a particular machine, although it is generally used with the Cimex, in the USA they use the Cimex, the Sprint ( like a Rotawash )and an Oscillating Pad Machine.

so you could encap with a bonnet machine

Mike

Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: PaulKing on September 28, 2007, 08:40:55 pm
got a encap sytem the YORKSTER 5000 and it's good but just HWE'd 400 Sq meters today because it needed to be right frist time.

 re watch that video they use the dirty pad face down on the hwe bit it's slight of hand and it happens at 1.22 as they walk back in
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: capital-services on September 29, 2007, 05:15:19 pm
PAUL,
Did you not notice that he chucks the dirty pad to the side then splits the two he has in his hand.

Dennis
Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: *paul_moss on September 30, 2007, 06:54:19 pm
JS2
Im truckmounted and before that used many portabl machines,I have never been able to get a 80/20  carpet dry in under an hour and unless your using something like 10 psi it is not possible.

 A wool carpet if cleaned correctly will take hours to dry.

Stuart
I have used Rotobrite 2 with a heated rotary and find it billiant on low priile comercial carpets.



Title: Re: HWE vs. EncapSOLUTION
Post by: carpetworx on October 01, 2007, 10:36:37 am
paul
i use a porty and a rdm, carpets dry in around 40mins.