Clean It Up
UK Window Cleaning Forum => Window Cleaning Forum => Topic started by: Fin Clearview on September 14, 2013, 06:43:29 pm
-
Looking to upgrade my 300 RO to something that can produce 600L in less than 12hours! Also I'd like to reduce my waste as been on the dreaded meter for a year and spent £1500 on that alone. Cheers
-
Get a 4040 with booster pump 1000L
In 2 hours adjust waste to suit you and tds
-
Don't you get an abatement on the waste?
-
Don't you get an abatement on the waste?
? I'm after low waste to save on amount used.
-
Get a 4040 with booster pump 1000L
In 2 hours adjust waste to suit you and tds
Thanks Colin, can you explain this a bit more cheers, I've never used a 40" and only been told a little about back washing etc
-
If you are on a meter you get charged for the amount of water used and a sewerage charge, if you fit a sub meter and tell the water company what you are doing you will only get charged for the water not the sewerage charge, when I get my bill I take a reading of my sub meter, phone up anglian water and tell them this reading, they then re issue an amended bill usually over a £100 less.
-
Thanks Luke let me explain.. i recieve the discount from the water board but i want to buy a RO that produces low waste. Low waste = less consumption obviously.
-
Ah I see, well my 4040 is set at 2 litres a minute pure to 2.4 litres waste and thats going in at 450ish ppm and coming out at 12ppm I could adjust it by lowering the waste which would give me more pure but it will up the tds to much and will cost more in resin.
-
Ok cheers, I didn't know that you can set the flow rate on the 40, do you also have 3 pre filters on these as normal on a smaller ro like I have. Also how do you go about back washing? Cheers
-
Ok cheers, I didn't know that you can set the flow rate on the 40, do you also have 3 pre filters on these as normal on a smaller ro like I have. Also how do you go about back washing? Cheers
You cannot set the flow rate, rather you tweak the valve on the waste pipe to adjust your waste/pure ratio.
For hard water areas a 70% waste to 30% pure ratio seems to be the recommended norm.
In a softer water area a 50/50 ratio is probably ok.
Back washing or flushing is easy, you just leave the waste valve fully open so all flushed through water washes over the membrane and goes to drain.
Most 4040 RO's have 2 pre-filters (sediment and carbon block) although some systems are now using just one of the new fibredyne pre-filters.
-
If there was a low waste RO we would all own one.Waste water is what saves RO membrane, any attempt to reduce will kill the live span of your Membrane. So decide which costs more water or membrane. Reducing the waste could also reduce water production gal/min so its catch 22. Any advice would be subjective.
-
Right, i stand corrected. I didnt know the theory about the membrane and waste, i just thought you could get the lowest possible, saying that i do know that an RO works at optimum with higher pressure so i suppose there was my answer. Also do you have to add salt to do the back wash , and what is the benefit of having the new fibredyne pre filter.
-
You only need to backflush a water softener with salt which would be before the ro, you only really need one if your water is very hard like mine. Never put salt through a membrane it wouldn't do it any good.
-
Last time i checked my water was around 250 - still think i need the softener and whats the fibredyne about?
edit. just read up on gardiners but is it the real deal?
-
Looking to upgrade my 300 RO to something that can produce 600L in less than 12hours! Also I'd like to reduce my waste as been on the dreaded meter for a year and spent £1500 on that alone. Cheers
You need a twin 40 40 set up run in "series" (one after the other) as opposed to in "parallell" (side by side). You'll also need a booster pump. Using this expensive set up, i'd guess nearly a grand new , your ratio of waste to pure should read 25% waste, 75% pure.
-
guys if you fit a sub meter do they not try and put you on a business tarriff..?
Graham
-
@ Cleanclear - ok cheers so what you're saying is that low waste isn't possible with one 4040. In that case I think due to the expense I'll go for just the one!
Graham, I'm not registered as a business, they asked but no change to my private residential rate.
-
@ Cleanclear - ok cheers so what you're saying is that low waste isn't possible with one 4040. In that case I think due to the expense I'll go for just the one!
Graham, I'm not registered as a business, they asked but no change to my private residential rate.
As Andy says above you could hope for a waste ratio of 50% with one RO, but also you'd need to flush too, so that would be it all going to waste when you flush. I think thats as good as you can get.
-
So which is the best and cheapest to buy,I'm looking for one
That I can plug in and use,who is the best supplier?
-
Are the prf ones anygood.
Good flow by the sounds of it.nice price and says it produces 75% less waste water.
-
The bottom of this page may be of interest to you !
http://www.gapswater.co.uk/acatalog/copy_of_copy_of_Membranes_used_in_window_cleaning_water_fed_pole_systems-1.html
Rob
-
Are the prf ones anygood.
Good flow by the sounds of it.nice price and says it produces 75% less waste water.
Sorry mate but what does prf mean?
^ Cheers Rob - gaps say 70%waste to 30% pure is the correct ratio, Jesus I think I'll go back on the tools!!
-
which ones are most of you using hf4 or 5
-
I'm thinking of going for the 5 as I have about 50psi.
-
http://www.gapswater.co.uk/acatalog/GE_Merlin_reverse_osmosis_system.html
Heres the one says 75% less waste
-
Is that all you would need,plus tank and di vessel?
-
http://www.gapswater.co.uk/acatalog/GE_Merlin_reverse_osmosis_system.html
Heres the one says 75% less waste
Interesting...Surely these havent been around long, everybody seems to own a hf4/5. I called gaps today and they reccomended the starter kit hf5 with fibre dyne.
-
Its a catch 22 two membranes and the cost of running second will save 25% maybe and save water at what worth as the second one will cost you the same if not more that the water you would possibly save. ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???