Clean It Up

UK Window Cleaning Forum => Window Cleaning Forum => Topic started by: Ian101 on February 27, 2012, 06:28:51 pm

Title: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Ian101 on February 27, 2012, 06:28:51 pm
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Briar+Drive,+Buckley&hl=en&ll=53.163858,-3.062997&spn=0.000026,0.020921&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=12.896204,42.84668&oq=briar+drive+bu&hnear=Briar+Dr,+Buckley,+Flintshire+CH7+2,+United+Kingdom&t=m&z=16&layer=c&cbll=53.16374,-3.071127&panoid=YZWJaOFlWGRW3qt9XOp5vQ&cbp=12,90,,0,0

Hi Richard ... noticed on another post that your work method is under scrutiny again.

Thought it may be interesting to see what you do different to me and prob most on here  :)

Now then I cleaned a house today identical to the one in the googlemap link above. ... (house on right)

No access issues.

My way of working

Out of van
Open rear doors
Remove hose reel
Connect pole hose to hosereel
Pull hose out
Do Rears
Do Sides (only 1 side as semi)
Do Fronts
Pack pole away
Reel hose back in
Hose reel in back of van
Write Envelope
Put through letterbox
Drive off

3 windows on front
1 front door
2 side windows
4 rear windows
1 rear door

Start to finish 13.5 minutes .... which I rekon is about the average ??

How long would it have taken you and can you tell the forum what you do differently ?
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Perfect Windows on February 27, 2012, 06:36:35 pm
Stuff it, made a serious post, but someone (predictably) has to take the p i s s , so I've deleted it.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: matthewprice on February 27, 2012, 06:38:49 pm
get an electric reel saves 30 sec per house i am told ;D
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Carl@Cwc on February 27, 2012, 06:44:33 pm
how much is that 3 bedder up there ian ?
you can mail me if you prefer
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: alanwilson on February 27, 2012, 06:44:55 pm
Yeah it's the little things that add up, connecting pole to hose, why not leave it connected?

Also try your flow rate at max, much much quicker.

We do a run of semis nearly identical and we average 7 per hour per man.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Ian101 on February 27, 2012, 06:47:19 pm
how much is that 3 bedder up there ian ?
you can mail me if you prefer

£10 for like 1 in link
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Ian101 on February 27, 2012, 06:48:47 pm
Stuff it, made a serious post, but someone (predictably) has to take the p i s s , so I've deleted it.

I read it and took onboard what you were saying ... thanks !  ;)
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: alanwilson on February 27, 2012, 06:49:05 pm
£8 for us.

Only have about 150 of this size
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Carl@Cwc on February 27, 2012, 06:50:01 pm
nice price for a 3 bedder. :o

thats 90p per item.
wish i could get them prices.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Ian101 on February 27, 2012, 06:50:17 pm
Yeah it's the little things that add up, connecting pole to hose, why not leave it connected?

Also try your flow rate at max, much much quicker.

We do a run of semis nearly identical and we average 7 per hour per man.

no room on reel at too full of microbore but can soon loose some .. another good point
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Carl@Cwc on February 27, 2012, 06:51:25 pm
£8 for us.

Only have about 150 of this size

£8 for us too.

i leave pole attached and leave hosereel in back door.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Ian101 on February 27, 2012, 06:51:40 pm
£8 for us.

Only have about 150 of this size

some lads do em for £6 to £8 but not me
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: SunShineCleaning on February 27, 2012, 07:42:21 pm
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Briar+Drive,+Buckley&hl=en&ll=53.163858,-3.062997&spn=0.000026,0.020921&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=12.896204,42.84668&oq=briar+drive+bu&hnear=Briar+Dr,+Buckley,+Flintshire+CH7+2,+United+Kingdom&t=m&z=16&layer=c&cbll=53.16374,-3.071127&panoid=YZWJaOFlWGRW3qt9XOp5vQ&cbp=12,90,,0,0

Hi Richard ... noticed on another post that your work method is under scrutiny again.

Thought it may be interesting to see what you do different to me and prob most on here  :)

Now then I cleaned a house today identical to the one in the googlemap link above. ... (house on right)

No access issues.

My way of working

Out of van
Open rear doors
Remove hose reel
Connect pole hose to hosereel
Pull hose out
Do Rears
Do Sides (only 1 side as semi)
Do Fronts
Pack pole away
Reel hose back in
Hose reel in back of van
Write Envelope
Put through letterbox
Drive off

3 windows on front
1 front door
2 side windows
4 rear windows
1 rear door

Start to finish 13.5 minutes .... which I rekon is about the average ??

