Klean07

  • Posts: 3218
Weigh bridge woes!!!
« on: November 27, 2010, 11:51:41 am »
I was chatting to another wc this morning that I know. He was saying that the police were checking vans the other day in his area for defaults and being overweight etc. Anyways they stopped him in his vivaro and was told to follow police to a weighbridge. The guy knew he was overweight but crafty as he is turned system on from cab area and whilst driving to weighbridge 6 miles away dumped a few litres of water out of his back doors in the proccess.
Anyway when he finally got on weighbridge he was about 5 litres under so copper let him off. So he saved himself a hefty fine.
MMm maybe try that myself if I ever get pulled.
kkleanwindowcleaning.co.uk

David Kent @ KentKleen

  • Posts: 1712
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2010, 11:58:07 am »
I was in the car transporting business for a while.
Dont risk it is my advice.
the police arnt daft!!!!!!!!
You can get pulled into a layby straight away and they can weigh you there and then.
Find out what your payload is and then work out what you can carry.
1 litre of water = around 1 kg in weight
Remember the total weight includes you and any passengers. you cant get out and just have the van weighed.
Hope this helps.
1st offence will cost ya around 150.00 BUT could go all the way up to 5000.00+

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2010, 12:37:58 pm »
you joking , the police arent daft,you  obviously dont know many ;D ;D plus they are also useless

David Kent @ KentKleen

  • Posts: 1712
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2010, 12:52:08 pm »
sisters an inspector, been pulled over 20 times intruck. they know all the tricks. i have found thro experience to keep the right side of the law.
Your not insured if you are over weight and will do time if you injure someone whilst driving overweight!!
Fancy a bit of that Barry!! :-X

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2010, 01:06:00 pm »
get one over on the police and u will be amazed how many times u get pulled for routine inspection,  or u just happen to be the 7th car along that they are pulling

David Kent @ KentKleen

  • Posts: 1712
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2010, 01:52:37 pm »
joking apart, any overweight or un secured load issues can be dealt with in a severe way if the particular police force are having a CLAMP down on them.
Every so often the police will go out and target particlar offences.
Did you know carring an unsecured 25ltr container FULL of water is an offence! in a commerical/business use setting!!!
Take care lads keep an eye out in that rear view mirror!! ;)

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2010, 02:40:13 pm »
Your not insured if you are over weight and will do time if you injure someone whilst driving overweight!!

What about an unsecure load?

David Kent @ KentKleen

  • Posts: 1712
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2010, 03:12:26 pm »
if your unsecured load causes death or injury. i.e you are travelling to a job with your work partner or employee and god forbid you are involved in an accident, that unsecured 25ltr drum can do you or your passenger alot of damage flying about at speed.
not a nice thought.
would be a freak accident but they do happen.

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2010, 03:20:36 pm »
I mean isn't that an imprisonable offence like you mentioned in your previous post about being overweight.

dd

  • Posts: 2527
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2010, 03:37:59 pm »
I was chatting to another wc this morning that I know. He was saying that the police were checking vans the other day in his area for defaults and being overweight etc. Anyways they stopped him in his vivaro and was told to follow police to a weighbridge. The guy knew he was overweight but crafty as he is turned system on from cab area and whilst driving to weighbridge 6 miles away dumped a few litres of water out of his back doors in the proccess.
Anyway when he finally got on weighbridge he was about 5 litres under so copper let him off. So he saved himself a hefty fine.
MMm maybe try that myself if I ever get pulled.
Very irresposible attitude.

chopsie

  • Posts: 1736
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2010, 03:43:08 pm »
I cannot work out which numbers on the plate in my Transit is the payload?
chopsie

David Kent @ KentKleen

  • Posts: 1712
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2010, 03:46:23 pm »
what model trannie is it chopsie

chopsie

  • Posts: 1736
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #12 on: November 27, 2010, 04:27:21 pm »
its the smallest one. think its a T260, 55 plate
chopsie

David Kent @ KentKleen

  • Posts: 1712
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #13 on: November 27, 2010, 04:31:04 pm »
you will have a total weight limit of 2.6 tonnes. Thats you the van and the system. so easiest way for you to see if you are running legal is fill up with water and go to a public weigh bridge.
hope this helps

