I think that post says it all. I agree with every word.
The thing is if you asked Kempy or whoever else was part of its inception they would simply say to those who see that Vision has no benefit that ‘there are those that have a different experience than others using Vision’.
I’d like to know why they have a different experience compared to other punters.
When someone eats ice-cream you have pretty much the same experience as the next person eating ice-cream. Its cold, it hurts your teeth, it tastes nice and it makes you fat if you eat too much.
If you use the same lawn mower as the next bloke you’ll have pretty much the same experience as the next bloke using the same lawn mower, it cuts the grass, makes a whirring noise, and creates a wonderfully refreshing and relaxing smell.
I think the truth about Vision is that everyone that uses it also has the same experience, just some choose to be drawn in by the hype and others see the reality of the product. They choose to believe the hype because they want to think they’re doing a better job and if they subscribe to the hype then they convince themselves that they are.
Its like Marmite, everyone has the same experience and taste sensation when they eat it, some like it, some don’t, but it's still exactly the same experience.