How long would it have taken you and can you tell the forum what you do differently ?

I pre write the bills and post as I'm cleaning rather than go back.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: AuRavelling79 on February 27, 2012, 07:44:20 pm


My way of working

Out of van
Open rear doors (or side door if better) and put cone out
Hose reel screwed down Pole hose stays connected to hosereel Pull hose out
Tap door on way to do rearsDo Rears
Do Sides (only 1 side as semi)
(If not in write out ticket at this point and post)
Do Fronts
Pack pole away
Reel hose back in
Put cone back in
Update worksheet
Drive off

3 windows on front
1 front door
2 side windows
4 rear windows
1 rear door

Start to finish 13.5 minutes .... which I rekon is about the average ??

How long would it have taken you and can you tell the forum what you do differently ?
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 27, 2012, 07:48:47 pm
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Briar+Drive,+Buckley&hl=en&ll=53.163858,-3.062997&spn=0.000026,0.020921&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=12.896204,42.84668&oq=briar+drive+bu&hnear=Briar+Dr,+Buckley,+Flintshire+CH7+2,+United+Kingdom&t=m&z=16&layer=c&cbll=53.16374,-3.071127&panoid=YZWJaOFlWGRW3qt9XOp5vQ&cbp=12,90,,0,0

Hi Richard ... noticed on another post that your work method is under scrutiny again.

Thought it may be interesting to see what you do different to me and prob most on here  :)

Now then I cleaned a house today identical to the one in the googlemap link above. ... (house on right)

No access issues.

My way of working

Out of van
Open rear doors
Remove hose reel
Connect pole hose to hosereel
Pull hose out
Do Rears
Do Sides (only 1 side as semi)
Do Fronts
Pack pole away
Reel hose back in
Hose reel in back of van
Write Envelope
Put through letterbox
Drive off

3 windows on front
1 front door
2 side windows
4 rear windows
1 rear door

Start to finish 13.5 minutes .... which I rekon is about the average ??

How long would it have taken you and can you tell the forum what you do differently ?
[/quote

hey ian!

Not a lot different really.  Main thing is that the hose reel is attached to the van..


van stops, driver jumps out opens doors, grabs hose and unwinds straight to back gate.  if open he leads hose all way round to back and waits for WC.  
if locked he leads hose to start point at front of house and waits for WC.

WC gets out van, puts on belt, grabs pole and walks fast to wheredriver is waiting.  driver plugs in hose.  WC starts to clean.

if gate locked driver then rings bell top access back,  if no answer starts to see if can unlock gate.

once gate open driver sets hose out around the house and then fills in card for client and posts.

once card posted driver back to WC and helps him move around the house so hose not caught.

WC finishes cleaning, driver helps him get back to van, WC reals in hose whilst driver jumps in van, sets sat nav, and when ready leaves.

if cleaning a neighbour driver will lay out hose around next house, and check gate etc whilst WC cleaning.

this type of house will take us 8 min
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 27, 2012, 07:50:52 pm
all the above is done with a sense of real urgency and both workers moving fast all the time
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: AuRavelling79 on February 27, 2012, 07:51:45 pm
10 - 15 mins depending if I'm in the groove or not.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: richywilts on February 27, 2012, 09:08:30 pm
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Briar+Drive,+Buckley&hl=en&ll=53.163858,-3.062997&spn=0.000026,0.020921&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=12.896204,42.84668&oq=briar+drive+bu&hnear=Briar+Dr,+Buckley,+Flintshire+CH7+2,+United+Kingdom&t=m&z=16&layer=c&cbll=53.16374,-3.071127&panoid=YZWJaOFlWGRW3qt9XOp5vQ&cbp=12,90,,0,0

Hi Richard ... noticed on another post that your work method is under scrutiny again.

Thought it may be interesting to see what you do different to me and prob most on here  :)

Now then I cleaned a house today identical to the one in the googlemap link above. ... (house on right)

No access issues.

My way of working

Out of van
Open rear doors
Remove hose reel
Connect pole hose to hosereel
Pull hose out
Do Rears
Do Sides (only 1 side as semi)
Do Fronts
Pack pole away
Reel hose back in
Hose reel in back of van
Write Envelope
Put through letterbox
Drive off

3 windows on front
1 front door
2 side windows
4 rear windows
1 rear door

Start to finish 13.5 minutes .... which I rekon is about the average ??

How long would it have taken you and can you tell the forum what you do differently ?
[/quote

hey ian!