Paul Coleman

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #14 on: November 27, 2010, 05:08:15 pm »
joking apart, any overweight or un secured load issues can be dealt with in a severe way if the particular police force are having a CLAMP down on them.
Every so often the police will go out and target particlar offences.
Did you know carring an unsecured 25ltr container FULL of water is an offence! in a commerical/business use setting!!!
Take care lads keep an eye out in that rear view mirror!! ;)

Really.  What about an unsecured hose reel or an unsecured bag of rock salt?  Or my unsecured rubber matting that goes over hoses for safety purposes.  Surely it's not possible to secure everything n the back of a van?  That would be ridiculous.

David Kent @ KentKleen

  • Posts: 1712
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #15 on: November 27, 2010, 05:44:08 pm »
unsecured hose reel in the back of your car travelling to your mothers for dinner, no problem.
unsecured hose reel in the back of your car travelling to your next customer, different matter all together.
Dont get me wrong i am not trying to be a scare monger.
I am just showing that ,god forbid if you did have an accident while operating (in business time) and something unsecured or overweight was found at scene or during further investigation you will be prosecuted!
Fact!
Involuntary manslaughter! death caused by an insecure load. Google it! it will open your eyes. I wouldnt fancy my chances if my 2 hose reels came flying towards me in an accident!
 

bad trippy

  • Posts: 3268
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2010, 07:05:26 pm »
Bloody police. always poking their noses into other ppls business
www.clearviewbristol.co.uk
Add me on Facebook clear view window cleaning

chopsie

  • Posts: 1736
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2010, 07:09:14 pm »
you will have a total weight limit of 2.6 tonnes. Thats you the van and the system. so easiest way for you to see if you are running legal is fill up with water and go to a public weigh bridge.
hope this helps
cheers, i will do that one day (when i find a weigh bridge)
chopsie

Nick Wareham

  • Posts: 244
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #18 on: November 27, 2010, 09:52:32 pm »
Quote
Bloody police. always poking their noses into other ppls business

Yeah, how dare they uphold the law.  The sheer cheek of it.

Klean07

  • Posts: 3218
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #19 on: November 27, 2010, 10:04:37 pm »
Just goes to show that we shouldn't ever get complacent as you never know whats round the corner.
kkleanwindowcleaning.co.uk

Paul Coleman

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2010, 08:03:52 am »
unsecured hose reel in the back of your car travelling to your mothers for dinner, no problem.
unsecured hose reel in the back of your car travelling to your next customer, different matter all together.
Dont get me wrong i am not trying to be a scare monger.
I am just showing that ,god forbid if you did have an accident while operating (in business time) and something unsecured or overweight was found at scene or during further investigation you will be prosecuted!
Fact!
Involuntary manslaughter! death caused by an insecure load. Google it! it will open your eyes. I wouldnt fancy my chances if my 2 hose reels came flying towards me in an accident!
 

I think the tank would block anything from flying through the metal bulkhead anyway.
Most drive betweens are a fairly short distance and on low speed roads so probably not such an issue but the odd far away job or the journeys to and from first and last jobs might be.
I suppose I will have to go to my friends' places for cups of tea between every job  :)

Rob_Mac

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #21 on: November 28, 2010, 08:19:58 am »
You stop being complacent when you have an accident.

Metal bulkhead on a Transit LWB van, 1000litre IBC tank, full, ratchet strapped But as we found out not tight enough.

Had a crash at 30mph and lost about 18 inches of the cab space as the tank moved forward on impact.

Rob ;D

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #22 on: November 28, 2010, 08:30:12 am »
Was the tank hard up against the bulkhead?

Have you got any pictures of this please?

Matt

Rob_Mac

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #23 on: November 28, 2010, 08:39:02 am »
It was a Y reg transit just after we went over to wfp, over six years ago now. I may have been doing forty but no more. I think there was a gap between the bulkhead and tank. Long time ago.

I know I ended up right up against the steering wheel.

Rob ;D

Smart Carpet

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #24 on: November 28, 2010, 08:43:05 am »
So there goes the argument that carrying barrels instead of properly fitting a tank means that you are just carrying 'cargo' and don't have to insure it differently..  

