Clean It Up

UK Floor Cleaning Forum => Carpet Cleaning Forum => Topic started by: garyfindlay on June 17, 2007, 10:58:50 am

Title: microsplitters v bonnet chemicals
Post by: garyfindlay on June 17, 2007, 10:58:50 am

when bonnet cleaning mainly low profile carpet tiles, would m power etc give a quicker, better clean than the bonnet chemicals that are on offer?

Title: Re: microsplitters v bonnet chemicals
Post by: *paul_moss on June 17, 2007, 09:29:07 pm

Gary its each to there own with chemical preference as you will find 10 different carpet cleaners will use 10 different chemicals for the same type of job.
My preference on this type of L/M bonnet would be one step premium M/S.

Title: Re: microsplitters v bonnet chemicals
Post by: lee_gundry on June 17, 2007, 10:14:52 pm

i have been doing loads of low p office carpet areas & getting very good results with pc pure clean ,used in prespray & wringer


Lee G

Title: Re: microsplitters v bonnet chemicals
Post by: covenant on June 18, 2007, 09:49:35 am

I really like advance cleaner from TCS

Title: Re: microsplitters v bonnet chemicals
Post by: Dust Knights on June 18, 2007, 10:19:58 am

I find that M Power gives great results on wool carpets but not so good on synthetic fibres. Therefore I'd use No.9 from Solution or Microsplit from Craftex.

Chris

Title: Re: microsplitters v bonnet chemicals
Post by: Ken Wainwright on June 18, 2007, 12:25:15 pm

I wouldn't have a problem using a product with elevated pH such as Solution UK's No9 on heavily soiled polypropylene. However, many modern carpet tiles as used in the office environment use nylon fibres that have dye systems, as well as the fibres structure, that may be damaged by high alkalinity and elevated pH.  I would therefore, as a general rule, advise using solutions that fall into the neutral pH range.

Safe and happy cleaning :)
Ken