Not a lot different really.  Main thing is that the hose reel is attached to the van..


van stops, driver jumps out opens doors, grabs hose and unwinds straight to back gate.  if open he leads hose all way round to back and waits for WC.  
if locked he leads hose to start point at front of house and waits for WC.

WC gets out van, puts on belt, grabs pole and walks fast to wheredriver is waiting.  driver plugs in hose.  WC starts to clean.

if gate locked driver then rings bell top access back,  if no answer starts to see if can unlock gate.

once gate open driver sets hose out around the house and then fills in card for client and posts.

once card posted driver back to WC and helps him move around the house so hose not caught.

WC finishes cleaning, driver helps him get back to van, WC reals in hose whilst driver jumps in van, sets sat nav, and when ready leaves.

if cleaning a neighbour driver will lay out hose around next house, and check gate etc whilst WC cleaning.

this type of house will take us 8 min

i cant see how that justifys paying a wage myself richard for the time you save yourself to clean more houses those extra houses must just about pay the drivers wage
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Carl@Cwc on February 27, 2012, 09:15:09 pm
all the above is done with a sense of real urgency and both workers moving fast all the time

hi m8
aint here to knock you by the way.
so your other operative doesnt clean at all ?
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: stuart mc on February 27, 2012, 09:29:51 pm
agree with richy, plus I could clean that on my own in the time it takes the two guys.

high flow rate

reel stays in van

reel out start working

slips in my pocket so the they can be posted if no one in
 knock the door before starting the front

Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 27, 2012, 10:39:06 pm
all the above is done with a sense of real urgency and both workers moving fast all the time

hi m8
aint here to knock you by the way.
so your other operative doesnt clean at all ?

no the van driver doesn;t clean.  it is the senior position so he will have been the pole operator previously.

we find that we get thru the same amount of work with only one pole operator, and it is a lot easier doing it like this.

like i said on a previous thread, the reason that we do it this way is because we have found it works best.  working like this we
clean 50 or the equivalent houses per day working from 8am and walking out the office after drop off at 4.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: KS Cleaning on February 27, 2012, 10:44:07 pm
all the above is done with a sense of real urgency and both workers moving fast all the time

hi m8
aint here to knock you by the way.
so your other operative doesnt clean at all ?

no the van driver doesn;t clean.  it is the senior position so he will have been the pole operator previously.

we find that we get thru the same amount of work with only one pole operator, and it is a lot easier doing it like this.

like i said on a previous thread, the reason that we do it this way is because we have found it works best.  working like this we
clean 50 or the equivalent houses per day working from 8am and walking out the office after drop off at 4.
I believe this is the way clear view plus(concept 2o)operate.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 27, 2012, 10:49:32 pm
all the above is done with a sense of real urgency and both workers moving fast all the time

hi m8
aint here to knock you by the way.
so your other operative doesnt clean at all ?

no the van driver doesn;t clean.  it is the senior position so he will have been the pole operator previously.

we find that we get thru the same amount of work with only one pole operator, and it is a lot easier doing it like this.

like i said on a previous thread, the reason that we do it this way is because we have found it works best.  working like this we
clean 50 or the equivalent houses per day working from 8am and walking out the office after drop off at 4.
I believe this is the way clear view plus(concept 2o)operate.

it is how they operate.  i;m one of their franchisees  ;D
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Tom White on February 27, 2012, 11:00:16 pm
all the above is done with a sense of real urgency and both workers moving fast all the time

hi m8
aint here to knock you by the way.
so your other operative doesnt clean at all ?

no the van driver doesn;t clean.  it is the senior position so he will have been the pole operator previously.

we find that we get thru the same amount of work with only one pole operator, and it is a lot easier doing it like this.

like i said on a previous thread, the reason that we do it this way is because we have found it works best.  working like this we
clean 50 or the equivalent houses per day working from 8am and walking out the office after drop off at 4.
I believe this is the way clear view plus(concept 2o)operate.

it is how they operate.  i;m one of their franchisees  ;D

Two people working from one van should split up; one hose and pole each; and work on different properties.

Unless your round is really undeveloped and spread out all over the place; then some time should be taken to canvass and try and get
some more compact work.  Also try targeting areas where there aren't gates to negotiate.