The unsafe load of barrels etc could invalidate any insurance anyway!


The penalty for carrying an unsafe load can range from a verbal warning to a £60 fixed penalty notice. Drivers can also be issued with an immediate prohibition notice.

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/vehicles/vssafety/safetyloadsonvehicles.pdf

page 111 on the above PDF link states this:

Regulation 40A of the Road Traffic Act1988
introduced by the Road Traffic Act 1991
40 A. A Person is guilty of an offence if he uses, or causes or permits another to use, a motor vehicle
or trailer on a road when:
(a) the condition of the motor vehicle or trailer, or of its accessories or equipment, or
(b) the purpose for which it is used, or
(c) the number of passengers carried by it, or the manner in which they are carried, or
(d) the weight, position or distribution of its load, or the manner in which it is secured,
is such that the use of the motor vehicle or trailer involves a danger of injury to any person.



Appendix A
111

Klean07

  • Posts: 3218
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #25 on: November 28, 2010, 09:19:24 am »
Wonder how many wcs have read this post and are now worried that their tank either isn't secured properly or they're overloading their vans by carrying too much water.
kkleanwindowcleaning.co.uk


Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #27 on: November 28, 2010, 11:37:00 am »
It was a Y reg transit just after we went over to wfp, over six years ago now. I may have been doing forty but no more. I think there was a gap between the bulkhead and tank. Long time ago.

I know I ended up right up against the steering wheel.

Rob ;D

But it was strapped down somehow yeah? Ratchet straps through the lugs that are in the floor?

Steve_c

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #28 on: November 28, 2010, 12:56:53 pm »
When i brought my system i had already put a deposit on a ford Transit 260 Ex Gas board, ionics told me the pay load was not sufficient i needed 280 plus. Luckily the van center had a Ex bt van a T300 i just transferred the deposit over to that van. All wfp companies that fit systems won't fit them unless your systems weight matches your vehicle.

Spruce

  • Posts: 8364
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #29 on: November 28, 2010, 02:48:09 pm »
I cannot work out which numbers on the plate in my Transit is the payload?

Chopsie
Not sure of the very latest T260 but the 2005 Tddi has a payload of 988kgs. So the weight of a tank of diesel, driver and passenger and any other fixed accessories fitted, ie bulkhead, roofrack etc, removed from that figure will be what you have left to work with.
IMO if you have a 650l tank fitted and fully fill it, you could very well be overloaded.
Spruce
Success is 1% inspiration, 98% perspiration and 2% attention to detail!

The older I get, the better I was ;)

mark mann

  • Posts: 345
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #30 on: November 28, 2010, 03:47:31 pm »
just leave your wallet on path when they come to weigh you  ;D
an optimist takes the tartare sauce with him when he goes fishing -

Dave Willis

Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #31 on: November 28, 2010, 04:58:19 pm »
Isn't the clue in the numbers?

T260 = 2.6 tonnes
T300 = 3 tonnes

My Toyota is a 280 - 2.8 tonnes

Klean07

  • Posts: 3218
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #32 on: November 28, 2010, 07:12:10 pm »
The other important thing to remember here is how full your fuel tank is. My fuel tank only ever gets filled to halfway hence me be able to carry more water.
kkleanwindowcleaning.co.uk

chopsie

  • Posts: 1736
Re: Weigh bridge woes!!!
« Reply #33 on: November 28, 2010, 07:22:38 pm »
Chopsie
Not sure of the very latest T260 but the 2005 Tddi has a payload of 988kgs. So the weight of a tank of diesel, driver and passenger and any other fixed accessories fitted, ie bulkhead, roofrack etc, removed from that figure will be what you have left to work with.
IMO if you have a 650l tank fitted and fully fill it, you could very well be overloaded.
Spruce

Cheers, Mine is a 2005, So that will do, I got a 400 litre tank in,could do with a bit more really, I have also had a rear bench seat fitted so that will reduce my payload even more.


Isn't the clue in the numbers?

T260 = 2.6 tonnes
T300 = 3 tonnes

My Toyota is a 280 - 2.8 tonnes

I assume this is the total weight of the vehicle and permitted payload, As I am dam sure my van could not handle 2.6 tonnes in the back  :o
chopsie