woodman

  • Posts: 1069
Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« on: May 11, 2004, 08:52:50 pm »
Hi Guys

I had the guy for Dry Fusion come over today to carry out a demo clean at some empty offices I was cleaning.

Just out of interest I suggested we both cleaned to make a comparison.

He ran the DF along one half of the office while I cleaned the other half with CFR (the carpet is synthetic Huega tiles).

I carried out a pre-spraying with Solutions No 2 and clear water rinse.

He used DF restore pre-spray then activator on his pads.

Results were DF dried within 30-45 minutes and the tiles were impressivley clean and it was much faster with much less effort.

CFR performed well but the tiles on my half were still damp on leaving after 2hrs, while the appearance of the clean was acceptable, side by side I would have to say Dry Fusion out performed.

The other thing that struck me was the smaller amount of kit carried, the CFR took some lugging :'( up two flights of stairs and along with the hoses,buckets,sprayers,wands,Sebo & chemicals etc it looked like I had three times the amount of kit, to carry out the same job.

I think I will be joining the ranks of the Fusioneers before to long ;)


Mark Betts

  • Posts: 449
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2004, 09:06:47 pm »
Interesting Post,

What would have been a good comparison would be say Dry Fusion against Charley Pads and Solutions.

Same sort of kit but a HUGE difference in start up costs as a lot of us have rotaries anyway.



Mark
A Dog Isnt Just For Christmas.........  Save a Bit For Boxing Day  !!!!!

Dynafoam

Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2004, 09:19:56 pm »
Trevor,

Very interesting to hear the results of a rel-life demo !

It will be interesting to hear any comments if you re-visit the site in the future as visible results can sometimes be 'cosmetic.

Marks' scenario would be revealing.

Thank for the info.,

John.

woodman

  • Posts: 1069
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2004, 09:52:55 pm »
I'll let you know,

As I am doing the floor above it next month and the floor below it the month after. ;)

God what a thought, going back and seeing one half soiled and the other still clean, maybe I won't get them floors to do after all ,

Thanks John, thats gonner have me up all night worrying now :-[ ;D ;D


nordan

Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2004, 09:54:20 pm »
hi  what kind of money are we talking for a dry fusion machine. thanks Danny

woodman

  • Posts: 1069
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #5 on: May 11, 2004, 09:59:01 pm »
Hi Nordan

The domestic package is £3028 inc vat

The Commercial package £3543 inc vat
(Contains 10 extra pads and a restoration brush not included in the domestic package)

Trevor

nordan

Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #6 on: May 11, 2004, 10:08:29 pm »
I think thats a lot of money for a jazzed up floor buffer. But maybe if they are that good and fast .well i don't know     thanks Danny

Derek

Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #7 on: May 11, 2004, 10:31:48 pm »
Hi

Taking it a stage further...comparisons between the two already mentioned plus the OP machine... again with results a few weeks down the line

I can feel another sunny day out coming on!

Cheers
Derek

cleanmac

  • Posts: 104
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #8 on: May 11, 2004, 10:45:32 pm »
hi Woodman

I am selling a dryfusion setup.
sent me a private message leaving your phone number and i wil give you a ring.
If this is of any interest to you.

Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #9 on: May 11, 2004, 11:41:11 pm »
If your dry fusion is so good why are you selling it?


cleanmac

  • Posts: 104
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #10 on: May 11, 2004, 11:47:20 pm »
I can not recall making any statments about dryfusion

either positive nor negative.

cleanmac

  • Posts: 104
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #11 on: May 12, 2004, 12:10:54 am »
To scots_cleaner

I am also selling a duplex 420 new and boxed
a Truvox lowspeed rotary as new and a chemspec 2000 HWE porta with heater wand etc

Now would you like to query the quality of these products too ?

David

Doug Holloway

  • Posts: 3917
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #12 on: May 12, 2004, 12:30:08 am »
Hi Guys

Is this a private spat between two scots or can we all join in , afterall I've got a scottish name!

The Dry Fusion thing does intrigue me !

Is it an old method which skilful operators can use to good effect or is it a new way forward?

I've seen these things quoted at £3500 so its obviously a decision worth thinking about.

Any comments gratefully received.

Cheers,

Doug

Len Gribble

  • Posts: 5106
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #13 on: May 12, 2004, 12:36:01 am »
David

What speed and size is the Truvox?

Len
Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other. (Sidcup Kent)

nordan

Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #14 on: May 12, 2004, 12:43:02 am »
hi how much for the duplex please thanks Danny

Ken Wainwright

  • Posts: 2107
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #15 on: May 12, 2004, 12:46:42 am »
Hi Doug

Yes it is a move forward within the industry and yes it relies on an old method in part. The old technology is a rotary machine as a means of providing agitation via pad, but that's where the similarity ends. The combination of the machine, the heat (from the on board heater) the pads and the chemistry provides a self contained efficient cleaning system. In my opinion, it excells on low profile carpets, but is effective on most other types. This week I also cleaned (maintained) a busy pub carpet. Results are stunning. I've got a photo of that too. I don't know how to post that on Cleanitup, so I'll post it on one of the other UK boards for you to see. The training and skill required for using Dry Fusion and the other Low Moisture Systems is pretty minimal. As long as an operative is able to follow some very simple basic instructions it's easy to achieve high standards. Because I'm the best CC in the village of Alvechurch it's a doddle for me ::)

The purchase of a Low Moisture System such as Dry Fusion, even at £3500 is a very cheap way of tapping into the lucrative market of office carpet cleaning. Much lower cost than a T/M and, some of us would debate, superior in many cases.

Safe and happy cleaning:)
Ken
Veni, vidi vici, Vaxi
I came, I saw, I conquered, I cleaned up!

cleanmac

  • Posts: 104
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #16 on: May 12, 2004, 01:05:07 am »
Hi len.

Truvox trophy 200 rpm +tank
Little used shampoo brush
New hard floor srubbing brush (used once for testing)

David

cleanmac

  • Posts: 104
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #17 on: May 12, 2004, 01:16:13 am »
Len

I forgot to tell you the size ,it is 15 inch.

Plus there is a drive board for the pads as well.

Doug.

The wife is scots ,had to follow her up the high road.


stevegunn

Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #18 on: March 04, 2005, 04:23:02 pm »
I'll let you know,

As I am doing the floor above it next month and the floor below it the month after. ;)

God what a thought, going back and seeing one half soiled and the other still clean, maybe I won't get them floors to do after all ,

Thanks John, thats gonner have me up all night worrying now :-[ ;D ;D



Woodman whats your findings when you returned?

mark_roberts

  • Posts: 1899
Re: Dry Fusion v CFR test clean
« Reply #19 on: March 04, 2005, 05:27:38 pm »
I thought woodman had texatherm??

Anyway with this day out on 31st is it possible to tape off 7 areas of equal size and stained carpet.  Then clean with eclispe, recoil, truckmount, cfr, dry fusion, texatherm, charly pad etc so we can all establish which performs side by side.

thanks
Mark