I work with Wor Lass and we never operate like the system I've just read.  Two people should both be working; never should one just be
stood around.  It takes some team work and practise, but we certainly wouldn't work like this.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: stuart mc on February 27, 2012, 11:03:35 pm
to be fair I can see that working if it is one house move, one house move etc but it would need to be very well priced
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: richywilts on February 27, 2012, 11:04:41 pm
i dont get it surely it would be much quicker having someone smashing the back of a house with a big conservatory and makin way round to the side than have someone to manouvere a hose around for the junior operator

im not having a go richard just differing opinions
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 27, 2012, 11:08:40 pm
i dont get it surely it would be much quicker having someone smashing the back of a house with a big conservatory and makin way round to the side than have someone to manouvere a hose around for the junior operator

im not having a go richard just differing opinions

its all down to the speed the pole operator is working at.  if the pole operator is moving fast, from window to window, it makes a big difference
having a helper.

if its a first clean, then they dont make a difference at all, so we dont put 2 guys on for these.

and tosh, i agree with you when you say one worker should never be stood around.  the van driver is working just as quickly to keep the pole
operator working so fast.

the only reason we do it like this is because it is the best, and by that i mean fastest and easiest way we've found.

not many hit the number of houses that we do in a day.  there's others on here who do, but not many of them.

Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: richywilts on February 27, 2012, 11:10:30 pm
il have to come n watch tmoz i need convincing haha text me ya number richard to 07894821844
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: KS Cleaning on February 27, 2012, 11:16:00 pm
all the above is done with a sense of real urgency and both workers moving fast all the time

hi m8
aint here to knock you by the way.
so your other operative doesnt clean at all ?

no the van driver doesn;t clean.  it is the senior position so he will have been the pole operator previously.

we find that we get thru the same amount of work with only one pole operator, and it is a lot easier doing it like this.

like i said on a previous thread, the reason that we do it this way is because we have found it works best.  working like this we
clean 50 or the equivalent houses per day working from 8am and walking out the office after drop off at 4.
I believe this is the way clear view plus(concept 2o)operate.

it is how they operate.  i;m one of their franchisees  ;D
Yes I know,I came close to buying an ex demo system off Julie,but in the end decided against it.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Tom White on February 27, 2012, 11:17:54 pm
i dont get it surely it would be much quicker having someone smashing the back of a house with a big conservatory and makin way round to the side than have someone to manouvere a hose around for the junior operator

im not having a go richard just differing opinions

its all down to the speed the pole operator is working at.  if the pole operator is moving fast, from window to window, it makes a big difference
having a helper.

if its a first clean, then they dont make a difference at all, so we dont put 2 guys on for these.

and tosh, i agree with you when you say one worker should never be stood around.  the van driver is working just as quickly to keep the pole
operator working so fast.

the only reason we do it like this is because it is the best, and by that i mean fastest and easiest way we've found.

not many hit the number of houses that we do in a day.  there's others on here who do, but not many of them.



I have two days of 'drive betweens' and I just save them for when Wor Lass has a day off and I do these myself.  I think two people is an overkill for
small drive between jobs.  I'll canvass around mine in the Spring.

But for compact work, we always split up.  I can think of numerous properties - domestic - where I've got a lot of glass to do and my hose doesn't really
need moving.  Or I also have a trick of tying the van hose around my body like a ammunition bandoleer (think Mexican gun slinger) and the hose goes where
I walk; this works really well where I've a lot of glass and not many obstacles for the hose to get wrapped up around.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: stuart mc on February 27, 2012, 11:19:01 pm
are you for real richard 50 houses a day between two men is and must be easily achievable, I would expect two trad guys to do that easily in a day working 8 am till 4, never mind wfp

I must add this is based on the type of house on the posters link
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 27, 2012, 11:47:01 pm
are you for real richard 50 houses a day between two men is and must be easily achievable, I would expect two trad guys to do that easily in a day working 8 am till 4, never mind wfp

I must add this is based on the type of house on the posters link

hey stuart,

i know it's easily achievable day in day out, so yes i agree with you.

however, the reason for that comment that i made, was that i am under the impression that most on here are nowhere near that figure.
i know some are, but i think that most are well below it.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: GDwindowcleaning on February 27, 2012, 11:59:46 pm
Come on richard tell the truth, you only have one guy working for you and he works alone. You also only have 400 customers so you dont actually do 50 in a day all month....

I agree that 50 in a day should be possible with 2 men....
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: stuart mc on February 28, 2012, 12:00:24 am
are you for real richard 50 houses a day between two men is and must be easily achievable, I would expect two trad guys to do that easily in a day working 8 am till 4, never mind wfp

I must add this is based on the type of house on the posters link

hey stuart,

i know it's easily achievable day in day out, so yes i agree with you.

however, the reason for that comment that i made, was that i am under the impression that most on here are nowhere near that figure.
i know some are, but i think that most are well below it.

fair enough, I get that feeling as well, a lot of days I don't do that amount, but I don't do property's like that day in day out, some are more awkward etc and I do commercial mornings and don't get started on domestic till a bit later

I often scratch my head when I see a pic or link and how much is being charged and how much time is being took to do the job, I have to be that bit quicker because the prices are that wee bit cheaper up here, and I am expensive on the whole
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 28, 2012, 07:47:51 am
Come on richard tell the truth, you only have one guy working for you and he works alone. You also only have 400 customers so you dont actually do 50 in a day all month....

