Clean It Up

UK Window Cleaning Forum => Window Cleaning Forum => Topic started by: johnny bravo on January 05, 2015, 12:40:06 pm

Title: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: johnny bravo on January 05, 2015, 12:40:06 pm
Alex can you let me know if i can add another section to my clx 27,      i have added a section 7 onto it atm for higher jobs,
Can you let me know if you have a section 8,      i have a job to quote      but i am around 3 feet short on the pole to reach top sections.
thanks.

cant quote unless i can add extra lengh.     i will have to leave.
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: Alex Gardiner on January 05, 2015, 01:33:00 pm
Alex can you let me know if i can add another section to my clx 27,      i have added a section 7 onto it atm for higher jobs,
Can you let me know if you have a section 8,      i have a job to quote      but i am around 3 feet short on the pole to reach top sections.
thanks.

cant quote unless i can add extra lengh.     i will have to leave.

Hi Johnny

Whilst it would not be the best for the job at this height it can be done. You can add an SLX Extension Section #8 on which will give you about an extra 4.5ft (£72+VAT).

I would love to give you a website link for this item, but we have had some website database issues over the weekend and this is why the new website and order software systems are not back online as they were due to be. It will probably be midday tomorrow now.
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: johnny bravo on January 05, 2015, 02:13:26 pm
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: johnny bravo on January 05, 2015, 02:16:33 pm
have you added these extentions onto a clx27 to see what the problems might occur if i did this

thanks 4 your help so quickly,   if it may cause me problems ill not quote.
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: Alex Gardiner on January 05, 2015, 02:41:33 pm
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

It is only because the pole at 36ft would not be the most rigid option to work with. Technically there would be no issues at all if you are OK with the flex.
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: tlwcs on January 05, 2015, 02:54:42 pm
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

It is only because the pole at 36ft would not be the most rigid option to work with. Technically there would be no issues at all if you are OK with the flex.

Alex, how scary is it to have no orders coming in, sorry to o/p  ;D ;D
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: johnny bravo on January 05, 2015, 02:55:39 pm
so how big is the pole clx27    with the section 7 added.
sorry for all questions but i just want to make sure its worth getting section 8

thanks
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: johnny bravo on January 05, 2015, 02:56:53 pm
ill give a quote tomorrow,    if i get it ill order the section 8,
have you these in stock
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: Alex Gardiner on January 05, 2015, 03:50:11 pm
so how big is the pole clx27    with the section 7 added.
sorry for all questions but i just want to make sure its worth getting section 8

thanks

The CLX27 with Section#7 fitted is about 31ft. With a section #8 fitted as well this would be about 35.5ft
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: Alex Gardiner on January 05, 2015, 03:58:18 pm
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

It is only because the pole at 36ft would not be the most rigid option to work with. Technically there would be no issues at all if you are OK with the flex.

Alex, how scary is it to have no orders coming in, sorry to o/p  ;D ;D

Not too bad as I am so busy I do not have time to think about it right now  :)
Title: Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
Post by: PoleKing on January 05, 2015, 07:53:54 pm
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

It is only because the pole at 36ft would not be the most rigid option to work with. Technically there would be no issues at all if you are OK with the flex.

Alex, how scary is it to have no orders coming in, sorry to o/p  ;D ;D

Not too bad as I am so busy I do not have time to think about it right now  :)

And probably everyone who wants kit will just've waited so tomorrow will turnover c.£1m. ;D