Clean It Up

UK Window Cleaning Forum => Window Cleaning Forum => Topic started by: lippy on April 13, 2006, 10:23:26 pm

Title: time
Post by: lippy on April 13, 2006, 10:23:26 pm
is a wfp clean that much faster than TRAD ??? ???
Title: Re: time
Post by: callum macleod on April 13, 2006, 10:28:00 pm
hi yes by far in most situations. sometimes it is quicker just blade it  ;D
Title: Re: time
Post by: bazzup on April 13, 2006, 10:33:31 pm
speed generates with time ,same as starting again
Title: Re: time
Post by: Morph on April 13, 2006, 10:40:14 pm
wha...............?
Title: Re: time
Post by: Sir Squeaky on April 13, 2006, 10:45:29 pm
Depends how fast you are with a squeegee.

In my case no, wfp isn't quicker.....unless it's georgian windows. :-\
Title: Re: time
Post by: Morph on April 13, 2006, 10:47:06 pm
Hi Rog,

How the Billy Shears are you old boy?
Title: Re: time
Post by: Easyclean Windows on April 13, 2006, 10:49:00 pm
WFp is quicker to clean on most but not all jobs.But if your going to invest in wfp equipment you wont need to squeege as you wont have many small jobs to do just the big ones.I dont do any squeegee work only insides and no ladder work at all
Title: Re: time
Post by: DASERVICES on April 13, 2006, 10:49:23 pm
  It's faster for me , from 5 days to 2.5  ;D ;D

  Squeaky,

  You must hold the Guiness Book Of Records for going up and down a ladder
  then  ;)
Title: Re: time
Post by: Morph on April 13, 2006, 10:51:11 pm
Depends how fast you are with a squeegee.

In my case no, wfp isn't quicker.....unless it's georgian windows. :-\

How are you on Elizabethan?

Let's face it, Victorian and Edwardian can be a challenge.

What would the Victorians have done?
Title: Re: time
Post by: H h20 on April 13, 2006, 10:51:52 pm
Rog can`t give a true opinion on this he does`nt and has never used a wfp,Gaz
Title: Re: time
Post by: Sir Squeaky on April 13, 2006, 11:07:45 pm
Rog can`t give a true opinion on this he does`nt and has never used a wfp,Gaz
Yeah, but I've raced plenty of them and haven't lost yet. ;)
Don't need to try it. I couldn't do it faster than them, there's only so quick you can wfp properly.

Hi Rog,

How the Billy Shears are you old boy?
Hi Pj. :)
You're the first person to notice me for a few days.
I've been posting various funnies, but I seem to have been invisible..... :-\
Title: Re: time
Post by: Morph on April 13, 2006, 11:17:44 pm
Hey Rog,

I had a customer yesterday, just got back from 2 weeks in Oman, middle east!
Brown as a conker!  She opens the door, says to me, " Do it the old way, will you?"
So I proceeded to do it trad,,,,,,,
This one was exactly the same in time!
Hey, I enjoyed doing it!
Same money.
 ;)
Title: Re: time
Post by: macc on April 14, 2006, 06:52:38 pm
Rog can`t give a true opinion on this he does`nt and has never used a wfp,Gaz
Yeah, but I've raced plenty of them and haven't lost yet. ;)
Don't need to try it. I couldn't do it faster than them, there's only so quick you can wfp properly.

Hi Rog,

How the Billy Shears are you old boy?
Hi Pj. :)
You're the first person to notice me for a few days.
I've been posting various funnies, but I seem to have been invisible..... :-\

Depends how fast you are with a squeegee.

In my case no, wfp isn't quicker.....unless it's georgian windows. :-\
???

runs, smears, but im faster.  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: time
Post by: Archy136 on April 14, 2006, 07:06:16 pm
WFP faster by miles. Squeaky, Are you getting paid to to be the devils advocate. we'd have nobody to argue with if you weren't around.
Title: Re: time
Post by: Sir Squeaky on April 14, 2006, 08:15:11 pm
WFP faster by miles. Squeaky, Are you getting paid to to be the devils advocate. we'd have nobody to argue with if you weren't around.
I'm sure Terry "turbo" Burrows would back me up. ;)
You're just slow squeegee'ers (if that's how you spell it!)
Title: Re: time
Post by: Londoner on April 16, 2006, 08:48:03 am
WFP is definitely quicker on the cleaning but slower unloading,setting up then having to pack it up and get it all loaded again afterwards.

This is one of the reasons why you will probably look to change the type of customers you are serving once you get up to speed with WFP.

If you are using a van mounted system you have to be able to park outside. This would eliminate a lot of customers round here straight away. Also a lot of time gets wasted driving round trying to park.

So it horses for courses, with the right customers you can make more money in less time.
Title: Re: time
Post by: Tim Morton on April 16, 2006, 03:14:04 pm
I've been using wfp for 6weeks now and I have found that on houses with wooden framed windows I am as quick as Trad, but with pvc framed windows it takes a bit longer, but i guess that is because its the 1st time with wfp and the frames were pretty dirty.
With commercial work I've found it a lot quicker. I did one block of offices last week, used to take me 3-3.5 hrs to do the outsides, took me just under 2hrs with wfp.
I find unloading and loading up about as long as lugging the ladders on and off the roof rack.

Tim
Title: Re: time
Post by: bumper on April 17, 2006, 07:25:07 am
well wfp would be no good for  me as ive a lot of garages to climb over and gates locked.
Title: Re: time
Post by: Londoner on April 17, 2006, 09:53:47 am
Thats exactly the sort of thing I mean, its horses for courses.
Title: Re: time
Post by: sunshine windows on April 17, 2006, 09:58:04 am
I would imagine if and when i turn WFP i will probably double my speed once i've got the hang of it. Quite slow trad cleaning but i do clean everything

Sunshine
Title: Re: time
Post by: windows_chepstow on April 17, 2006, 04:35:20 pm
well wfp would be no good for  me as ive a lot of garages to climb over and gates locked.

I've quite a few streets like that, so I use the WFP to clean the easy access areas, then return to use ladders.

It still works out easier, safer and less effort involved.