I agree that 50 in a day should be possible with 2 men....

Quote
Re: To justify a 2nd van...
« Reply #113 on: February 17, 2012, 11:16:48 am »   

Thats my last word on the matter because I am not getting into a petty arguement.

Hello again GD canvasser???

Despite repeatedly stating that you're not going to get involved in a 'petty argument' you just cant help having digs can you.

You're constant niggling is really childish
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: H S and Son on February 28, 2012, 08:40:55 am
Sounds like a lot of justification going on here.


You dont need two people to walk fast or jump out.

driver jumps in van, sets sat nav Do they need to waste time setting a sat nav? I know where my next job is and how to get to it with my eyes closed.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: GDwindowcleaning on February 28, 2012, 08:50:11 am
Hi Richard,

This is my first comment since our last discussion, hardly constant is it?

Coming on here saying you do this that and the other is more childish....

If you had just answered the question instead of turning it into a personal dig then I would have had no need to comment again...
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 28, 2012, 09:25:53 am

Coming on here saying you do this that and the other is more childish....


Have you read the title of the thread before you commented?  FAO Richard Speech?????

Ian is a WC working in the same area who's seem our guys work and is interested in what we do.

Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Sean Dyer on February 28, 2012, 09:35:50 am
i dont get it surely it would be much quicker having someone smashing the back of a house with a big conservatory and makin way round to the side than have someone to manouvere a hose around for the junior operator

im not having a go richard just differing opinions

its all down to the speed the pole operator is working at.  if the pole operator is moving fast, from window to window, it makes a big difference
having a helper.

if its a first clean, then they dont make a difference at all, so we dont put 2 guys on for these.

and tosh, i agree with you when you say one worker should never be stood around.  the van driver is working just as quickly to keep the pole
operator working so fast.

the only reason we do it like this is because it is the best, and by that i mean fastest and easiest way we've found.

not many hit the number of houses that we do in a day.  there's others on here who do, but not many of them.


im sure there are plenty of 2man van operations that are organised enough to be just as quick or quicker. I agree with the comments that suggest 2 guys should be working not one pulling hose and posting tickets. For example. One man goes to do back opens gate if necessary and then front guy works towards him. The gate is open and windows getting cleaned twice as fast ? Id love to see you guys working Richard. Genuinely. I dont dis believe you . Just need to see it to get it i suppose.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: GDwindowcleaning on February 28, 2012, 09:42:16 am
Richard if you come on here with such inflammatory comments you are going to get attention.  And when someone points out a flaw in what you say you start to get personal....

Personally I dont have a problem with you as I dont know you but you come on saying you do this and you do that.

I dont disbelieve you that its possible and would love to see it in action....
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 28, 2012, 09:51:02 am
Richard if you come on here with such inflammatory comments you are going to get attention.  And when someone points out a flaw in what you say you start to get personal....

Personally I dont have a problem with you as I dont know you but you come on saying you do this and you do that.


there's nothing inflammatory about what i'm saying.  there are plenty of people on here that work as fast, or faster.
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: GDwindowcleaning on February 28, 2012, 09:56:20 am
But its not what you do every day richard so it sounds like its not true, you still havent commented on that....
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 28, 2012, 10:03:45 am
But its not what you do every day richard so it sounds like its not true, you still havent commented on that....

i commented on that on the 2nd van thread.  look back at your previous  :-*
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: GDwindowcleaning on February 28, 2012, 10:09:02 am
Lol thats not how it works on a forum, you cant expect people reading this thread to check back...
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Richard iSparkle on February 28, 2012, 11:06:31 am
Lol thats not how it works on a forum, you cant expect people reading this thread to check back...

i can expect you to recall the comment as it was a comment in response to your questions
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: GDwindowcleaning on February 28, 2012, 11:16:10 am
What about everyone else? They might want to know your response...
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Small but perfectley formed on February 28, 2012, 06:10:33 pm
like to see you doing that many when you have been doing it day in day out for 20 yrs :'(
Title: Re: FAO Richard Speech ... Time and motion example
Post by: Ian101 on February 28, 2012, 06:47:53 pm
Thanks for your input Richard  :)

Now locked as question answered.